Hello Igniters,
It came to our attention that our handling of Web Sessions is inconsistent: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45648884/apache-ignite-spring-secutiry-error I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6070 and fixed the issue in https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2621 (amended tests pass) Please step forward to review and possibly merge this change, as I could not locate any commiters familiar with Web Sessions directly. Thanks, -- Ilya Kasnacheev |
Val, can you please help?
--Yakov 2017-09-12 14:30 GMT+03:00 Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > Hello Igniters, > > It came to our attention that our handling of Web Sessions is inconsistent: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45648884/apache- > ignite-spring-secutiry-error > > I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6070 and fixed the > issue in https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2621 (amended tests pass) > > Please step forward to review and possibly merge this change, as I could > not locate any commiters familiar with Web Sessions directly. > > Thanks, > > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > |
Ilya,
I see you have a fully-pledged application to test the scenario. Is it possible to include it (probably simplified a bit) into our tests suites so that it runs periodically? This will not only verify this particular fix, but also prevent us from other issues that may occur. -Val On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote: > Val, can you please help? > > --Yakov > > 2017-09-12 14:30 GMT+03:00 Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > It came to our attention that our handling of Web Sessions is > inconsistent: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45648884/apache- > > ignite-spring-secutiry-error > > > > I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6070 and fixed > the > > issue in https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2621 (amended tests pass) > > > > Please step forward to review and possibly merge this change, as I could > > not locate any commiters familiar with Web Sessions directly. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > |
Hello Valentin,
The application you are probably referring to is user code from Stack Overflow and its license is uncertain. Moreover, this will require depending our tests on spring-mvc and spring-security. If that is acceptable, I could throw together a clean room implementation. But I still think it tests too little for too much effort. What do you think? Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev 2017-09-13 2:33 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <[hidden email] >: > Ilya, > > I see you have a fully-pledged application to test the scenario. Is it > possible to include it (probably simplified a bit) into our tests suites so > that it runs periodically? This will not only verify this particular fix, > but also prevent us from other issues that may occur. > > -Val > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Val, can you please help? > > > > --Yakov > > > > 2017-09-12 14:30 GMT+03:00 Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > > > It came to our attention that our handling of Web Sessions is > > inconsistent: > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45648884/apache- > > > ignite-spring-secutiry-error > > > > > > I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6070 and fixed > > the > > > issue in https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2621 (amended tests > pass) > > > > > > Please step forward to review and possibly merge this change, as I > could > > > not locate any commiters familiar with Web Sessions directly. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > |
Ilya,
I'm not suggesting to include this code as-is, but rather add tests that for this use case and improve code coverage. Our current test seem to be very artificial and we keep getting issues like this one. I'm open to suggestions here, this can even be done as a separate task if we extend the scope. Adding dependencies in 'test' scope is perfectly acceptable as long as they are good from licensing standpoint (which is the case for any Spring artifacts of course). -Val On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello Valentin, > > The application you are probably referring to is user code from Stack > Overflow and its license is uncertain. > > Moreover, this will require depending our tests on spring-mvc and > spring-security. > > If that is acceptable, I could throw together a clean room implementation. > But I still think it tests too little for too much effort. What do you > think? > > Regards, > > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > 2017-09-13 2:33 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko < > [hidden email] > >: > > > Ilya, > > > > I see you have a fully-pledged application to test the scenario. Is it > > possible to include it (probably simplified a bit) into our tests suites > so > > that it runs periodically? This will not only verify this particular fix, > > but also prevent us from other issues that may occur. > > > > -Val > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > Val, can you please help? > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > 2017-09-12 14:30 GMT+03:00 Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email] > >: > > > > > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > > > > > It came to our attention that our handling of Web Sessions is > > > inconsistent: > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45648884/apache- > > > > ignite-spring-secutiry-error > > > > > > > > I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6070 and > fixed > > > the > > > > issue in https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2621 (amended tests > > pass) > > > > > > > > Please step forward to review and possibly merge this change, as I > > could > > > > not locate any commiters familiar with Web Sessions directly. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |