1.5 GA

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
19 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

1.5 GA

dsetrakyan
Igniters,

Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
which were addressed or are being addressed.

Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?

D.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Romain Gilles-2
Hi Igniters,
Yes but could please provide a push that includes the ignite osgi stuffs?
Regards,

Romain

Le lun. 14 déc. 2015 à 07:27, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> a
écrit :

> Igniters,
>
> Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
> which were addressed or are being addressed.
>
> Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?
>
> D.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

yzhdanov
Romain,

osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build ignite
binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.

--Yakov

2015-12-14 12:21 GMT+03:00 Romain Gilles <[hidden email]>:

> Hi Igniters,
> Yes but could please provide a push that includes the ignite osgi stuffs?
> Regards,
>
> Romain
>
> Le lun. 14 déc. 2015 à 07:27, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> a
> écrit :
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
> > which were addressed or are being addressed.
> >
> > Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?
> >
> > D.
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

yzhdanov
In reply to this post by dsetrakyan
Guys,

Here is the list of open issues for 1.5
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.5%20AND%20status%20!%3D%20closed%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC

I see 58 items in this list, however 17 are resolved and 4 are in patch
available state.

The most critical issues are assigned to
Alexey Goncharuk
Semyon Boikov
Artem Shutak
Vladimir Ozerov
Pavel Tupitsyn
Vladimir Ershov

I think we can release GA when mentioned guys finish with their tickets. I
think this is possible to accomplish prior to Wed Dec 16 evening. Remaining
tickets can be moved further.

I also want to ask everyone having resolved tickets to look them through
and close or reassign properly:
Raul Kripalani
Cos Boudnik
Denis Magda
Igor Sapego

Thanks!

--Yakov

2015-12-14 9:26 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>:

> Igniters,
>
> Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
> which were addressed or are being addressed.
>
> Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?
>
> D.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Raul Kripalani
In reply to this post by yzhdanov
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build ignite
> binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
>

Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included OSGi.

Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built the
release from?

Thanks,

*Raúl Kripalani*
PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
Messaging Engineer
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Anton Vinogradov
Raul,

Tag 1.5.0-b1 fixed, please check.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Raul Kripalani <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build ignite
> > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >
>
> Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included OSGi.
>
> Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built the
> release from?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Raúl Kripalani*
> PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
> Messaging Engineer
> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Raul Kripalani
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Anton Vinogradov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Tag 1.5.0-b1 fixed, please check.
>

Looks much better now. Thanks!

*Raúl Kripalani*
PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
Messaging Engineer
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Konstantin Boudnik-2
In reply to this post by dsetrakyan
Oh, and by the way - can we please _never_ do another release that has a
version like "-b1" or something? It proved to be a royal PITA in the
downstream projects. For instance, in Bigtop we had to hack-off bits and
pieces to make sure the RPMs could be build ("-" isn't a valid symbol for RPM
version string); which later broke the Zeppelin build BIGTOP-2181.

If releases like this will keep on rolling out, we literally will be skipping
them in our releases, because of the huge amount of effort required to
accommodate these.

Regards,
  Cos

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:26PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
> which were addressed or are being addressed.
>
> Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?
>
> D.

signature.asc (237 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Konstantin Boudnik-2
In reply to this post by Raul Kripalani
Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?

Cos

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build ignite
> > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >
>
> Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included OSGi.
>
> Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built the
> release from?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Raúl Kripalani*
> PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
> Messaging Engineer
> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk

signature.asc (237 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

yzhdanov
Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
correct?

Yakov
On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
>
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build
> ignite
> > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> > >
> >
> > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included
> OSGi.
> >
> > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built
> the
> > release from?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
> > Messaging Engineer
> > http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Anton Vinogradov
Yakov,

ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3>
was
correct.
1.5.0-b1
<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3>
-
now correct too, was fixed.
Both (now) points to the same commit.

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> correct?
>
> Yakov
> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build
> > ignite
> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included
> > OSGi.
> > >
> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built
> > the
> > > release from?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data
> and
> > > Messaging Engineer
> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Anton Vinogradov
Cos,

I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no chances
for one more delay.
Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 & 1.x.0.final as
a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some other
case.

Raul & Sergi,

Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> Yakov,
>
> ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3> was
> correct.
> 1.5.0-b1
> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3> -
> now correct too, was fixed.
> Both (now) points to the same commit.
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
>> correct?
>>
>> Yakov
>> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
>> >
>> > Cos
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build
>> > ignite
>> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
>> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included
>> > OSGi.
>> > >
>> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built
>> > the
>> > > release from?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
>> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data
>> and
>> > > Messaging Engineer
>> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>> >
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Konstantin Boudnik-2
Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush and
produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.

There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion and
incompatibilities.

Cos

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:

> Cos,
>
> I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no chances
> for one more delay.
> Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 & 1.x.0.final as
> a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some other
> case.
>
> Raul & Sergi,
>
> Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <[hidden email]
> > wrote:
>
> > Yakov,
> >
> > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> > <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3> was
> > correct.
> > 1.5.0-b1
> > <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3> -
> > now correct too, was fixed.
> > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> >> correct?
> >>
> >> Yakov
> >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> >> >
> >> > Cos
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build
> >> > ignite
> >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included
> >> > OSGi.
> >> > >
> >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built
> >> > the
> >> > > release from?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data
> >> and
> >> > > Messaging Engineer
> >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >

signature.asc (237 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

dsetrakyan
I filed the ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226

I think we should change dash to dot for now.

Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?

D.

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush and
> produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
>
> There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
> versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion and
> incompatibilities.
>
> Cos
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> > Cos,
> >
> > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no chances
> > for one more delay.
> > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 & 1.x.0.final
> as
> > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
> other
> > case.
> >
> > Raul & Sergi,
> >
> > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> [hidden email]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Yakov,
> > >
> > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> > > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3>
> was
> > > correct.
> > > 1.5.0-b1
> > > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3>
> -
> > > now correct too, was fixed.
> > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> > >> correct?
> > >>
> > >> Yakov
> > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> > >> >
> > >> > Cos
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> [hidden email]>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
> build
> > >> > ignite
> > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
> included
> > >> > OSGi.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually
> built
> > >> > the
> > >> > > release from?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big
> Data
> > >> and
> > >> > > Messaging Engineer
> > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Anton Vinogradov
Dmitriy,

that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break something
else.
I'll check it today.

Raul,

Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> I filed the ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
>
> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
>
> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
>
> D.
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush
> and
> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
> >
> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion and
> > incompatibilities.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> > > Cos,
> > >
> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
> chances
> > > for one more delay.
> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
> 1.x.0.final
> > as
> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
> > other
> > > case.
> > >
> > > Raul & Sergi,
> > >
> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> > [hidden email]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yakov,
> > > >
> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> > > > <
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >
> > was
> > > > correct.
> > > > 1.5.0-b1
> > > > <
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >
> > -
> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> > > >> correct?
> > > >>
> > > >> Yakov
> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Cos
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> > [hidden email]>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
> > build
> > > >> > ignite
> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
> > included
> > > >> > OSGi.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually
> > built
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > release from?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big
> > Data
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Anton Vinogradov
Seems everything is ok,

https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-b1
https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-final

I'll update versions.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Anton Vinogradov <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> Dmitriy,
>
> that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break something
> else.
> I'll check it today.
>
> Raul,
>
> Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]
> > wrote:
>
>> I filed the ticket:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
>>
>> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
>>
>> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush
>> and
>> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
>> >
>> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
>> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion
>> and
>> > incompatibilities.
>> >
>> > Cos
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
>> > > Cos,
>> > >
>> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
>> chances
>> > > for one more delay.
>> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
>> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
>> 1.x.0.final
>> > as
>> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
>> > other
>> > > case.
>> > >
>> > > Raul & Sergi,
>> > >
>> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good
>> case?
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
>> > [hidden email]
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Yakov,
>> > > >
>> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
>> > > > <
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>> >
>> > was
>> > > > correct.
>> > > > 1.5.0-b1
>> > > > <
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>> >
>> > -
>> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
>> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is
>> that
>> > > >> correct?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Yakov
>> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Cos
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
>> > [hidden email]>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
>> > build
>> > > >> > ignite
>> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
>> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
>> > included
>> > > >> > OSGi.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you
>> actually
>> > built
>> > > >> > the
>> > > >> > > release from?
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Thanks,
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
>> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration,
>> Big
>> > Data
>> > > >> and
>> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
>> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Anton Vinogradov
Versions updated.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Anton Vinogradov <[hidden email]
> wrote:

> Seems everything is ok,
>
> https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-b1
> https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-final
>
> I'll update versions.
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Dmitriy,
>>
>> that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break something
>> else.
>> I'll check it today.
>>
>> Raul,
>>
>> Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I filed the ticket:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
>>>
>>> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
>>>
>>> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush
>>> and
>>> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
>>> >
>>> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in
>>> the
>>> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion
>>> and
>>> > incompatibilities.
>>> >
>>> > Cos
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
>>> > > Cos,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
>>> chances
>>> > > for one more delay.
>>> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
>>> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
>>> 1.x.0.final
>>> > as
>>> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
>>> > other
>>> > > case.
>>> > >
>>> > > Raul & Sergi,
>>> > >
>>> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good
>>> case?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
>>> > [hidden email]
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Yakov,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
>>> > > > <
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>>> >
>>> > was
>>> > > > correct.
>>> > > > 1.5.0-b1
>>> > > > <
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>>> >
>>> > -
>>> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
>>> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
>>> [hidden email]>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is
>>> that
>>> > > >> correct?
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Yakov
>>> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > Cos
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>>> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> > > >> > wrote:
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
>>> > build
>>> > > >> > ignite
>>> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
>>> > > >> > > >
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
>>> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
>>> > included
>>> > > >> > OSGi.
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you
>>> actually
>>> > built
>>> > > >> > the
>>> > > >> > > release from?
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > Thanks,
>>> > > >> > >
>>> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
>>> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration,
>>> Big
>>> > Data
>>> > > >> and
>>> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
>>> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

