Agree, really strange. Even method close() without Closeable looks
meaningless,
if there is method removed() then it must have paired method remove() but
not close().
Sergi
2015-09-18 17:22 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <
[hidden email]>:
> Igniters,
>
> IgniteAtomicLong extends "Closeable" interface. Why? This appears to be
> wrong, because normally user expects that Closeable/AutoCloseable resources
> are used as follows:
>
> try (Resource r = ...) {
> ...
> }
>
> For IgniteAtomicLong it means creation with immedaite destroy, definitely
> not what user expects. I think we must remove "extend Closeable" from all
> atomic classes and simply leave "close()" method which cannot be used with
> try-with-resources idiom.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Vladimir.
>