Igniters,
I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does it mean that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html If not, we should definitely add such integration. D. |
No, these are different Spring projects.
Actually it looks like Boot is just a tool for faster bootstrap of Spring-enabled projects (I looked through the docs really briefly, so can miss something). Dmitry, what kind of integration do you have in mind? -Val On Wednesday, November 4, 2015, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> wrote: > Igniters, > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does it mean > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > D. > |
In reply to this post by dsetrakyan
Hi,
@Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of spring-context module. If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project he should configure cache manager in application context. Cache manager should implement org.springframework.cache.CacheManager interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite based caching to Spring users. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> wrote: > Igniters, > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does it mean > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > D. > -- Andrey Gura GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com |
Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class.
-Val On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of spring-context > module. > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project he should > configure cache manager in application context. > > Cache manager should implement org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite based caching > to Spring users. > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email] > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does it > mean > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > D. > > > > > > -- > Andrey Gura > GridGain Systems, Inc. > www.gridgain.com > |
Oops, I didn't noticed.
Ok, it means we already have this integration. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < [hidden email]> wrote: > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > -Val > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of spring-context > > module. > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project he > should > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > Cache manager should implement org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite based > caching > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email] > > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does it > > mean > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrey Gura > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > www.gridgain.com > > > -- Andrey Gura GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com |
How about @CachePut, @Caching, @CacheConfig, and @CacheEvict annotations
listed here: http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.2.0.RC1/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#cache-annotations-put We support all these? D. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > Oops, I didn't noticed. > > Ok, it means we already have this integration. > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > > > -Val > > > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of spring-context > > > module. > > > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project he > > should > > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > > > Cache manager should implement org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite based > > caching > > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > [hidden email] > > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does it > > > mean > > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrey Gura > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrey Gura > GridGain Systems, Inc. > www.gridgain.com > |
We should not support this annotations. All listed annotation (excluding
@CacheConfig) allows user to manage caching behaviour (eg. eviction on cache update) and doesn't affect CacheManager implementation. @CacheConfig just defines cache configuration that will be used for particular Spring service. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> wrote: > How about @CachePut, @Caching, @CacheConfig, and @CacheEvict annotations > listed here: > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.2.0.RC1/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#cache-annotations-put > > We support all these? > > D. > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Oops, I didn't noticed. > > > > Ok, it means we already have this integration. > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > > > > > -Val > > > > > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of spring-context > > > > module. > > > > > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project he > > > should > > > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > > > > > Cache manager should implement org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite based > > > caching > > > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > [hidden email] > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does > it > > > > mean > > > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrey Gura > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > www.gridgain.com > > > -- Andrey Gura GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com |
See my comments inline.
Also note that we have a documentation page for this feature: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/spring-caching On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > We should not support this annotations. All listed annotation (excluding > @CacheConfig) allows user to manage caching behaviour (eg. eviction on > cache update) and doesn't affect CacheManager implementation. > I think it's better to say that implementing cache manager is enough to support all these annotations as well as any other functionality of Spring Caching. So yes, we do support them. > > @CacheConfig just defines cache configuration that will be used for > particular Spring service. > This is right. This annotation should be processed only by Spring and allows, for example, to use custom cache manager implementation (e.g., Ignite-based). > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > How about @CachePut, @Caching, @CacheConfig, and @CacheEvict annotations > > listed here: > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.2.0.RC1/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#cache-annotations-put > > > > We support all these? > > > > D. > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > Oops, I didn't noticed. > > > > > > Ok, it means we already have this integration. > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > > > > > > > -Val > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of > spring-context > > > > > module. > > > > > > > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project he > > > > should > > > > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > > > > > > > Cache manager should implement > org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > > > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite based > > > > caching > > > > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > [hidden email] > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. > Does > > it > > > > > mean > > > > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrey Gura > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrey Gura > GridGain Systems, Inc. > www.gridgain.com > |
I still think that integration with spring-boot and spring caching is part