dsetrakyan
Anton,

Can you please close this ticket if you are done with it?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226

D.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Anton Vinogradov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Versions updated.
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> [hidden email]
> > wrote:
>
> > Seems everything is ok,
> >
> > https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-b1
> > https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-final
> >
> > I'll update versions.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Dmitriy,
> >>
> >> that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break
> something
> >> else.
> >> I'll check it today.
> >>
> >> Raul,
> >>
> >> Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I filed the ticket:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
> >>>
> >>> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
> >>>
> >>> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
> >>>
> >>> D.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to
> rush
> >>> and
> >>> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
> >>> >
> >>> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in
> >>> the
> >>> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion
> >>> and
> >>> > incompatibilities.
> >>> >
> >>> > Cos
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> >>> > > Cos,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
> >>> chances
> >>> > > for one more delay.
> >>> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> >>> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
> >>> 1.x.0.final
> >>> > as
> >>> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with
> some
> >>> > other
> >>> > > case.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Raul & Sergi,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good
> >>> case?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> >>> > [hidden email]
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Yakov,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> >>> > > > <
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >>> >
> >>> > was
> >>> > > > correct.
> >>> > > > 1.5.0-b1
> >>> > > > <
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >>> >
> >>> > -
> >>> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
> >>> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> >>> [hidden email]>
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is
> >>> that
> >>> > > >> correct?
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> Yakov
> >>> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > Cos
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> >>> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> >>> > [hidden email]>
> >>> > > >> > wrote:
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You
> can
> >>> > build
> >>> > > >> > ignite
> >>> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >>> > > >> > > >
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> >>> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
> >>> > included
> >>> > > >> > OSGi.
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you
> >>> actually
> >>> > built
> >>> > > >> > the
> >>> > > >> > > release from?
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> >>> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration,
> >>> Big
> >>> > Data
> >>> > > >> and
> >>> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
> >>> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> >>> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> >>> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 1.5 GA

Konstantin Boudnik-2
In reply to this post by Anton Vinogradov
Great, thanks!

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 07:52PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:

> Versions updated.
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Anton Vinogradov <[hidden email]
> > wrote:
>
> > Seems everything is ok,
> >
> > https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-b1
> > https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final&b=1.5.0-final
> >
> > I'll update versions.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Dmitriy,
> >>
> >> that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break something
> >> else.
> >> I'll check it today.
> >>
> >> Raul,
> >>
> >> Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I filed the ticket:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
> >>>
> >>> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
> >>>
> >>> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
> >>>
> >>> D.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush
> >>> and
> >>> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
> >>> >
> >>> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in
> >>> the
> >>> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion
> >>> and
> >>> > incompatibilities.
> >>> >
> >>> > Cos
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> >>> > > Cos,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
> >>> chances
> >>> > > for one more delay.
> >>> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> >>> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
> >>> 1.x.0.final
> >>> > as
> >>> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
> >>> > other
> >>> > > case.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Raul & Sergi,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good
> >>> case?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> >>> > [hidden email]
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Yakov,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> >>> > > > <
> >>> >
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >>> >
> >>> > was
> >>> > > > correct.
> >>> > > > 1.5.0-b1
> >>> > > > <
> >>> >
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >>> >
> >>> > -
> >>> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
> >>> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> >>> [hidden email]>
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is
> >>> that
> >>> > > >> correct?
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> Yakov
> >>> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > Cos
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> >>> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> >>> > [hidden email]>
> >>> > > >> > wrote:
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
> >>> > build
> >>> > > >> > ignite
> >>> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >>> > > >> > > >
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> >>> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
> >>> > included
> >>> > > >> > OSGi.
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you
> >>> actually
> >>> > built
> >>> > > >> > the
> >>> > > >> > > release from?
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> >>> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration,
> >>> Big
> >>> > Data
> >>> > > >> and
> >>> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
> >>> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> >>> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> >>> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >

signature.asc (237 bytes) Download Attachment