Guys,
When running tests from core module I see that Ignite has 2 plugins configured by default (because they are available in classpath): -TestReconnectPlugin 1.0 -StanByClusterTestProvider 1.0 It seems they were introduced by Dmitry Karachentsev and Dmitry Govorukhin. Guys, can you please move the plugins to extdata project similar to PlatformTestPlugin and configure them only when needed. This is not correct that each test we run for Ignite runs with plugins configured. By default Ignite does not have any plugin. --Yakov |
Yakov,
Agree, I created the issue for this. I will try to do it in the near future. IGNITE-7679 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote: > Guys, > > When running tests from core module I see that Ignite has 2 plugins > configured by default (because they are available in classpath): > > -TestReconnectPlugin 1.0 > -StanByClusterTestProvider 1.0 > > It seems they were introduced by Dmitry Karachentsev and Dmitry Govorukhin. > Guys, can you please move the plugins to extdata project similar to > PlatformTestPlugin and configure them only when needed. This is not correct > that each test we run for Ignite runs with plugins configured. By default > Ignite does not have any plugin. > > --Yakov > |
Folks,
I've found another plugin - `PageMemory tracker plugin 1.0`. It contains `IGNITE_ENABLE_PAGE_MEMORY_TRACKER` which is `false` by default, so it doesn't participate in current tests. But I think we should also move it to `extdata` module too. Am I right? Should we update JIRA [1] description regarding newly available plugin? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679 On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 19:57 Dmitriy Govorukhin < [hidden email]> wrote: > Yakov, > > Agree, I created the issue for this. I will try to do it in the near > future. > > IGNITE-7679 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679> > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > When running tests from core module I see that Ignite has 2 plugins > > configured by default (because they are available in classpath): > > > > -TestReconnectPlugin 1.0 > > -StanByClusterTestProvider 1.0 > > > > It seems they were introduced by Dmitry Karachentsev and Dmitry > Govorukhin. > > Guys, can you please move the plugins to extdata project similar to > > PlatformTestPlugin and configure them only when needed. This is not > correct > > that each test we run for Ignite runs with plugins configured. By default > > Ignite does not have any plugin. > > > > --Yakov > > > -- Maxim Muzafarov |
Hello Maxim,
I miss this conversation and ticket when implementing PageMemory tracker plugin. By default, it's disabled (every method do nothing), but plugin instance created anyway. If we want to get clear Ignite instances in the testing framework in the core module, PageMemory tracker plugin also should be moved to another module. чт, 6 сент. 2018 г. в 19:50, Maxim Muzafarov <[hidden email]>: > Folks, > > I've found another plugin - `PageMemory tracker plugin 1.0`. It contains > `IGNITE_ENABLE_PAGE_MEMORY_TRACKER` > which is `false` by default, so it doesn't participate in current tests. > > But I think we should also move it to `extdata` module too. Am I right? > Should we update JIRA [1] description regarding newly available plugin? > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679 > > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 19:57 Dmitriy Govorukhin < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Yakov, > > > > Agree, I created the issue for this. I will try to do it in the near > > future. > > > > IGNITE-7679 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > When running tests from core module I see that Ignite has 2 plugins > > > configured by default (because they are available in classpath): > > > > > > -TestReconnectPlugin 1.0 > > > -StanByClusterTestProvider 1.0 > > > > > > It seems they were introduced by Dmitry Karachentsev and Dmitry > > Govorukhin. > > > Guys, can you please move the plugins to extdata project similar to > > > PlatformTestPlugin and configure them only when needed. This is not > > correct > > > that each test we run for Ignite runs with plugins configured. By > default > > > Ignite does not have any plugin. > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > -- > -- > Maxim Muzafarov > |
Alex,
