NearCacheConfiguration extends MutableConfiguration

[Valentin Kulichenko]

Folks,

I just noticed that NearCacheConfiguration class extends JCache's
MutableConfiguration. This means that it inherits properties like
writeThrough, readThrough, etc., which doesn't look right to me.

Was it done on purpose? Does anyone know the reason?

-Val

[yzhdanov]

These properties do not make sense for near cache. I doubt if this has been
done on purpose.
What if we extend Configuration? Will it break anything?

--Yakov

2015-12-08 6:06 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <[hidden email]
>:

> Folks,
>
> I just noticed that NearCacheConfiguration class extends JCache's
> MutableConfiguration. This means that it inherits properties like
> writeThrough, readThrough, etc., which doesn't look right to me.
>
> Was it done on purpose? Does anyone know the reason?
>
> -Val
>

[dsetrakyan]

Are there any other properties from MutableConfiguration that
NearCacheConfiguration requires?

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> These properties do not make sense for near cache. I doubt if this has been
> done on purpose.
> What if we extend Configuration? Will it break anything?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-12-08 6:06 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <
> [hidden email]
> >:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I just noticed that NearCacheConfiguration class extends JCache's
> > MutableConfiguration. This means that it inherits properties like
> > writeThrough, readThrough, etc., which doesn't look right to me.
> >
> > Was it done on purpose? Does anyone know the reason?
> >
> > -Val
> >
>