Apache Ignite 1.8 Release

[Roman Shtykh]

Denis,
Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
-Roman
    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
 

 Igor,

It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8 then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge happens.

—
Denis

> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Denis,
>
> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will break tests
> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML is merged.
>
> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes and check
> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples are ready.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary mode)
> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>
> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
> > *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >
> > When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
> > branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be sure
> > that everything works as described on my side.
> >
> > *Pavel,*
> >
> > Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
> > tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over the
> > release process of 1.8?
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >
> > Current status on DML:
> >
> > - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
> > configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
> > batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> >
> > - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >
> > - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
> > generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
> > him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> >    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> > hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
> > features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
> > you please take a look?
> >
> > - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

   

[dmagda]

Roman,

That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at the same time.

It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next version is created after the release.

The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io <http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.

[1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>

—
Denis

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Denis,
> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> -Roman
>    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> Igor,
>
> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8 then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge happens.
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Denis,
>>
>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will break tests
>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML is merged.
>>
>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes and check
>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples are ready.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Igor
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary mode)
>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>
>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>
>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be sure
>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>
>>> *Pavel,*
>>>
>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>
>>> —
>>> Denis
>>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over the
>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>
>>> —
>>> Denis
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Current status on DML:
>>>
>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>>>
>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>
>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
>>> you please take a look?
>>>
>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>
>>> - Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Igniters,

I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we are
pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as soon
as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?

Vladimir.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Roman,
>
> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was
> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at
> the same time.
>
> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation
> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next
> version is created after the release.
>
> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io <
> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>
> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Denis,
> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > -Roman
> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Igor,
> >
> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
> happens.
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Denis,
> >>
> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
> break tests
> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML
> is merged.
> >>
> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes
> and check
> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples
> are ready.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Igor
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
> mode)
> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>
> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>
> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be
> sure
> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>
> >>> *Pavel,*
> >>>
> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>
> >>> —
> >>> Denis
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:
> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over
> the
> >>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>
> >>> —
> >>> Denis
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Current status on DML:
> >>>
> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> >>>
> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>
> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
> >>> you please take a look?
> >>>
> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>>
> >>> - Alex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

[al.psc]

Vlad,

Most likely today.

- Alex

2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:

> Igniters,
>
> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we are
> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as soon
> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
>
> Vladimir.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Roman,
>>
>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was
>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at
>> the same time.
>>
>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation
>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next
>> version is created after the release.
>>
>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io <
>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>
>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Denis,
>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>> > -Roman
>> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Igor,
>> >
>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
>> happens.
>> >
>> > —
>> > Denis
>> >
>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Denis,
>> >>
>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
>> break tests
>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML
>> is merged.
>> >>
>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes
>> and check
>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples
>> are ready.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Igor
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
>> mode)
>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>> >>
>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> >>>
>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be
>> sure
>> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
>> >>>
>> >>> *Pavel,*
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> >>>
>> >>> —
>> >>> Denis
>> >>>
>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:
>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over
>> the
>> >>> release process of 1.8?
>> >>>
>> >>> —
>> >>> Denis
>> >>>
>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> >>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Current status on DML:
>> >>>
>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>> >>>
>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>> >>>
>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
>> >>> you please take a look?
>> >>>
>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>> >>>
>> >>> - Alex
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>

[al.psc]

Folks,

Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.

Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.

Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269

On failing tests:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?focusedCommentId=15683377

- Alex

2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
<[hidden email]>:

> Vlad,
>
> Most likely today.
>
> - Alex
>
> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
>> Igniters,
>>
>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we are
>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as soon
>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
>>
>> Vladimir.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Roman,
>>>
>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was
>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at
>>> the same time.
>>>
>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation
>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next
>>> version is created after the release.
>>>
>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io <
>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>
>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>>>
>>> —
>>> Denis
>>>
>>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Denis,
>>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>> > -Roman
>>> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Igor,
>>> >
>>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
>>> happens.
>>> >
>>> > —
>>> > Denis
>>> >
>>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Denis,
>>> >>
>>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
>>> break tests
>>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML
>>> is merged.
>>> >>
>>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes
>>> and check
>>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples
>>> are ready.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Igor
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
>>> mode)
>>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
>>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>> >>
>>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>> >>>
>>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
>>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be
>>> sure
>>> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> *Pavel,*
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
>>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> —
>>> >>> Denis
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:
>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over
>>> the
>>> >>> release process of 1.8?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> —
>>> >>> Denis
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>> >>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Current status on DML:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
>>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
>>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
>>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
>>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>>> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
>>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
>>> >>> you please take a look?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Alex
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Hi Alex,
That is very good news! I created branch *ignite-1.8* and merged your
changes there. Thank you for contribution!

Igniters,
Let's finalize all remaining tickets in the scope of *ignite-1.8 *branch.
Hopefully we will be ready for vote in several days.

