Apache Ignite Developers - Legacy Mail Archive

Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Classic

List

Threaded

66 messages Options

1234

Igor Sapego

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

IGNITE-4249: ODBC latency improved.
IGNITE-3587: Added Distributed Joins support for ODBC.
IGNITE-3390: Added DSN support for ODBC.

Best Regards,
Igor

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Andrey Mashenkov <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Vladimir,
>
> IGNITE-3735: ODBC escape sequences support
> IGNITE-3448: DISTINCT Aggregates support added
> IGNITE-4145: Fixed race in distributed SQL queries
> IGNITE-2974: ODBC NIO support
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > IGNITE-2968 and IGNITE-2969 introduce deadlock detection for transactions
> > on near caches and for optimistic transactions.
> > I think it should be added to release notes.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> > > completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> > >
> > > Vladimir.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
> in
> > > > optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> > following
> > > > unclear points
> > > > 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > > > 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> ignite-cassandra-store?
> > In
> > > > that case why do not make one module?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
> > in
> > > > > 1.8 branch).
> > > > >
> > > > > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > > > > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > > > >
> > > > > - Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > > > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> > message
> > > > > because
> > > > > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > > > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Folks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> several
> > > > > problems
> > > > > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > > > > ignite-1.8
> > > > > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> > next
> > > > > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Any objections?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Vladimir.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Denis,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> > But
> > > > now
> > > > > we
> > > > > >> > have some
> > > > > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
> them.
> > > > There
> > > > > >> is a
> > > > > >> > ticket for
> > > > > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > > > >> > Igor
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Alexander,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
> changes?
> > > > Can I
> > > > > >> > start
> > > > > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> > <
> > > > > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > —
> > > > > >> > > Denis
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > > > >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Folks,
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is
> now
> > > > good
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
> will
> > > be
> > > > > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > > > > features
> > > > > >> on
> > > > > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
> > (shortly):
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > > > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > - Alex
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > > > >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> - Alex
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >:
> > > > > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> > > seems
> > > > > that
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> > > are
> > > > > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
> > biggest
> > > > > >> remaining
> > > > > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate
> branch
> > > for
> > > > > 1.8
> > > > > >> as
> > > > > >> > > soon
> > > > > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
> > might
> > > > > >> happen?
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > > > Recently
> > > > > >> > there
> > > > > >> > > was
> > > > > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> > difficulties
> > > > > >> related
> > > > > >> > to
> > > > > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> > > versions
> > > > > >> > > co-exist at
> > > > > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version
> for
> > > the
> > > > > >> > > documentation
> > > > > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
> create
> > a
> > > > > hidden
> > > > > >> > page
> > > > > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> > visible
> > > > > once
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > next
> > > > > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
> > with a
> > > > > suffix
> > > > > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> > > create
> > > > > >> > > readme.io <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > > > >> td10868.html
> > > > > >> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-
> consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > > > >> > td10868.html>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > > > > >> > <[hidden email]
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis
> Magda <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> > merged
> > > > > into
> > > > > >> 1.8
> > > > > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > > > overall
> > > > > >> merge
> > > > > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
> > DML
> > > > they
> > > > > >> will
> > > > > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in
> doing
> > > that
> > > > > >> before
> > > > > >> > > DML
> > > > > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> > > merge
> > > > my
> > > > > >> > > changes
> > > > > >> > > >>>> and check
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
> > tests
> > > > and
> > > > > >> > > examples
> > > > > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > > > >> > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > > > CacheEntryProcessor
> > > > > >> > binary
> > > > > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that
> for
> > > 1.8.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> > > can.
> > > > > But I
> > > > > >> > > can't
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > > > changes
> > > > > >> into
> > > > > >> > > 1.8
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > > > > documentation
> > > > > >> > > and be
> > > > > >> > > >>>> sure
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> > > .NET
> > > > > >> > usability
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the
> Apache
> > > > Ignite
> > > > > >> > users?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> > <
> > > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > > [hidden email]
> > > > > >> > > <mailto:
> > > > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
> > who
> > > > can
> > > > > >> take
> > > > > >> > > over
> > > > > >> > > >>>> the
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > > > > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > > > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
> > is
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > >> > > about
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> > specify
> > > > > >> > streamer's
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > > > > easily).
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> > binary
> > > > > hash
> > > > > >> > codes
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > > > branch,
> > > > > I
> > > > > >> > will
> > > > > >> > > ask
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests
> live
> > in
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > > > follows:
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
> > version
> > > of
> > > > > auto
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test
> these
> > > very
> > > > > >> > hashing
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > > > passed.
> > > > > So
> > > > > >> > > could
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current
> code.
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> С уважением,
> Машенков Андрей Владимирович
> Тел. +7-921-932-61-82
>
> Best regards,
> Andrey V. Mashenkov
> Cerr: +7-921-932-61-82
>

Roman Shtykh

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Vladimir,

IGNITE-3066 Set of Redis commands.

Roman

On Friday, November 25, 2016 11:57 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
IGNITE-4249: ODBC latency improved.
IGNITE-3587: Added Distributed Joins support for ODBC.
IGNITE-3390: Added DSN support for ODBC.

Best Regards,
Igor

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Andrey Mashenkov <
[hidden email]> wrote:

dmagda

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

In reply to this post by Vladimir Ozerov

In addition to DML, ODBC+DML support and .NET features that have been already listed by Pavel, we will release the first version of Redis protocol implementation contributed by Roman
http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/redis <http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/redis>

—
Denis

> On Nov 25, 2016, at 5:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
>> unclear points
>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
>> that case why do not make one module?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>
>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>>>
>>> - Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
>>> because
>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>
>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>> [hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
>>> problems
>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
>> now
>>> we
>>>>>> have some
>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
>> There
>>>>> is a
>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
>> Can I
>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
>> good
>>> to
>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>>> features
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>> [hidden email]
>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
>>> that
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
>>> 1.8
>>>>> as
>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>> Recently
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>>>>> related
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
>>> hidden
>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
>>> once
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>> <[hidden email]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
>>> into
>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>> overall
>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
>> they
>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
>>>>> before
>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
>> my
>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
>> and
>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
>>> But I
>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>> changes
>>>>> into
>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>> documentation
>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>> Ignite
>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
>> can
>>>>> take
>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
>>> mostly
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
>>> hash
>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>> branch,
>>> I
>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>> passed.
>>> So
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com
>>

dmagda

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

In reply to this post by al.psc

Alexander,

I’ll encourage you to close DML example related ticket under 1.8 release as well
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4017 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4017>

Otherwise the users will hard time trying to figure out how to set up gears and use DML in practice.

—
Denis

> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:37 AM, Alexander Paschenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> 1.8 branch).
>
> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>
> - Alex
>
>
>
> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi
>>
>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message because
>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>
>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems
>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8
>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>>
>>> Vladimir.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Denis,
>>>>
>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
>>>> have some
>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There
>>> is a
>>>> ticket for
>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Igor
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>
>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>
>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
>>>> start
>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>
>>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features
>>> on
>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that
>>> we
>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>>> remaining
>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8
>>> as
>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
>>>> there
>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>>> related
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
>>>> page
>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once
>>> the
>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>> td10868.html
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>> <[hidden email]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into
>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall
>>> merge
>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they
>>> will
>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
>>> before
>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes
>>> into
>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite
>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can
>>> take
>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash
>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I
>>>> will
>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com

Alexey Kuznetsov

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

In reply to this post by dmagda

Vladimir,

IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on cluster
and their metrics.

--
Alexey Kuznetsov

Sergey Kozlov

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Hi

There's update for DML testing and binary package:

IGNITE-4321 Cassandra modules
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4321>
IGNITE-4323 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT .. FROM statement causes
IgniteException: Wrong value has been set
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4323>

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Vladimir,
>
> IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on cluster
> and their metrics.
>
> --
> Alexey Kuznetsov
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

al.psc

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

DML is done as for now, example is done too, currently there's no open
issues related with it (besides documentation which I'm working on).
Yesterday's problem turned out to be binary/SQL engine (pre DML)
related and is currently in won't fix state as agreed with Vlad, I've
created issues detailing it.

- Alex

2016-11-28 21:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:

> Hi
>
> There's update for DML testing and binary package:
>
> IGNITE-4321 Cassandra modules
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4321>
> IGNITE-4323 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT .. FROM statement causes
> IgniteException: Wrong value has been set
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4323>
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Vladimir,
>>
>> IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on cluster
>> and their metrics.
>>
>> --
>> Alexey Kuznetsov
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com

dmagda

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Alexander,

Do you mean this issue recently opened by you?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331>

How would it affect the overall user experience? Could you provide DML queries examples that won’t work due to the bug.

—
Denis

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Alexander Paschenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> DML is done as for now, example is done too, currently there's no open
> issues related with it (besides documentation which I'm working on).
> Yesterday's problem turned out to be binary/SQL engine (pre DML)
> related and is currently in won't fix state as agreed with Vlad, I've
> created issues detailing it.
>
> - Alex
>
> 2016-11-28 21:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi
>>
>> There's update for DML testing and binary package:
>>
>> IGNITE-4321 Cassandra modules
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4321>
>> IGNITE-4323 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT .. FROM statement causes
>> IgniteException: Wrong value has been set
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4323>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Vladimir,
>>>
>>> IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on cluster
>>> and their metrics.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexey Kuznetsov
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com

al.psc

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Denis,

See the comment to issue. Note that this affects DML in case of INSERT
from subquery with specific returned column result types AND aside of
DML affects SELECTs - the user isn't able to retrieve exactly what
they have put to cache as some object's field. However, according to
Vlad, arrays of wrappers are seldom present in real SQL related use
cases, so there's little to worry about.

- Alex

2016-11-29 20:21 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email]>:

> Alexander,
>
> Do you mean this issue recently opened by you?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331>
>
> How would it affect the overall user experience? Could you provide DML queries examples that won’t work due to the bug.
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Alexander Paschenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> DML is done as for now, example is done too, currently there's no open
>> issues related with it (besides documentation which I'm working on).
>> Yesterday's problem turned out to be binary/SQL engine (pre DML)
>> related and is currently in won't fix state as agreed with Vlad, I've
>> created issues detailing it.
>>
>> - Alex
>>
>> 2016-11-28 21:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> There's update for DML testing and binary package:
>>>
>>> IGNITE-4321 Cassandra modules
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4321>
>>> IGNITE-4323 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT .. FROM statement causes
>>> IgniteException: Wrong value has been set
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4323>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>
>>>> IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on cluster
>>>> and their metrics.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alexey Kuznetsov
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>> GridGain Systems
>>> www.gridgain.com
>

dmagda

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Alexander,

Now I see, thanks. Ok, I would suggest fixing it under 2.0 and document this limitation on the DML page you have been working on.

—
Denis

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Alexander Paschenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Denis,
>
> See the comment to issue. Note that this affects DML in case of INSERT
> from subquery with specific returned column result types AND aside of
> DML affects SELECTs - the user isn't able to retrieve exactly what
> they have put to cache as some object's field. However, according to
> Vlad, arrays of wrappers are seldom present in real SQL related use
> cases, so there's little to worry about.
>
> - Alex
>
> 2016-11-29 20:21 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email]>:
>> Alexander,
>>
>> Do you mean this issue recently opened by you?
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331>
>>
>> How would it affect the overall user experience? Could you provide DML queries examples that won’t work due to the bug.
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Alexander Paschenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> DML is done as for now, example is done too, currently there's no open
>>> issues related with it (besides documentation which I'm working on).
>>> Yesterday's problem turned out to be binary/SQL engine (pre DML)
>>> related and is currently in won't fix state as agreed with Vlad, I've
>>> created issues detailing it.
>>>
>>> - Alex
>>>
>>> 2016-11-28 21:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> There's update for DML testing and binary package:
>>>>
>>>> IGNITE-4321 Cassandra modules
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4321>
>>>> IGNITE-4323 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT .. FROM statement causes
>>>> IgniteException: Wrong value has been set
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4323>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on cluster
>>>>> and their metrics.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alexey Kuznetsov
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>

Sergey Kozlov

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Denis

We've good progress for DML. But unlike the regular queries DML has
significantly more specific cases that required our attention. Though some
cases aren't bugs but they've another behavior than user can expect using
SQL-related experience.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Alexander,
>
> Now I see, thanks. Ok, I would suggest fixing it under 2.0 and document
> this limitation on the DML page you have been working on.
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Denis,
> >
> > See the comment to issue. Note that this affects DML in case of INSERT
> > from subquery with specific returned column result types AND aside of
> > DML affects SELECTs - the user isn't able to retrieve exactly what
> > they have put to cache as some object's field. However, according to
> > Vlad, arrays of wrappers are seldom present in real SQL related use
> > cases, so there's little to worry about.
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> > 2016-11-29 20:21 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email]>:
> >> Alexander,
> >>
> >> Do you mean this issue recently opened by you?
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331>
> >>
> >> How would it affect the overall user experience? Could you provide DML
> queries examples that won’t work due to the bug.
> >>
> >> —
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> DML is done as for now, example is done too, currently there's no open
> >>> issues related with it (besides documentation which I'm working on).
> >>> Yesterday's problem turned out to be binary/SQL engine (pre DML)
> >>> related and is currently in won't fix state as agreed with Vlad, I've
> >>> created issues detailing it.
> >>>
> >>> - Alex
> >>>
> >>> 2016-11-28 21:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> There's update for DML testing and binary package:
> >>>>
> >>>> IGNITE-4321 Cassandra modules
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4321>
> >>>> IGNITE-4323 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT .. FROM statement causes
> >>>> IgniteException: Wrong value has been set
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4323>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Vladimir,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on
> cluster
> >>>>> and their metrics.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Alexey Kuznetsov
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>
>
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

Sergey Kozlov

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Hi

The list of issues found today:

IGNITE-4334 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT FROM statement fails if copy from
partitioned to replicated cache
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4334>

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Denis
>
> We've good progress for DML. But unlike the regular queries DML has
> significantly more specific cases that required our attention. Though some
> cases aren't bugs but they've another behavior than user can expect using
> SQL-related experience.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Alexander,
>>
>> Now I see, thanks. Ok, I would suggest fixing it under 2.0 and document
>> this limitation on the DML page you have been working on.
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>> > On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Denis,
>> >
>> > See the comment to issue. Note that this affects DML in case of INSERT
>> > from subquery with specific returned column result types AND aside of
>> > DML affects SELECTs - the user isn't able to retrieve exactly what
>> > they have put to cache as some object's field. However, according to
>> > Vlad, arrays of wrappers are seldom present in real SQL related use
>> > cases, so there's little to worry about.
>> >
>> > - Alex
>> >
>> > 2016-11-29 20:21 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email]>:
>> >> Alexander,
>> >>
>> >> Do you mean this issue recently opened by you?
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4331>
>> >>
>> >> How would it affect the overall user experience? Could you provide DML
>> queries examples that won’t work due to the bug.
>> >>
>> >> —
>> >> Denis
>> >>
>> >>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> DML is done as for now, example is done too, currently there's no open
>> >>> issues related with it (besides documentation which I'm working on).
>> >>> Yesterday's problem turned out to be binary/SQL engine (pre DML)
>> >>> related and is currently in won't fix state as agreed with Vlad, I've
>> >>> created issues detailing it.
>> >>>
>> >>> - Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> 2016-11-28 21:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>> >>>> Hi
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There's update for DML testing and binary package:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> IGNITE-4321 Cassandra modules
>> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4321>
>> >>>> IGNITE-4323 DML: INSERT INTO SELECT .. FROM statement causes
>> >>>> IgniteException: Wrong value has been set
>> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4323>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <
>> [hidden email]>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Vladimir,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> IGNITE-3443 Implement collecting what SQL statements executed on
>> cluster
>> >>>>> and their metrics.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Alexey Kuznetsov
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Sergey Kozlov
>> >>>> GridGain Systems
>> >>>> www.gridgain.com
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

dmagda

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

In reply to this post by Vladimir Ozerov

Vladimir,

Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>

Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation is being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>

—
Denis

> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
>> unclear points
>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
>> that case why do not make one module?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>
>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>>>
>>> - Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
>>> because
>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>
>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>> [hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
>>> problems
>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
>> now
>>> we
>>>>>> have some
>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
>> There
>>>>> is a
>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
>> Can I
>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
>> good
>>> to
>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>>> features
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>> [hidden email]
>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
>>> that
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
>>> 1.8
>>>>> as
>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>> Recently
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>>>>> related
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
>>> hidden
>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
>>> once
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>> <[hidden email]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
>>> into
>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>> overall
>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
>> they
>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
>>>>> before
>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
>> my
>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
>> and
>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
>>> But I
>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>> changes
>>>>> into
>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>> documentation
>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>> Ignite
>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
>> can
>>>>> take
>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
>>> mostly
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
>>> hash
>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>> branch,
>>> I
>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>> passed.
>>> So
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com
>>

Sergey Kozlov

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Hi

Update for DML testing:

IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from previous
failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Vladimir,
>
> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>
> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation is
> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> > completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >
> > Vladimir.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
> >> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> following
> >> unclear points
> >> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> >> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store?
> In
> >> that case why do not make one module?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> >>> 1.8 branch).
> >>>
> >>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> >>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> >>>
> >>> - Alex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> >>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> >>> because
> >>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> >>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >>>>
> >>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >> [hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> >>> problems
> >>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> >>> ignite-1.8
> >>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> >>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
> >> now
> >>> we
> >>>>>> have some
> >>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> >> There
> >>>>> is a
> >>>>>> ticket for
> >>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alexander,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> >> Can I
> >>>>>> start
> >>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> >>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> >> good
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> >>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> >>> features
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> >> [hidden email]
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
> >>> that
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> >>>>> remaining
> >>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
> >>> 1.8
> >>>>> as
> >>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> >>>>> happen?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> >> [hidden email]
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> >> Recently
> >>>>>> there
> >>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> >>>>> related
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> >>>>>>> co-exist at
> >>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> >>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> >>> hidden
> >>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> >>> once
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> >>> suffix
> >>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> >>>>>>> readme.io <
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>> td10868.html
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>> td10868.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>>>>> <[hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> >>> into
> >>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> >> overall
> >>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> >>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> >> they
> >>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
> >>>>> before
> >>>>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
> >> my
> >>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> >> and
> >>>>>>> examples
> >>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> >> CacheEntryProcessor
> >>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
> >>> But I
> >>>>>>> can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> >> changes
> >>>>> into
> >>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> >>> documentation
> >>>>>>> and be
> >>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> >>>>>> usability
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> >> Ignite
> >>>>>> users?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> >> can
> >>>>> take
> >>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> >>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> >>> mostly
> >>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> >>>>>> streamer's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> >>> easily).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> >>> hash
> >>>>>> codes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> >> branch,
> >>> I
> >>>>>> will
> >>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> >> follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
> >>> auto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> >>>>>> hashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> >> passed.
> >>> So
> >>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sergey Kozlov
> >> GridGain Systems
> >> www.gridgain.com
> >>
>
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

dmagda

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP PDO side.

The first one is related to DML.
DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>

Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before 1.8 is sent for vote.

The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>

—
Denis

> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Update for DML testing:
>
> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from previous
> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Vladimir,
>>
>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>>
>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation is
>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>>>
>>> Vladimir.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
>> following
>>>> unclear points
>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store?
>> In
>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>>>>>
>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
>>>>> because
>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
>>>>> problems
>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
>>>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
>>>> now
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
>>>> There
>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
>>>> Can I
>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
>>>> good
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>>>>> features
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
>>>>> that
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>>>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>>>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>>>> Recently
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
>>>>> hidden
>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
>>>>> once
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
>>>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
>>>>> into
>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>>>> overall
>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
>>>> they
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>>>> changes
>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
>>>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
>>>> can
>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>>>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>>>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
>>>>> hash
>>>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>>>> branch,
>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
>>>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
>>>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>>>> passed.
>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com

Igor Sapego

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Denis,

I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already
resolved
by another fix made by Alexander.

For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.

[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
[2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347

Best Regards,
Igor

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP PDO
> side.
>
> The first one is related to DML.
> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>
> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>
> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor
> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Update for DML testing:
> >
> > IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> previous
> > failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Vladimir,
> >>
> >> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> >>
> >> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation is
> >> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> >>
> >> —
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Folks,
> >>>
> >>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> >>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >>>
> >>> Vladimir.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
> in
> >>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> >> following
> >>>> unclear points
> >>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> >>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store?
> >> In
> >>>> that case why do not make one module?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
> in
> >>>>> 1.8 branch).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> >>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> >>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> >>>>> because
> >>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> >>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> >>>>> problems
> >>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> >>>>> ignite-1.8
> >>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> next
> >>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
> >>>> now
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> have some
> >>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> >>>> There
> >>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>> ticket for
> >>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> >>>> Can I
> >>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> >>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> >>>> good
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> >>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> >>>>> features
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> >>>>>>> remaining
> >>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
> >>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> >>>>>>> happen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> >>>> Recently
> >>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> >>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> >>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> >>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> >>>>> hidden
> >>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> >>>>> once
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> >>>>> suffix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> >>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>> td10868.html
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> >>>>> into
> >>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> >>>> overall
> >>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> >>>> they
> >>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
> >>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
> >>>> my
> >>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> >>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> >>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
> >>>>> But I
> >>>>>>>>> can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> >>>> changes
> >>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> >>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>> and be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> >>>>>>>> usability
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> >>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>> users?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> >>>> can
> >>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> >>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> >>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> >>>>>>>> streamer's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> >>>>> easily).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> >>>>> hash
> >>>>>>>> codes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> >>>> branch,
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> >>>> follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
> >>>>> auto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> >>>>>>>> hashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> >>>> passed.
> >>>>> So
> >>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
>
>

Vladimir Ozerov

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Igniters,

I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like
we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks
pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340

Vladimir.

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Denis,
>
> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already
> resolved
> by another fix made by Alexander.
>
> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>
> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP
> PDO
> > side.
> >
> > The first one is related to DML.
> > DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> >
> > Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
> > 1.8 is sent for vote.
> >
> > The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor
> > S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> > ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Update for DML testing:
> > >
> > > IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> > previous
> > > failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Vladimir,
> > >>
> > >> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> > >>
> > >> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation
> is
> > >> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> > >>
> > >> —
> > >> Denis
> > >>
> > >>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Folks,
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets
> you
> > >>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Vladimir.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
> > in
> > >>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> > >> following
> > >>>> unclear points
> > >>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > >>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> ignite-cassandra-store?
> > >> In
> > >>>> that case why do not make one module?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
> > in
> > >>>>> 1.8 branch).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > >>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> > >>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> message
> > >>>>> because
> > >>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> >
> > >>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> several
> > >>>>> problems
> > >>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > >>>>> ignite-1.8
> > >>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> > next
> > >>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Any objections?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> But
> > >>>> now
> > >>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>> have some
> > >>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> > >>>> There
> > >>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>> ticket for
> > >>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> > >>>> Can I
> > >>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > >>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> > >>>> good
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > >>>>> features
> > >>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > >>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > >>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> seems
> > >>>>> that
> > >>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> > >>>>>>> remaining
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> for
> > >>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>> soon
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> > >>>>>>> happen?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > >>>> Recently
> > >>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> > >>>>>>> related
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> versions
> > >>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> the
> > >>>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> > >>>>> hidden
> > >>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> > >>>>> once
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> > >>>>> suffix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> create
> > >>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>> td10868.html
> > >>>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > >>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> > >>>>> into
> > >>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > >>>> overall
> > >>>>>>> merge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > >>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> > >>>> they
> > >>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> that
> > >>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>> DML
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> merge
> > >>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> > >>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>> examples
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > >>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> > >>>>>>>> binary
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> 1.8.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> can.
> > >>>>> But I
> > >>>>>>>>> can't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > >>>> changes
> > >>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > >>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>> and be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> .NET
> > >>>>>>>> usability
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > >>>> Ignite
> > >>>>>>>> users?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> > >>>> can
> > >>>>>>> take
> > >>>>>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > >>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> > >>>>> mostly
> > >>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> > >>>>>>>> streamer's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > >>>>> easily).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> > >>>>> hash
> > >>>>>>>> codes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > >>>> branch,
> > >>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>> ask
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > >>>> follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
> of
> > >>>>> auto
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> very
> > >>>>>>>> hashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > >>>> passed.
> > >>>>> So
> > >>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > GridGain Systems
> > > www.gridgain.com
> >
> >
>