of the same project. Ignite should be integrating with spring-boot to deliver caching functionality to spring users. I just want to get another confirmation. We are saying that all the annotations described in Spring caching are supported by Ignite, right? In that case, can we crate an example using all these annotations and add it to the set of Ignite examples shipped with the project? I also think we need to post a question on StackOverflow with spring-boot tag and ask them how to add Ignite configuration to the spring-booth search path for caching providers. I don’t mind doing this, but I would like to show a GitHub link to some example of using Spring Caching with Ignite. D. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < [hidden email]> wrote: > See my comments inline. > > Also note that we have a documentation page for this feature: > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/spring-caching > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > We should not support this annotations. All listed annotation (excluding > > @CacheConfig) allows user to manage caching behaviour (eg. eviction on > > cache update) and doesn't affect CacheManager implementation. > > > > I think it's better to say that implementing cache manager is enough to > support all these annotations as well as any other functionality of Spring > Caching. So yes, we do support them. > > > > > > @CacheConfig just defines cache configuration that will be used for > > particular Spring service. > > > > This is right. This annotation should be processed only by Spring and > allows, for example, to use custom cache manager implementation (e.g., > Ignite-based). > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email] > > > > wrote: > > > > > How about @CachePut, @Caching, @CacheConfig, and @CacheEvict > annotations > > > listed here: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.2.0.RC1/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#cache-annotations-put > > > > > > We support all these? > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Oops, I didn't noticed. > > > > > > > > Ok, it means we already have this integration. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > > > > > > > > > -Val > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of > > spring-context > > > > > > module. > > > > > > > > > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project > he > > > > > should > > > > > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cache manager should implement > > org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > > > > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite > based > > > > > caching > > > > > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. > > Does > > > it > > > > > > mean > > > > > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrey Gura > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > www.gridgain.com > > > |
We can do more. Spring.io allow contribute own guidelines. See
https://github.com/spring-guides/getting-started-guides/wiki On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> wrote: > I still think that integration with spring-boot and spring caching is part > of the same project. Ignite should be integrating with spring-boot to > deliver caching functionality to spring users. > > I just want to get another confirmation. We are saying that all the > annotations described in Spring caching are supported by Ignite, right? In > that case, can we crate an example using all these annotations and add it > to the set of Ignite examples shipped with the project? > > I also think we need to post a question on StackOverflow with spring-boot > tag and ask them how to add Ignite configuration to the spring-booth search > path for caching providers. I don’t mind doing this, but I would like to > show a GitHub link to some example of using Spring Caching with Ignite. > > D. > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > See my comments inline. > > > > Also note that we have a documentation page for this feature: > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/spring-caching > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > We should not support this annotations. All listed annotation > (excluding > > > @CacheConfig) allows user to manage caching behaviour (eg. eviction on > > > cache update) and doesn't affect CacheManager implementation. > > > > > > > I think it's better to say that implementing cache manager is enough to > > support all these annotations as well as any other functionality of > Spring > > Caching. So yes, we do support them. > > > > > > > > > > @CacheConfig just defines cache configuration that will be used for > > > particular Spring service. > > > > > > > This is right. This annotation should be processed only by Spring and > > allows, for example, to use custom cache manager implementation (e.g., > > Ignite-based). > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > [hidden email] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > How about @CachePut, @Caching, @CacheConfig, and @CacheEvict > > annotations > > > > listed here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.2.0.RC1/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#cache-annotations-put > > > > > > > > We support all these? > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Oops, I didn't noticed. > > > > > > > > > > Ok, it means we already have this integration. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > > > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Val > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of > > > spring-context > > > > > > > module. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based > project > > he > > > > > > should > > > > > > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cache manager should implement > > > org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > > > > > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite > > based > > > > > > caching > > > > > > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. > > > Does > > > > it > > > > > > > mean > > > > > > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrey Gura > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > -- Andrey Gura GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com |
Spring Boot is framework for simplify start your development. It contains
auto configurations for many technologies such as JMX,JMS and many others. It would be nice, if you realize Ignite mechanisms and annotations like @EnableIngnite @EnableIgniteFileSystem and others. чт, 5 нояб. 2015 г. в 22:36, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>: > We can do more. Spring.io allow contribute own guidelines. See > https://github.com/spring-guides/getting-started-guides/wiki > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > I still think that integration with spring-boot and spring caching is > part > > of the same project. Ignite should be integrating with spring-boot to > > deliver caching functionality to spring users. > > > > I just want to get another confirmation. We are saying that all the > > annotations described in Spring caching are supported by Ignite, right? > In > > that case, can we crate an example using all these annotations and add it > > to the set of Ignite examples shipped with the project? > > > > I also think we need to post a question on StackOverflow with spring-boot > > tag and ask them how to add Ignite configuration to the spring-booth > search > > path for caching providers. I don’t mind doing this, but I would like to > > show a GitHub link to some example of using Spring Caching with Ignite. > > > > D. > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > See my comments inline. > > > > > > Also note that we have a documentation page for this feature: > > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/spring-caching > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > > > We should not support this annotations. All listed annotation > > (excluding > > > > @CacheConfig) allows user to manage caching behaviour (eg. eviction > on > > > > cache update) and doesn't affect CacheManager implementation. > > > > > > > > > > I think it's better to say that implementing cache manager is enough to > > > support all these annotations as well as any other functionality of > > Spring > > > Caching. So yes, we do support them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @CacheConfig just defines cache configuration that will be used for > > > > particular Spring service. > > > > > > > > > > This is right. This annotation should be processed only by Spring and > > > allows, for example, to use custom cache manager implementation (e.g., > > > Ignite-based). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > How about @CachePut, @Caching, @CacheConfig, and @CacheEvict > > > annotations > > > > > listed here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.2.0.RC1/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#cache-annotations-put > > > > > > > > > > We support all these? > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Oops, I didn't noticed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, it means we already have this integration. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > > > > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Val > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[hidden email] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of > > > > spring-context > > > > > > > > module. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based > > project > > > he > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cache manager should implement > > > > org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > > > > > > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite > > > based > > > > > > > caching > > > > > > > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable > annotation. > > > > Does > > > > > it > > > > > > > > mean > > > > > > > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrey Gura > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrey Gura > GridGain Systems, Inc. > www.gridgain.com > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |