IGNITE-1084 is ready for review

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

IGNITE-1084 is ready for review

vadopolski
Hello guys!

The issue IGNITE-1084 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 fixed
originally by Milap Wadhwa.

I reassigned it on myself because she didn't make improvements from Anton
Vinogradov's comments. Also I just finished another issue with hibernate's
test.

Review it please - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1828

Vadim Opolski
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: IGNITE-1084 is ready for review

Semyon Boikov
Thanks Vadim, I'll do review today.

Semyon

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hello guys!
>
> The issue IGNITE-1084 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 fixed
> originally by Milap Wadhwa.
>
> I reassigned it on myself because she didn't make improvements from Anton
> Vinogradov's comments. Also I just finished another issue with hibernate's
> test.
>
> Review it please - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1828
>
> Vadim Opolski
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: IGNITE-1084 is ready for review

Semyon Boikov
In reply to this post by vadopolski
Vadim,

I found that real cause of IGNITE-1084 is IGNITE-4760, so suggested test
fix in pull/1828 is not correct. I added new comments in IGNITE-4760,
please take a look.

Thanks,
Semyon

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hello guys!
>
> The issue IGNITE-1084 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 fixed
> originally by Milap Wadhwa.
>
> I reassigned it on myself because she didn't make improvements from Anton
> Vinogradov's comments. Also I just finished another issue with hibernate's
> test.
>
> Review it please - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1828
>
> Vadim Opolski
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: IGNITE-1084 is ready for review

vadopolski
Hello guys!

Semen, Sergey is issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1084 resolved
?

Vadim Opolski

2017-04-19 14:06 GMT+03:00 Semyon Boikov <[hidden email]>:

> Vadim,
>
> I found that real cause of IGNITE-1084 is IGNITE-4760, so suggested test
> fix in pull/1828 is not correct. I added new comments in IGNITE-4760,
> please take a look.
>
> Thanks,
> Semyon
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello guys!
>>
>> The issue IGNITE-1084 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 fixed
>> originally by Milap Wadhwa.
>>
>> I reassigned it on myself because she didn't make improvements from Anton
>> Vinogradov's comments. Also I just finished another issue with hibernate's
>> test.
>>
>> Review it please - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1828
>>
>> Vadim Opolski
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: IGNITE-1084 is ready for review

Semyon Boikov
Hi Vadim,

I see that testNaturalIdCache still fails for
HibernateL2CacheTransactionalSelfTest, need investigate and find root cause
of failure.

Thanks

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hello guys!
>
> Semen, Sergey is issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1084 resolved
> ?
>
> Vadim Opolski
>
> 2017-04-19 14:06 GMT+03:00 Semyon Boikov <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Vadim,
>>
>> I found that real cause of IGNITE-1084 is IGNITE-4760, so suggested test
>> fix in pull/1828 is not correct. I added new comments in IGNITE-4760,
>> please take a look.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Semyon
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello guys!
>>>
>>> The issue IGNITE-1084 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 fixed
>>> originally by Milap Wadhwa.
>>>
>>> I reassigned it on myself because she didn't make improvements from
>>> Anton Vinogradov's comments. Also I just finished another issue with
>>> hibernate's test.
>>>
>>> Review it please - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1828
>>>
>>> Vadim Opolski
>>>
>>
>>
>