dmagda

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Vladimir,

Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?

—
Denis

> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Igniters,
>
> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like
> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks
> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Denis,
>>
>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already
>> resolved
>> by another fix made by Alexander.
>>
>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>>
>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Igor
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP
>> PDO
>>> side.
>>>
>>> The first one is related to DML.
>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>>>
>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>>>
>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor
>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>>>
>>> —
>>> Denis
>>>
>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Update for DML testing:
>>>>
>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
>>> previous
>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>>>>>
>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation
>> is
>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>>>>>
>>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets
>> you
>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts
>>> in
>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
>>>>> following
>>>>>>> unclear points
>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
>> ignite-cassandra-store?
>>>>> In
>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
>>> in
>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
>> message
>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
>>>
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
>> several
>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
>>> next
>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
>> But
>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
>>>>>>> Can I
>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
>> seems
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>>>>>>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
>> for
>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>>>>>>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>>>>>>> Recently
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
>>>>>>>> hidden
>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
>>>>>>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
>> that
>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
>> merge
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
>> 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
>> can.
>>>>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
>> .NET
>>>>>>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
>>>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>>>>>>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
>>>>>>>> hash
>>>>>>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
>> of
>>>>>>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
>> very
>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>
>>>
>>

Sergey Kozlov

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Hi

Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!

I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:

IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
result from the right side
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Vladimir,
>
> Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Igniters,
> >
> > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like
> > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks
> > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> >
> > Vladimir.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Denis,
> >>
> >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
> already
> >> resolved
> >> by another fix made by Alexander.
> >>
> >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
> >>
> >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Igor
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP
> >> PDO
> >>> side.
> >>>
> >>> The first one is related to DML.
> >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> >>>
> >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
> >>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
> >>>
> >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
> Igor
> >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> >>>
> >>> —
> >>> Denis
> >>>
> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> Update for DML testing:
> >>>>
> >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> >>> previous
> >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Vladimir,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation
> >> is
> >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> —
> >>>>> Denis
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets
> >> you
> >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> [hidden email]
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
> parts
> >>> in
> >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> >>>>> following
> >>>>>>> unclear points
> >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> >> ignite-cassandra-store?
> >>>>> In
> >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
> merged
> >>> in
> >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> >> message
> >>>>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> >> several
> >>>>>>>> problems
> >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
> >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> >>> next
> >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> >> [hidden email]
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> >> But
> >>>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>> have some
> >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
> them.
> >>>>>>> There
> >>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
> >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> >>>>>>> Can I
> >>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> >>>>>>> good
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
> >> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> >>>>>>>> features
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> >> seems
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> >>>>>>>>>> remaining
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> >> for
> >>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
> might
> >>>>>>>>>> happen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> >>>>>>> Recently
> >>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> difficulties
> >>>>>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> >> versions
> >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> >>>>>>>> hidden
> >>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> visible
> >>>>>>>> once
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with
> a
> >>>>>>>> suffix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> >> create
> >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
> >>>>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> merged
> >>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> >>>>>>> overall
> >>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> >>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> >> that
> >>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>> DML
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> >> merge
> >>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
> tests
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> examples
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> >>>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> >> 1.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> >> can.
> >>>>>>>> But I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> >>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> >>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> >> .NET
> >>>>>>>>>>> usability
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> >>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>> users?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> >>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> >>>>>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> specify
> >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> >>>>>>>> easily).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> binary
> >>>>>>>> hash
> >>>>>>>>>>> codes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> >>>>>>> branch,
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> >>>>>>> follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
> >> of
> >>>>>>>> auto
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> >> very
> >>>>>>>>>>> hashing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> >>>>>>> passed.
> >>>>>>>> So
> >>>>>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> >>>> GridGain Systems
> >>>> www.gridgain.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

dsetrakyan

Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for
all the fixes you are making?

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
>
> I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release:
>
> IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the
> result from the right side
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it?
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks
> like
> > > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which
> looks
> > > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> > > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> > >
> > > Vladimir.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Denis,
> > >>
> > >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was
> > already
> > >> resolved
> > >> by another fix made by Alexander.
> > >>
> > >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
> > >>
> > >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
> > >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Igor
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from
> PHP
> > >> PDO
> > >>> side.
> > >>>
> > >>> The first one is related to DML.
> > >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
> > >>>
> > >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue
> before
> > >>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
> > >>>
> > >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only.
> > Igor
> > >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
> > >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in
> DSN <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
> > >>>
> > >>> —
> > >>> Denis
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Update for DML testing:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
> > >>> previous
> > >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
> > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Vladimir,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote
> computation
> > >> is
> > >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
> > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
> > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> —
> > >>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable
> tickets
> > >> you
> > >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
> > parts
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> > >>>>> following
> > >>>>>>> unclear points
> > >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
> > >> ignite-cassandra-store?
> > >>>>> In
> > >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
> > merged
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
> fixed).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]
> >:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> > >> message
> > >>>>>>>> because
> > >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/
> > jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports
> > >> several
> > >>>>>>>> problems
> > >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization
> in
> > >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for
> the
> > >>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> > >> But
> > >>>>>>> now
> > >>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>> have some
> > >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on
> > them.
> > >>>>>>> There
> > >>>>>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related
> changes?
> > >>>>>>> Can I
> > >>>>>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.
> io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is
> now
> > >>>>>>> good
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes
> will
> > >> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > >>>>>>>> features
> > >>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
> (shortly):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> > >> seems
> > >>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
> biggest
> > >>>>>>>>>> remaining
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> > >> for
> > >>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
> > might
> > >>>>>>>>>> happen?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > >>>>>>> Recently
> > >>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> > difficulties
> > >>>>>>>>>> related
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> > >> versions
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to
> create a
> > >>>>>>>> hidden
> > >>>>>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> > visible
> > >>>>>>>> once
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> next
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
> with
> > a
> > >>>>>>>> suffix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> > >> create
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> > merged
> > >>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > >>>>>>> overall
> > >>>>>>>>>> merge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > >>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
> DML
> > >>>>>>> they
> > >>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> > >> that
> > >>>>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> DML
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> > >> merge
> > >>>>>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
> > tests
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> examples
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
> > >>>>>>>>>>> binary
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> > >> 1.8.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> > >> can.
> > >>>>>>>> But I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > >>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > >>>>>>>> documentation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> > >> .NET
> > >>>>>>>>>>> usability
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > >>>>>>> Ignite
> > >>>>>>>>>>> users?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
> who
> > >>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>> take
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
> is
> > >>>>>>>> mostly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> > specify
> > >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > >>>>>>>> easily).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> > binary
> > >>>>>>>> hash
> > >>>>>>>>>>> codes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > >>>>>>> branch,
> > >>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ask
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
> > in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > >>>>>>> follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
> version
> > >> of
> > >>>>>>>> auto
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> > >> very
> > >>>>>>>>>>> hashing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > >>>>>>> passed.
> > >>>>>>>> So
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > >>>> GridGain Systems
> > >>>> www.gridgain.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>

1234