Vladimir.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>
> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>
> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>
> On failing tests:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> focusedCommentId=15683377
>
> - Alex
>
> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> <[hidden email]>:
> > Vlad,
> >
> > Most likely today.
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> > 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
> >> Igniters,
> >>
> >> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we
> are
> >> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
> >> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as
> soon
> >> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
> >>
> >> Vladimir.
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Roman,
> >>>
> >>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there
> was
> >>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
> >>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist
> at
> >>> the same time.
> >>>
> >>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> documentation
> >>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
> >>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the
> next
> >>> version is created after the release.
> >>>
> >>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
> >>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> readme.io <
> >>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
> >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
> >>>
> >>> —
> >>> Denis
> >>>
> >>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[hidden email]
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Denis,
> >>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >>> > -Roman
> >>> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Igor,
> >>> >
> >>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
> >>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
> >>> happens.
> >>> >
> >>> > —
> >>> > Denis
> >>> >
> >>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Denis,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
> >>> break tests
> >>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before
> DML
> >>> is merged.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
> changes
> >>> and check
> >>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
> examples
> >>> are ready.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Best Regards,
> >>> >> Igor
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> [hidden email]
> >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
> >>> mode)
> >>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> >>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
> can't
> >>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into
> 1.8
> >>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
> and be
> >>> sure
> >>> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> *Pavel,*
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
> >>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> —
> >>> >>> Denis
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> <mailto:
> >>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take
> over
> >>> the
> >>> >>> release process of 1.8?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> —
> >>> >>> Denis
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>> >>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Current status on DML:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
> about
> >>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
> >>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
> >>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will
> ask
> >>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> >>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> >>> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> >>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
> >>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
> could
> >>> >>> you please take a look?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> - Alex
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
>

[Sergey Kozlov]

Hi

I've started the testing of the key feature introducing for 1.8: DML

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Alex,
> That is very good news! I created branch *ignite-1.8* and merged your
> changes there. Thank you for contribution!
>
> Igniters,
> Let's finalize all remaining tickets in the scope of *ignite-1.8 *branch.
> Hopefully we will be ready for vote in several days.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >
> > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >
> > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
> > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >
> > On failing tests:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > focusedCommentId=15683377
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > <[hidden email]>:
> > > Vlad,
> > >
> > > Most likely today.
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > > 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
> > >> Igniters,
> > >>
> > >> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we
> > are
> > >> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
> > >> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as
> > soon
> > >> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
> > >>
> > >> Vladimir.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Roman,
> > >>>
> > >>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there
> > was
> > >>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related
> to
> > >>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> co-exist
> > at
> > >>> the same time.
> > >>>
> > >>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> > documentation
> > >>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
> page
> > >>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the
> > next
> > >>> version is created after the release.
> > >>>
> > >>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
> > >>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> > readme.io <
> > >>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html
> <
> > >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
> > >>>
> > >>> —
> > >>> Denis
> > >>>
> > >>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> <[hidden email]
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Denis,
> > >>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>> > -Roman
> > >>> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Igor,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
> > >>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
> > >>> happens.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > —
> > >>> > Denis
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Denis,
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
> > >>> break tests
> > >>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before
> > DML
> > >>> is merged.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
> > changes
> > >>> and check
> > >>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
> > examples
> > >>> are ready.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Best Regards,
> > >>> >> Igor
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
> binary
> > >>> mode)
> > >>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> > >>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
> > can't
> > >>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> > >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into
> > 1.8
> > >>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
> > and be
> > >>> sure
> > >>> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> *Pavel,*
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> usability
> > >>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite
> users?
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> —
> > >>> >>> Denis
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> > <mailto:
> > >>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take
> > over
> > >>> the
> > >>> >>> release process of 1.8?
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> —
> > >>> >>> Denis
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>> >>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Current status on DML:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
> > about
> > >>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> streamer's
> > >>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash
> codes
> > >>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I
> will
> > ask
> > >>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > >>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> > >>> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> > >>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> hashing
> > >>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
> > could
> > >>> >>> you please take a look?
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> - Alex
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

[al.psc]

Regarding failing tests mentioned in IGNITE-4280
(IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite related ones): reason found
(incorrect handling of old configurations where QueryEntities don't
have keyFields field), working on the patch.

- Alex

2016-11-23 16:01 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:

> Hi
>
> I've started the testing of the key feature introducing for 1.8: DML
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>> That is very good news! I created branch *ignite-1.8* and merged your
>> changes there. Thank you for contribution!
>>
>> Igniters,
>> Let's finalize all remaining tickets in the scope of *ignite-1.8 *branch.
>> Hopefully we will be ready for vote in several days.
>>
>> Vladimir.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
>> > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>> >
>> > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>> > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>> >
>> > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
>> > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>> >
>> > On failing tests:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>> > focusedCommentId=15683377
>> >
>> > - Alex
>> >
>> > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>> > <[hidden email]>:
>> > > Vlad,
>> > >
>> > > Most likely today.
>> > >
>> > > - Alex
>> > >
>> > > 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
>> > >> Igniters,
>> > >>
>> > >> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we
>> > are
>> > >> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
>> > >> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as
>> > soon
>> > >> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
>> > >>
>> > >> Vladimir.
>> > >>
>> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Roman,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there
>> > was
>> > >>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related
>> to
>> > >>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
>> co-exist
>> > at
>> > >>> the same time.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>> > documentation
>> > >>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
>> page
>> > >>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the
>> > next
>> > >>> version is created after the release.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>> > >>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
>> > readme.io <
>> > >>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html
>> <
>> > >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> —
>> > >>> Denis
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>> <[hidden email]
>> > >
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Denis,
>> > >>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>> > >>> > -Roman
>> > >>> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Igor,
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
>> > >>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
>> > >>> happens.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > —
>> > >>> > Denis
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Denis,
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
>> > >>> break tests
>> > >>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before
>> > DML
>> > >>> is merged.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
>> > changes
>> > >>> and check
>> > >>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
>> > examples
>> > >>> are ready.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Best Regards,
>> > >>> >> Igor
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>> > [hidden email]
>> > >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > >>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
>> binary
>> > >>> mode)
>> > >>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>> > >>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
>> > can't
>> > >>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> > >>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>> > >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into
>> > 1.8
>> > >>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
>> > and be
>> > >>> sure
>> > >>> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> *Pavel,*
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
>> usability
>> > >>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite
>> users?
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> > >>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> —
>> > >>> >>> Denis
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>> > <mailto:
>> > >>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take
>> > over
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> >>> release process of 1.8?
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> —
>> > >>> >>> Denis
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >>> >>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>> > >>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> Current status on DML:
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
>> > about
>> > >>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>> streamer's
>> > >>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash
>> codes
>> > >>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I
>> will
>> > ask
>> > >>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>> > >>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>> > >>> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> > >>> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> > >>> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> > >>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>> > >>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
>> hashing
>> > >>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
>> > could
>> > >>> >>> you please take a look?
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Alex
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com

[dmagda]

Alexander,

Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!

Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I start testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?

[1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>

—
Denis
 

> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>
> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>
> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>
> On failing tests:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?focusedCommentId=15683377
>
> - Alex
>
> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> <[hidden email]>:
>> Vlad,
>>
>> Most likely today.
>>
>> - Alex
>>
>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
>>> Igniters,
>>>
>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we are
>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as soon
>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
>>>
>>> Vladimir.
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Roman,
>>>>
>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was
>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at
>>>> the same time.
>>>>
>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation
>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next
>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>
>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io <
>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Denis,
>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>
>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
>>>> happens.
>>>>>
>>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
>>>> break tests
>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML
>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes
>>>> and check
>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples
>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
>>>> mode)
>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be
>>>> sure
>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto:
>>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over
>>>> the
>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

[Igor Sapego]

Denis,

I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
have some
failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There is a
ticket for
that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288

Best Regards,
Igor

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Alexander,
>
> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>
> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I start
> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>
> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >
> > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >
> > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
> > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >
> > On failing tests:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> focusedCommentId=15683377
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > <[hidden email]>:
> >> Vlad,
> >>
> >> Most likely today.
> >>
> >> - Alex
> >>
> >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
> >>> Igniters,
> >>>
> >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we
> are
> >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
> >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as
> soon
> >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
> >>>
> >>> Vladimir.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Roman,
> >>>>
> >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there
> was
> >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
> >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> co-exist at
> >>>> the same time.
> >>>>
> >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> documentation
> >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
> >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the
> next
> >>>> version is created after the release.
> >>>>
> >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
> >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> readme.io <
> >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
> >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>> Denis
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[hidden email]
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Denis,
> >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >>>>> -Roman
> >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Igor,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
> >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
> >>>> happens.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> —
> >>>>> Denis
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Denis,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
> >>>> break tests
> >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before
> DML
> >>>> is merged.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
> changes
> >>>> and check
> >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
> examples
> >>>> are ready.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>> Igor
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> [hidden email]
> >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
> >>>> mode)
> >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
> can't
> >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into
> 1.8
> >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
> and be
> >>>> sure
> >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
> >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> <mailto:
> >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take
> over
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
> about
> >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
> >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
> >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will
> ask
> >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
> >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
> could
> >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
>

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Folks,

DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems
with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8
branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
release (1.9, 2.0?).

Any objections?

Vladimir.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Denis,
>
> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
> have some
> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There is a
> ticket for
> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Alexander,
> >
> > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >
> > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
> start
> > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >
> > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >
> > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >
> > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
> > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >
> > > On failing tests:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > <[hidden email]>:
> > >> Vlad,
> > >>
> > >> Most likely today.
> > >>
> > >> - Alex
> > >>
> > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
> > >>> Igniters,
> > >>>
> > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we
> > are
> > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
> > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as
> > soon
> > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
> > >>>
> > >>> Vladimir.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Roman,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
> there
> > was
> > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related
> to
> > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> > co-exist at
> > >>>> the same time.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> > documentation
> > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
> page
> > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the
> > next
> > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
> > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> > readme.io <
> > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html
> <
> > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> td10868.html>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> —
> > >>>> Denis
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> <[hidden email]
> > >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>>>> -Roman
> > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Igor,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
> > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
> > >>>> happens.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> —
> > >>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
> > >>>> break tests
> > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before
> > DML
> > >>>> is merged.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
> > changes
> > >>>> and check
> > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
> > examples
> > >>>> are ready.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
> binary
> > >>>> mode)
> > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
> > can't
> > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into
> > 1.8
> > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
> > and be
> > >>>> sure
> > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> usability
> > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite
> users?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> > <mailto:
> > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take
> > over
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
> > about
> > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> streamer's
> > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash
> codes
> > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I
> will
> > ask
> > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> hashing
> > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
> > could
> > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> >
>

[Sergey Kozlov]

Hi

I found two issues for 1.8:
IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message because
node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>

Could someone experienced take a look?

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems
> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8
> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>
> Any objections?
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Denis,
> >
> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
> > have some
> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There
> is a
> > ticket for
> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > Alexander,
> > >
> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >
> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
> > start
> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >
> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >
> > > —
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > > >
> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > > >
> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features
> on
> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > >
> > > > On failing tests:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > >
> > > > - Alex
> > > >
> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> > > >> Vlad,
> > > >>
> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that
> we
> > > are
> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> remaining
> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8
> as
> > > soon
> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> happen?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
> > there
> > > was
> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> related
> > to
> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> > > co-exist at
> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> > > documentation
> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
> > page
> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once
> the
> > > next
> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> > > readme.io <
> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> td10868.html
> > <
> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > td10868.html>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> —
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > <[hidden email]
> > > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into
> 1.8
> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall
> merge
> > > >>>> happens.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> —
> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they
> will
> > > >>>> break tests
> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
> before
> > > DML
> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
> > > changes
> > > >>>> and check
> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
> > > examples
> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
> > binary
> > > >>>> mode)
> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
> > > can't
> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes
> into
> > > 1.8
> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
> > > and be
> > > >>>> sure
> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> > usability
> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite
> > users?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> > > <mailto:
> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can
> take
> > > over
> > > >>>> the
> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
> > > about
> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> > streamer's
> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash
> > codes
> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I
> > will
> > > ask
> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> > hashing
> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
> > > could
> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

[al.psc]

IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
1.8 branch).

Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).

- Alex



2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:

> Hi
>
> I found two issues for 1.8:
> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message because
> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>
> Could someone experienced take a look?
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems
>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8
>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> Vladimir.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > Denis,
>> >
>> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
>> > have some
>> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There
>> is a
>> > ticket for
>> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Igor
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Alexander,
>> > >
>> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>> > >
>> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
>> > start
>> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>> > >
>> > > —
>> > > Denis
>> > >
>> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Folks,
>> > > >
>> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
>> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>> > > >
>> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>> > > >
>> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features
>> on
>> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>> > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>> > > >
>> > > > On failing tests:
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
>> > > >
>> > > > - Alex
>> > > >
>> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>> > > > <[hidden email]>:
>> > > >> Vlad,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Most likely today.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> - Alex
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>:
>> > > >>> Igniters,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that
>> we
>> > > are
>> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>> remaining
>> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8
>> as
>> > > soon
>> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>> happen?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Vladimir.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> Roman,
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
>> > there
>> > > was
>> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>> related
>> > to
>> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
>> > > co-exist at
>> > > >>>> the same time.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>> > > documentation
>> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
>> > page
>> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once
>> the
>> > > next
>> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
>> > > readme.io <
>> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> td10868.html
>> > <
>> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> > td10868.html>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> —
>> > > >>>> Denis
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>> > <[hidden email]
>> > > >
>> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Denis,
>> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>> > > >>>>> -Roman
>> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Igor,
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into
>> 1.8
>> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall
>> merge
>> > > >>>> happens.
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> —
>> > > >>>>> Denis
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Denis,
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they
>> will
>> > > >>>> break tests
>> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
>> before
>> > > DML
>> > > >>>> is merged.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
>> > > changes
>> > > >>>> and check
>> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
>> > > examples
>> > > >>>> are ready.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > > >>>>>> Igor
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>> > > [hidden email]
>> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
>> > binary
>> > > >>>> mode)
>> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I
>> > > can't
>> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes
>> into
>> > > 1.8
>> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation
>> > > and be
>> > > >>>> sure
>> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
>> > usability
>> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite
>> > users?
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> —
>> > > >>>>>>> Denis
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
>> > > <mailto:
>> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can
>> take
>> > > over
>> > > >>>> the
>> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> —
>> > > >>>>>>> Denis
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly
>> > > about
>> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>> > streamer's
>> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash
>> > codes
>> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I
>> > will
>> > > ask
>> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
>> > hashing
>> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So
>> > > could
>> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com

[Sergey Kozlov]

Hi

Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
unclear points
1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
that case why do not make one module?



On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> 1.8 branch).
>
> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>
> - Alex
>
>
>
> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > Hi
> >
> > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> because
> > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> >
> > Could someone experienced take a look?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> problems
> >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> ignite-1.8
> >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> >>
> >> Any objections?
> >>
> >> Vladimir.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Denis,
> >> >
> >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now
> we
> >> > have some
> >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There
> >> is a
> >> > ticket for
> >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Igor
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Alexander,
> >> > >
> >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >> > >
> >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
> >> > start
> >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >> > >
> >> > > —
> >> > > Denis
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Folks,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good
> to
> >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> features
> >> on
> >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On failing tests:
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Alex
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> >> > > >> Vlad,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Most likely today.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> - Alex
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]
> >:
> >> > > >>> Igniters,
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
> that
> >> we
> >> > > are
> >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> >> remaining
> >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
> 1.8
> >> as
> >> > > soon
> >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> >> happen?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>> Roman,
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
> >> > there
> >> > > was
> >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> >> related
> >> > to
> >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> >> > > co-exist at
> >> > > >>>> the same time.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> >> > > documentation
> >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> hidden
> >> > page
> >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> once
> >> the
> >> > > next
> >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> suffix
> >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> >> > > readme.io <
> >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >> td10868.html
> >> > <
> >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> >> > td10868.html>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> —
> >> > > >>>> Denis
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >> > <[hidden email]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >>>> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> into
> >> 1.8
> >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall
> >> merge
> >> > > >>>> happens.
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> —
> >> > > >>>>> Denis
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> [hidden email]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they
> >> will
> >> > > >>>> break tests
> >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
> >> before
> >> > > DML
> >> > > >>>> is merged.
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my
> >> > > changes
> >> > > >>>> and check
> >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and
> >> > > examples
> >> > > >>>> are ready.
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >> > > [hidden email]
> >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
> >> > binary
> >> > > >>>> mode)
> >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
> But I
> >> > > can't
> >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]
> >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes
> >> into
> >> > > 1.8
> >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> documentation
> >> > > and be
> >> > > >>>> sure
> >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> >> > usability
> >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite
> >> > users?
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> —
> >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]
> >> > > <mailto:
> >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can
> >> take
> >> > > over
> >> > > >>>> the
> >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> —
> >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> alexander.a.paschenko@
> >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> mostly
> >> > > about
> >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> >> > streamer's
> >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> easily).
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> hash
> >> > codes
> >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch,
> I
> >> > will
> >> > > ask
> >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
> >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
> auto
> >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> >> > hashing
> >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed.
> So
> >> > > could
> >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Folks,

I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
completed as a part of 1.8 release.

Vladimir.

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
> unclear points
> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
> that case why do not make one module?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> > 1.8 branch).
> >
> > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> > because
> > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > >
> > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> [hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Folks,
> > >>
> > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> > problems
> > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > ignite-1.8
> > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > >>
> > >> Any objections?
> > >>
> > >> Vladimir.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Denis,
> > >> >
> > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
> now
> > we
> > >> > have some
> > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> There
> > >> is a
> > >> > ticket for
> > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > Igor
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Alexander,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> Can I
> > >> > start
> > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > —
> > >> > > Denis
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Folks,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> good
> > to
> > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > features
> > >> on
> > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Alex
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> - Alex
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> [hidden email]
> > >:
> > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
> > that
> > >> we
> > >> > > are
> > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> > >> remaining
> > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
> > 1.8
> > >> as
> > >> > > soon
> > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> > >> happen?
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> Recently
> > >> > there
> > >> > > was
> > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> > >> related
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> > >> > > co-exist at
> > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> > >> > > documentation
> > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> > hidden
> > >> > page
> > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> > once
> > >> the
> > >> > > next
> > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> > suffix
> > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> > >> > > readme.io <
> > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >> td10868.html
> > >> > <
> > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >> > td10868.html>
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> —
> > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > >> > <[hidden email]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> > into
> > >> 1.8
> > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> overall
> > >> merge
> > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> —
> > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> they
> > >> will
> > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
> > >> before
> > >> > > DML
> > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
> my
> > >> > > changes
> > >> > > >>>> and check
> > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> and
> > >> > > examples
> > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >> > > [hidden email]
> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> CacheEntryProcessor
> > >> > binary
> > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
> > But I
> > >> > > can't
> > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > [hidden email]
> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> changes
> > >> into
> > >> > > 1.8
> > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > documentation
> > >> > > and be
> > >> > > >>>> sure
> > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> > >> > usability
> > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> Ignite
> > >> > users?
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > [hidden email]
> > >> > > <mailto:
> > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> can
> > >> take
> > >> > > over
> > >> > > >>>> the
> > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> > mostly
> > >> > > about
> > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> > >> > streamer's
> > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > easily).
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> > hash
> > >> > codes
> > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> branch,
> > I
> > >> > will
> > >> > > ask
> > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> follows:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
> > auto
> > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> > >> > hashing
> > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> passed.
> > So
> > >> > > could
> > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > GridGain Systems
> > > www.gridgain.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>

[Alexey Kuznetsov]

Sergey,

As far as I know "ignite-cassandra" is a root folder.

"ignite-cassandra-store" - contains module with Cassandra store.
"ignite-cassandra-serializers" - module that contains optional serializers
 for Cassandra store (for example with Kryo).
it is implemented as separate (optional) module because of Kryo based
serializers may bring not needed dependency.

Igor, could you confirm this?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
> unclear points
> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
> that case why do not make one module?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> > 1.8 branch).
> >
> > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> >
> > - Alex
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> > because
> > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > >
> > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> [hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Folks,
> > >>
> > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> > problems
> > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > ignite-1.8
> > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > >>
> > >> Any objections?
> > >>
> > >> Vladimir.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Denis,
> > >> >
> > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
> now
> > we
> > >> > have some
> > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> There
> > >> is a
> > >> > ticket for
> > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > Igor
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Alexander,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> Can I
> > >> > start
> > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > —
> > >> > > Denis
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Folks,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> good
> > to
> > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > features
> > >> on
> > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > - Alex
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> - Alex
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> [hidden email]
> > >:
> > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
> > that
> > >> we
> > >> > > are
> > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> > >> remaining
> > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
> > 1.8
> > >> as
> > >> > > soon
> > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> > >> happen?
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> Recently
> > >> > there
> > >> > > was
> > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> > >> related
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> > >> > > co-exist at
> > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> > >> > > documentation
> > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> > hidden
> > >> > page
> > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> > once
> > >> the
> > >> > > next
> > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> > suffix
> > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> > >> > > readme.io <
> > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >> td10868.html
> > >> > <
> > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > >> > td10868.html>
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> —
> > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > >> > <[hidden email]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> > into
> > >> 1.8
> > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> overall
> > >> merge
> > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>> —
> > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> they
> > >> will
> > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that
> > >> before
> > >> > > DML
> > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
> my
> > >> > > changes
> > >> > > >>>> and check
> > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> and
> > >> > > examples
> > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >> > > [hidden email]
> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> CacheEntryProcessor
> > >> > binary
> > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
> > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
> > But I
> > >> > > can't
> > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > [hidden email]
> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> changes
> > >> into
> > >> > > 1.8
> > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > documentation
> > >> > > and be
> > >> > > >>>> sure
> > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
> > >> > usability
> > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> Ignite
> > >> > users?
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > [hidden email]
> > >> > > <mailto:
> > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> can
> > >> take
> > >> > > over
> > >> > > >>>> the
> > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> > mostly
> > >> > > about
> > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> > >> > streamer's
> > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > easily).
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> > hash
> > >> > codes
> > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> branch,
> > I
> > >> > will
> > >> > > ask
> > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> follows:
> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of
> > auto
> > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very
> > >> > hashing
> > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> passed.
> > So
> > >> > > could
> > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>>
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > GridGain Systems
> > > www.gridgain.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>

--
Alexey Kuznetsov

[Sergey Kozlov]

Alexey

The optional module means that we can copy it in libs and it will provide
its functionality. What new functionality provides empty directory?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Sergey,
>
> As far as I know "ignite-cassandra" is a root folder.
>
> "ignite-cassandra-store" - contains module with Cassandra store.
> "ignite-cassandra-serializers" - module that contains optional serializers
>  for Cassandra store (for example with Kryo).
> it is implemented as separate (optional) module because of Kryo based
> serializers may bring not needed dependency.
>
> Igor, could you confirm this?
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
>> unclear points
>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
>> that case why do not make one module?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
>> > 1.8 branch).
>> >
>> > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>> > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
>> >
>> > - Alex
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I found two issues for 1.8:
>> > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
>> > because
>> > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
>> > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>> > >
>> > > Could someone experienced take a look?
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>> [hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Folks,
>> > >>
>> > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
>> > problems
>> > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
>> > ignite-1.8
>> > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>> > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>> > >>
>> > >> Any objections?
>> > >>
>> > >> Vladimir.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Denis,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
>> now
>> > we
>> > >> > have some
>> > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
>> There
>> > >> is a
>> > >> > ticket for
>> > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Best Regards,
>> > >> > Igor
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Alexander,
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
>> Can I
>> > >> > start
>> > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>> > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > —
>> > >> > > Denis
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Folks,
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
>> good
>> > to
>> > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>> > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
>> > features
>> > >> on
>> > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On failing tests:
>> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>> > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > - Alex
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>> > >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
>> > >> > > >> Vlad,
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Most likely today.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> - Alex
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
>> [hidden email]
>> > >:
>> > >> > > >>> Igniters,
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
>> > that
>> > >> we
>> > >> > > are
>> > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>> > >> remaining
>> > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
>> > 1.8
>> > >> as
>> > >> > > soon
>> > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>> > >> happen?
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
>> [hidden email]
>> > >
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>> Roman,
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
>> Recently
>> > >> > there
>> > >> > > was
>> > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>> > >> related
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
>> versions
>> > >> > > co-exist at
>> > >> > > >>>> the same time.
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>> > >> > > documentation
>> > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
>> > hidden
>> > >> > page
>> > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
>> > once
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > next
>> > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
>> > suffix
>> > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
>> create
>> > >> > > readme.io <
>> > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> > >> td10868.html
>> > >> > <
>> > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>> > >> > td10868.html>
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>> > >> > <[hidden email]
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
>> > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>> > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
>> > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
>> > into
>> > >> 1.8
>> > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
>> overall
>> > >> merge
>> > >> > > >>>> happens.
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>> > [hidden email]>
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
>> they
>> > >> will
>> > >> > > >>>> break tests
>> > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
>> that
>> > >> before
>> > >> > > DML
>> > >> > > >>>> is merged.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
>> merge my
>> > >> > > changes
>> > >> > > >>>> and check
>> > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
>> and
>> > >> > > examples
>> > >> > > >>>> are ready.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>> > >> > > [hidden email]
>> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
>> CacheEntryProcessor
>> > >> > binary
>> > >> > > >>>> mode)
>> > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
>> 1.8.
>> > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
>> > But I
>> > >> > > can't
>> > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > [hidden email]
>> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>> changes
>> > >> into
>> > >> > > 1.8
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>> > documentation
>> > >> > > and be
>> > >> > > >>>> sure
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET
>> > >> > usability
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>> Ignite
>> > >> > users?
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > [hidden email]
>> > >> > > <mailto:
>> > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
>> can
>> > >> take
>> > >> > > over
>> > >> > > >>>> the
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> —
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
>> > alexander.a.paschenko@
>> > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
>> > mostly
>> > >> > > about
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>> > >> > streamer's
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>> > easily).
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
>> > hash
>> > >> > codes
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>> branch,
>> > I
>> > >> > will
>> > >> > > ask
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
>> follows:
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
>> of
>> > auto
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
>> very
>> > >> > hashing
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>> passed.
>> > So
>> > >> > > could
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > > >>>>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Sergey Kozlov
>> > > GridGain Systems
>> > > www.gridgain.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Kuznetsov
>

--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

[Pavel Tupitsyn]

Noteworthy .NET features:

   - Entity Framework 2nd Level Cache
   - ASP.NET Session State Store Provider
   - Custom logger support
   - NLog logging
   - Log4net logging


On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
> > optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
> > unclear points
> > 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
> > that case why do not make one module?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> > > 1.8 branch).
> > >
> > > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> > > because
> > > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > > >
> > > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Folks,
> > > >>
> > > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> > > problems
> > > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > > ignite-1.8
> > > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> > > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > > >>
> > > >> Any objections?
> > > >>
> > > >> Vladimir.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Denis,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
> > now
> > > we
> > > >> > have some
> > > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> > There
> > > >> is a
> > > >> > ticket for
> > > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > >> > Igor
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Alexander,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> > Can I
> > > >> > start
> > > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > —
> > > >> > > Denis
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Folks,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> > good
> > > to
> > > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
> be
> > > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > > features
> > > >> on
> > > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > - Alex
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> > > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> - Alex
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >:
> > > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> seems
> > > that
> > > >> we
> > > >> > > are
> > > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> > > >> remaining
> > > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> for
> > > 1.8
> > > >> as
> > > >> > > soon
> > > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> > > >> happen?
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > Recently
> > > >> > there
> > > >> > > was
> > > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> > > >> related
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> versions
> > > >> > > co-exist at
> > > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> the
> > > >> > > documentation
> > > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> > > hidden
> > > >> > page
> > > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> > > once
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > next
> > > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> > > suffix
> > > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> create
> > > >> > > readme.io <
> > > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > >> td10868.html
> > > >> > <
> > > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > >> > td10868.html>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > > >> > <[hidden email]
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> > > into
> > > >> 1.8
> > > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > overall
> > > >> merge
> > > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> > they
> > > >> will
> > > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> that
> > > >> before
> > > >> > > DML
> > > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> merge
> > my
> > > >> > > changes
> > > >> > > >>>> and check
> > > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> > and
> > > >> > > examples
> > > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > >> > > [hidden email]
> > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > CacheEntryProcessor
> > > >> > binary
> > > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> 1.8.
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> can.
> > > But I
> > > >> > > can't
> > > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > changes
> > > >> into
> > > >> > > 1.8
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > > documentation
> > > >> > > and be
> > > >> > > >>>> sure
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> .NET
> > > >> > usability
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > Ignite
> > > >> > users?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >> > > <mailto:
> > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> > can
> > > >> take
> > > >> > > over
> > > >> > > >>>> the
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> > > mostly
> > > >> > > about
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> > > >> > streamer's
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > > easily).
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> > > hash
> > > >> > codes
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > branch,
> > > I
> > > >> > will
> > > >> > > ask
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > follows:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
> of
> > > auto
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> very
> > > >> > hashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > passed.
> > > So
> > > >> > > could
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
> >
>

[agura]

Vladimir,

IGNITE-2968 and IGNITE-2969 introduce deadlock detection for transactions
on near caches and for optimistic transactions.
I think it should be added to release notes.

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
> > optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following
> > unclear points
> > 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In
> > that case why do not make one module?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> > > 1.8 branch).
> > >
> > > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message
> > > because
> > > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > > >
> > > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Folks,
> > > >>
> > > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> > > problems
> > > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > > ignite-1.8
> > > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> > > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > > >>
> > > >> Any objections?
> > > >>
> > > >> Vladimir.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Denis,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But
> > now
> > > we
> > > >> > have some
> > > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> > There
> > > >> is a
> > > >> > ticket for
> > > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > >> > Igor
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Alexander,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> > Can I
> > > >> > start
> > > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > —
> > > >> > > Denis
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Folks,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> > good
> > > to
> > > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
> be
> > > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > > features
> > > >> on
> > > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > - Alex
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> > > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> - Alex
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >:
> > > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> seems
> > > that
> > > >> we
> > > >> > > are
> > > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> > > >> remaining
> > > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> for
> > > 1.8
> > > >> as
> > > >> > > soon
> > > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> > > >> happen?
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > Recently
> > > >> > there
> > > >> > > was
> > > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> > > >> related
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> versions
> > > >> > > co-exist at
> > > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> the
> > > >> > > documentation
> > > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a
> > > hidden
> > > >> > page
> > > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
> > > once
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > next
> > > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a
> > > suffix
> > > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> create
> > > >> > > readme.io <
> > > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > >> td10868.html
> > > >> > <
> > > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > >> > td10868.html>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > > >> > <[hidden email]
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
> > > into
> > > >> 1.8
> > > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > overall
> > > >> merge
> > > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
> > they
> > > >> will
> > > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> that
> > > >> before
> > > >> > > DML
> > > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> merge
> > my
> > > >> > > changes
> > > >> > > >>>> and check
> > > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
> > and
> > > >> > > examples
> > > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > >> > > [hidden email]
> > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > CacheEntryProcessor
> > > >> > binary
> > > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> 1.8.
> > > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> can.
> > > But I
> > > >> > > can't
> > > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > changes
> > > >> into
> > > >> > > 1.8
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > > documentation
> > > >> > > and be
> > > >> > > >>>> sure
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> .NET
> > > >> > usability
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > Ignite
> > > >> > users?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
> > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > >> > > <mailto:
> > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
> > can
> > > >> take
> > > >> > > over
> > > >> > > >>>> the
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is
> > > mostly
> > > >> > > about
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> > > >> > streamer's
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > > easily).
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
> > > hash
> > > >> > codes
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > branch,
> > > I
> > > >> > will
> > > >> > > ask
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > follows:
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
> of
> > > auto
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> very
> > > >> > hashing
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > passed.
> > > So
> > > >> > > could
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > > >>>>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergey Kozlov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
> >
>

[Andrew Mashenkov]

Vladimir,

IGNITE-3735: ODBC escape sequences support
IGNITE-3448: DISTINCT Aggregates support added
IGNITE-4145: Fixed race in distributed SQL queries
IGNITE-2974: ODBC NIO support

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Vladimir,
>
> IGNITE-2968 and IGNITE-2969 introduce deadlock detection for transactions
> on near caches and for optimistic transactions.
> I think it should be added to release notes.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you
> > completed as a part of 1.8 release.
> >
> > Vladimir.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in
> > > optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
> following
> > > unclear points
> > > 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
> > > 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store?
> In
> > > that case why do not make one module?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged
> in
> > > > 1.8 branch).
> > > >
> > > > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> > > > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> > > >
> > > > - Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > I found two issues for 1.8:
> > > > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send
> message
> > > > because
> > > > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
> > > > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
> > > > >
> > > > > Could someone experienced take a look?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Folks,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several
> > > > problems
> > > > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in
> > > > ignite-1.8
> > > > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the
> next
> > > > >> release (1.9, 2.0?).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Any objections?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Vladimir.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Denis,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8.
> But
> > > now
> > > > we
> > > > >> > have some
> > > > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them.
> > > There
> > > > >> is a
> > > > >> > ticket for
> > > > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Best Regards,
> > > > >> > Igor
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Alexander,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes?
> > > Can I
> > > > >> > start
> > > > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability
> <
> > > > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > —
> > > > >> > > Denis
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > > >> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Folks,
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now
> > > good
> > > > to
> > > > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will
> > be
> > > > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new
> > > > features
> > > > >> on
> > > > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases
> (shortly):
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On failing tests:
> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > - Alex
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > > >> > > > <[hidden email]>:
> > > > >> > > >> Vlad,
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> - Alex
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >:
> > > > >> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it
> > seems
> > > > that
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> > > are
> > > > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the
> biggest
> > > > >> remaining
> > > > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
> > for
> > > > 1.8
> > > > >> as
> > > > >> > > soon
> > > > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it
> might
> > > > >> happen?
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
> > > Recently
> > > > >> > there
> > > > >> > > was
> > > > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the
> difficulties
> > > > >> related
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
> > versions
> > > > >> > > co-exist at
> > > > >> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for
> > the
> > > > >> > > documentation
> > > > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create
> a
> > > > hidden
> > > > >> > page
> > > > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it
> visible
> > > > once
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > next
> > > > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
> with a
> > > > suffix
> > > > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
> > create
> > > > >> > > readme.io <
> > > > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > > >> td10868.html
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > > > >> > td10868.html>
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>> —
> > > > >> > > >>>> Denis
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > > > >> > <[hidden email]
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > > > >> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > > >> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
> merged
> > > > into
> > > > >> 1.8
> > > > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
> > > overall
> > > > >> merge
> > > > >> > > >>>> happens.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>> —
> > > > >> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
> > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
> DML
> > > they
> > > > >> will
> > > > >> > > >>>> break tests
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
> > that
> > > > >> before
> > > > >> > > DML
> > > > >> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to
> > merge
> > > my
> > > > >> > > changes
> > > > >> > > >>>> and check
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
> tests
> > > and
> > > > >> > > examples
> > > > >> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > > >> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET:
> > > CacheEntryProcessor
> > > > >> > binary
> > > > >> > > >>>> mode)
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
> > 1.8.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
> > can.
> > > > But I
> > > > >> > > can't
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
> <
> > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
> <
> > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > >> > > >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
> > > changes
> > > > >> into
> > > > >> > > 1.8
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
> > > > documentation
> > > > >> > > and be
> > > > >> > > >>>> sure
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
> > .NET
> > > > >> > usability
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
> > > Ignite
> > > > >> > users?
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
> <
> > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
> <
> > > > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > >> > > <mailto:
> > > > >> > > >>>> [hidden email]>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
> who
> > > can
> > > > >> take
> > > > >> > > over
> > > > >> > > >>>> the
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:
> > > > alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
> is
> > > > mostly
> > > > >> > > about
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to
> specify
> > > > >> > streamer's
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
> > > > easily).
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
> binary
> > > > hash
> > > > >> > codes
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
> > > branch,
> > > > I
> > > > >> > will
> > > > >> > > ask
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
> in
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
> > > follows:
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
> version
> > of
> > > > auto
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
> > very
> > > > >> > hashing
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
> > > passed.
> > > > So
> > > > >> > > could
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > >>>>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergey Kozlov
> > > GridGain Systems
> > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> >
>

--
С уважением,
Машенков Андрей Владимирович
Тел. [phone]

Best regards,
Andrey V. Mashenkov
Cerr: [phone]