Apache Ignite Developers - Legacy Mail Archive

Thin clients features wiki page

Classic

List

Threaded

12 messages Options

Igor Sapego-2

Thin clients features wiki page

Hello Igniters,

I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
of clients.

Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.

[1] -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clients+features

Best Regards,
Igor

Alexey Kosenchuk

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Hi Igor,

"Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a
"binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.

Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
- complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
- enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
- type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)

Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and write.
But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.

Thanks,
-Alexey

14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:

> Hello Igniters,
>
> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
> of clients.
>
> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
>
> [1] -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clients+features
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>

Denis Magda

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Igor, thanks for putting together the page.

As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's suggestions.

This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once it's
sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.

--
Denis

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Igor,
>
> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a "binary"
> form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not specified
> another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
>
> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>
> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and write.
> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alexey
>
> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
>
> Hello Igniters,
>>
>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
>> of clients.
>>
>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
>>
>> [1] -
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clients+features
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Igor
>>
>>

Igor Sapego-2

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.

Denis,
Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients
(or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one
more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.

Best Regards,
Igor

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
>
> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's suggestions.
>
> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once it's
> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
>
> --
> Denis
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Igor,
>>
>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a "binary"
>> form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not specified
>> another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
>>
>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>>
>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and write.
>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alexey
>>
>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
>>
>> Hello Igniters,
>>>
>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
>>> of clients.
>>>
>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
>>>
>>> [1] -
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clients+features
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Igor
>>>
>>>
>

Igor Sapego-2

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

I've updated the table.

Best Regards,
Igor

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
>
> Denis,
> Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
> while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients
> (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one
> more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
>>
>> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's suggestions.
>>
>> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once it's
>> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
>>
>> --
>> Denis
>>
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Igor,
>>>
>>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a
>>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
>>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
>>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
>>>
>>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
>>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
>>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>>>
>>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and write.
>>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alexey
>>>
>>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
>>>
>>> Hello Igniters,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
>>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
>>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
>>>> of clients.
>>>>
>>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
>>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
>>>>
>>>> [1] -
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
>>>> nts+features
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Igor
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Denis Magda

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

In reply to this post by Igor Sapego-2

Igor,

That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new documentation
engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6.
Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.

--
Denis

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:

Pavel Tupitsyn

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Hi Igor,

Thanks for creating this!
One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?

Pavel

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Igor,
>
> That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new documentation
> engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6.
> Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
>
> --
> Denis
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
> >
> > Denis,
> > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
> > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients
> > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one
> > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
> >>
> >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's suggestions.
> >>
> >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once
> it's
> >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Denis
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Igor,
> >>>
> >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a
> >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
> >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> >>>
> >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and write.
> >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Alexey
> >>>
> >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Igniters,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
> >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
> >>>> of clients.
> >>>>
> >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
> >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] -
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
> >>>> nts+features
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Igor
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>

Igor Sapego-2

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Pavel,

This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client)
by several threads.

By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this
feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed
to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients.

Best Regards,
Igor

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Igor,
>
> Thanks for creating this!
> One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?
>
> Pavel
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Igor,
> >
> > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new documentation
> > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6.
> > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
> >
> > --
> > Denis
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
> > >
> > > Denis,
> > > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
> > > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients
> > > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one
> > > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Igor
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
> > >>
> > >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's
> suggestions.
> > >>
> > >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once
> > it's
> > >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Denis
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Igor,
> > >>>
> > >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a
> > >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> > >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
> > >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> > >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> > >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and
> write.
> > >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> -Alexey
> > >>>
> > >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello Igniters,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> > >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
> > >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
> > >>>> of clients.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
> > >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] -
> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
> > >>>> nts+features
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>> Igor
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Sergey Stronchinskiy

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Hi Igor,

Nice one!

On 16 May 2018 at 11:26, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Pavel,
>
> This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client)
> by several threads.
>
> By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this
> feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed
> to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients.
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > Thanks for creating this!
> > One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Igor,
> > >
> > > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new
> documentation
> > > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6.
> > > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
> > > >
> > > > Denis,
> > > > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
> > > > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients
> > > > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one
> > > > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Igor
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
> > > >>
> > > >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's
> > suggestions.
> > > >>
> > > >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once
> > > it's
> > > >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Denis
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> > > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Igor,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a
> > > >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> > > >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
> > > >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> > > >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> > > >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and
> > write.
> > > >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> -Alexey
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello Igniters,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> > > >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan
> development
> > > >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
> > > >>>> of clients.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
> > > >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] -
> > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
> > > >>>> nts+features
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best Regards,
> > > >>>> Igor
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Pavel Tupitsyn

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Ignite.NET client is thread-safe as stated in XMLDoc [1]

[1]
https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/platforms/dotnet/Apache.Ignite.Core/Client/IIgniteClient.cs

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Guru Stron <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Igor,
>
> Nice one!
>
> On 16 May 2018 at 11:26, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Pavel,
> >
> > This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client)
> > by several threads.
> >
> > By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this
> > feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed
> > to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Igor,
> > >
> > > Thanks for creating this!
> > > One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?
> > >
> > > Pavel
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Igor,
> > > >
> > > > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new
> > documentation
> > > > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within
> 2.6.
> > > > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Denis
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Denis,
> > > > > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK,
> > > > > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more
> clients
> > > > > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a
> one
> > > > > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Igor
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's
> > > suggestions.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that
> once
> > > > it's
> > > > >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Denis
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> > > > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi Igor,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a
> > > > >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> > > > >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
> > > > >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> > > > >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> > > > >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > > >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and
> > > write.
> > > > >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >>> -Alexey
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hello Igniters,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> > > > >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan
> > development
> > > > >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a
> state
> > > > >>>> of clients.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
> > > > >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> [1] -
> > > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
> > > > >>>> nts+features
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Best Regards,
> > > > >>>> Igor
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Igor Sapego

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Fixed for .NET.

What about NodeJS? Alexey?

Best Regards,
Igor

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Ignite.NET client is thread-safe as stated in XMLDoc [1]
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/
> platforms/dotnet/Apache.Ignite.Core/Client/IIgniteClient.cs
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Guru Stron <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > Nice one!
> >
> > On 16 May 2018 at 11:26, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Pavel,
> > >
> > > This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client)
> > > by several threads.
> > >
> > > By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this
> > > feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed
> > > to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Igor
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Igor,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for creating this!
> > > > One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?
> > > >
> > > > Pavel
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Igor,
> > > > >
> > > > > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new
> > > documentation
> > > > > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within
> > 2.6.
> > > > > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Denis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Denis,
> > > > > > Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look
> OK,
> > > > > > while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more
> > clients
> > > > > > (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a
> > one
> > > > > > more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Igor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's
> > > > suggestions.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that
> > once
> > > > > it's
> > > > > >> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Denis
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
> > > > > >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hi Igor,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in
> a
> > > > > >>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
> > > > > >>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
> > > > > >>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
> > > > > >>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
> > > > > >>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > > > >>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read
> and
> > > > write.
> > > > > >>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three
> clients.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>> -Alexey
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hello Igniters,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
> > > > > >>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan
> > > development
> > > > > >>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a
> > state
> > > > > >>>> of clients.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
> > > > > >>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> [1] -
> > > > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
> > > > > >>>> nts+features
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Best Regards,
> > > > > >>>> Igor
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Alexey Kosenchuk

Re: Thin clients features wiki page

Not applicable for NodeJS client as there are no threads in NodeJS (only
processes) [1]

Just in case - of course, it's possible to run multiple
queries/operations concurrently from one thread/process.
Eg. see Promise.all in CachePutGetExample.js and AuthTlsExample.js
examples [2]

Is Java thin client really not thread-safe?

Is thread-safety a mandatory req for all clients (where it is applicable)?

-Alexey

[1] https://nodejs.org/en/about/
[2]
https://github.com/nobitlost/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/nodejs/examples

16.05.2018 12:53, Igor Sapego пишет:

> Fixed for .NET.
>
> What about NodeJS? Alexey?
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Ignite.NET client is thread-safe as stated in XMLDoc [1]
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/
>> platforms/dotnet/Apache.Ignite.Core/Client/IIgniteClient.cs
>>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Guru Stron <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Igor,
>>>
>>> Nice one!
>>>
>>> On 16 May 2018 at 11:26, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pavel,
>>>>
>>>> This is about concurrent usage of the same connection (client)
>>>> by several threads.
>>>>
>>>> By the ways guys, I wanted to ask you, if your clients support this
>>>> feature, as I was not sure. I mean, protocol seems to be designed
>>>> to support such use-case, but I was not sure about clients.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Igor
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Igor,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for creating this!
>>>>> One question: what is `Multithreading` feature?
>>>>>
>>>>> Pavel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new
>>>> documentation
>>>>>> engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within
>>> 2.6.
>>>>>> Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>> Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look
>> OK,
>>>>>>> while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more
>>> clients
>>>>>>> (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a
>>> one
>>>>>>> more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <
>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Igor, thanks for putting together the page.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's
>>>>> suggestions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that
>>> once
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Igor,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in
>> a
>>>>>>>>> "binary" form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS:
>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not
>>>>>>>>> specified another JavaScript Object for deserialization.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
>>>>>>>>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
>>>>>>>>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>>>>>>>>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read
>> and
>>>>> write.
>>>>>>>>> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three
>> clients.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> -Alexey
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
>>>>>>>>>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan
>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a
>>> state
>>>>>>>>>> of clients.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
>>>>>>>>>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] -
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clie
>>>>>>>>>> nts+features
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>