Thank you. I've added an additional comment in IGNITE-7679 about PageMemory tracker plugin, so we can move all plugins within a single ticket and do not miss anything. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679 On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 09:39 Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello Maxim, > > I miss this conversation and ticket when implementing PageMemory tracker > plugin. By default, it's disabled (every method do nothing), but plugin > instance created anyway. > > If we want to get clear Ignite instances in the testing framework in the > core module, PageMemory tracker plugin also should be moved to another > module. > > чт, 6 сент. 2018 г. в 19:50, Maxim Muzafarov <[hidden email]>: > > > Folks, > > > > I've found another plugin - `PageMemory tracker plugin 1.0`. It contains > > `IGNITE_ENABLE_PAGE_MEMORY_TRACKER` > > which is `false` by default, so it doesn't participate in current tests. > > > > But I think we should also move it to `extdata` module too. Am I right? > > Should we update JIRA [1] description regarding newly available plugin? > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679 > > > > > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 19:57 Dmitriy Govorukhin < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > Yakov, > > > > > > Agree, I created the issue for this. I will try to do it in the near > > > future. > > > > > > IGNITE-7679 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > When running tests from core module I see that Ignite has 2 plugins > > > > configured by default (because they are available in classpath): > > > > > > > > -TestReconnectPlugin 1.0 > > > > -StanByClusterTestProvider 1.0 > > > > > > > > It seems they were introduced by Dmitry Karachentsev and Dmitry > > > Govorukhin. > > > > Guys, can you please move the plugins to extdata project similar to > > > > PlatformTestPlugin and configure them only when needed. This is not > > > correct > > > > that each test we run for Ignite runs with plugins configured. By > > default > > > > Ignite does not have any plugin. > > > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > Maxim Muzafarov > > > -- Maxim Muzafarov |
Igniters,
It seems that our pre-configured list of plugins a bit grow up. The full list of them for now: TestReconnectPlugin 1.0 StanByClusterTestProvider 1.0 PageMemory tracker plugin 1.0 TestDistibutedConfigurationPlugin 1.0 NodeValidationPluginProvider 1.0 I think we should move them to separate modules, as mentioned Yakov in the first message. I've left a new comment in JIRA [1], so hopefully, we do not forget to do so. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679 On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 13:54, Maxim Muzafarov <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Alex, > > Thank you. > > I've added an additional comment in IGNITE-7679 about PageMemory tracker plugin, so we can move > all plugins within a single ticket and do not miss anything. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679 > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 09:39 Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hello Maxim, >> >> I miss this conversation and ticket when implementing PageMemory tracker >> plugin. By default, it's disabled (every method do nothing), but plugin >> instance created anyway. >> >> If we want to get clear Ignite instances in the testing framework in the >> core module, PageMemory tracker plugin also should be moved to another >> module. >> >> чт, 6 сент. 2018 г. в 19:50, Maxim Muzafarov <[hidden email]>: >> >> > Folks, >> > >> > I've found another plugin - `PageMemory tracker plugin 1.0`. It contains >> > `IGNITE_ENABLE_PAGE_MEMORY_TRACKER` >> > which is `false` by default, so it doesn't participate in current tests. >> > >> > But I think we should also move it to `extdata` module too. Am I right? >> > Should we update JIRA [1] description regarding newly available plugin? >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679 >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 19:57 Dmitriy Govorukhin < >> > [hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> > > Yakov, >> > > >> > > Agree, I created the issue for this. I will try to do it in the near >> > > future. >> > > >> > > IGNITE-7679 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7679> >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Guys, >> > > > >> > > > When running tests from core module I see that Ignite has 2 plugins >> > > > configured by default (because they are available in classpath): >> > > > >> > > > -TestReconnectPlugin 1.0 >> > > > -StanByClusterTestProvider 1.0 >> > > > >> > > > It seems they were introduced by Dmitry Karachentsev and Dmitry >> > > Govorukhin. >> > > > Guys, can you please move the plugins to extdata project similar to >> > > > PlatformTestPlugin and configure them only when needed. This is not >> > > correct >> > > > that each test we run for Ignite runs with plugins configured. By >> > default >> > > > Ignite does not have any plugin. >> > > > >> > > > --Yakov >> > > > >> > > >> > -- >> > -- >> > Maxim Muzafarov >> > > > -- > -- > Maxim Muzafarov |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |