Cross posting to dev list for comment on cache interceptor availability on
Ignite .Net client. -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 10:35 PM To: '[hidden email]' <[hidden email]> Subject: RE: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in Ignite.Net Further investigation shows CacheInterceptor is not a part of the Ignite.NET API. Is there a plan/ticket for this to be done? -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 1:08 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in Ignite.Net Val, Are the interceptors invoked in the affinity co-located context of the item? The help is a little unclear on that. Thanks, Raymond. Sent from my iPhone > On 28/04/2018, at 12:12 PM, vkulichenko <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Raymond, > > If you go with approach I described above, I would actually recommend to use > interceptors: > https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/cache/ CacheInterceptor.html > > Continuous query seems to be a bit cumbersome for this. > > -Val > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ |
Hi Raymond,
Was this question answered? Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov вт, 1 мая 2018 г. в 0:20, Raymond Wilson <[hidden email]>: > Cross posting to dev list for comment on cache interceptor availability on > Ignite .Net client. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 10:35 PM > To: '[hidden email]' <[hidden email]> > Subject: RE: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in > Ignite.Net > > Further investigation shows CacheInterceptor is not a part of the > Ignite.NET API. > > Is there a plan/ticket for this to be done? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[hidden email]] > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 1:08 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in > Ignite.Net > > Val, > > Are the interceptors invoked in the affinity co-located context of the > item? The help is a little unclear on that. > > Thanks, > Raymond. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 28/04/2018, at 12:12 PM, vkulichenko <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > Raymond, > > > > If you go with approach I described above, I would actually recommend to > use > > interceptors: > > > https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/cache/ > CacheInterceptor.html > <https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/cache/CacheInterceptor.html> > > > > Continuous query seems to be a bit cumbersome for this. > > > > -Val > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ > |
Hi Dmitriy,
My question regarding cache interceptor availability in .Net is still outstanding. I have working code using a continuous query, but am interested in cache interceptor if this is a better solution. Thanks. Raymond. *From:* Dmitry Pavlov [mailto:[hidden email]] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:45 AM *To:* [hidden email] *Cc:* [hidden email] *Subject:* Re: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in Ignite.Net Hi Raymond, Was this question answered? Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov вт, 1 мая 2018 г. в 0:20, Raymond Wilson <[hidden email]>: Cross posting to dev list for comment on cache interceptor availability on Ignite .Net client. -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 10:35 PM To: '[hidden email]' <[hidden email]> Subject: RE: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in Ignite.Net Further investigation shows CacheInterceptor is not a part of the Ignite.NET API. Is there a plan/ticket for this to be done? -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 1:08 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in Ignite.Net Val, Are the interceptors invoked in the affinity co-located context of the item? The help is a little unclear on that. Thanks, Raymond. Sent from my iPhone > On 28/04/2018, at 12:12 PM, vkulichenko <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Raymond, > > If you go with approach I described above, I would actually recommend to use > interceptors: > https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/cache/ CacheInterceptor.html > > Continuous query seems to be a bit cumbersome for this. > > -Val > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |