Den,
Mentioned enum is removed in PR for IGNITE-4587 issue. This PR isn't
merged into master branch yet.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Denis Magda <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Do we need to merge anything else to the master branch or you mean the enum was removed with the rest of the changes before and merged by Andrey G?
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On Mar 30, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Kozlov Maxim <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> + Denis
>>
>>> 30 марта 2017 г., в 12:14, Kozlov Maxim <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Denis,
>>>
>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum already removed.
>>>
>>>> 30 марта 2017 г., в 7:38, Denis Magda <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> написал(а):
>>>>
>>>> Maxim, Andrey G., Igniters,
>>>>
>>>> What if go further and remove CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum from the public API at all? I see no sense to keep it for the only one option left - PRIMARY.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections?
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Kozlov Maxim <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>
>>>>> After remove CLOCK mode, CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum contains now only one value PRIMARY. Andrey Gura, proposition remove CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum. Will there be something special for this purpose is enum?
>>>>>
>>>>> jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587> <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Max K.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Max K.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Max K.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Locked
