Hi Team,
I work on implementing Naive Bayes classifiers. Withing IGNITE-9282 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9282> I implemented a Gaussian Bayes and created a PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4869 But there are already a lot of changes That's' why I'd like to create separate tasks for multinomial and Bernoulli Bayes classifiers and continue work. Any objections? Best regards, Ravil |
Hi Ravil,
I think this is a good idea. I prefer to have several small single-feature tickets instead of a big one with several features. I will start reviewing 9282 on this week. Also, I looking forward to seeing those new tickets. Regards, Yuriy вс, 30 сент. 2018 г. в 3:58, Ravil Galeyev <[hidden email]>: > Hi Team, > I work on implementing Naive Bayes classifiers. > > Withing IGNITE-9282 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9282> I > implemented a Gaussian Bayes and created a PR > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4869 > > But there are already a lot of changes > That's' why I'd like to create separate tasks for > multinomial and Bernoulli Bayes classifiers and continue work. > > Any objections? > > Best regards, > Ravil > |
Hi Yuriy,
I created new tickets for other Bayes classifiers IGNITE-9745 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9745> Multinomial Naive Bayes IGNITE-9746 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9746> Complement Naive Bayes IGNITE-9747 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9747> Bernoulli Naive Bayes they are isolated and independent. That's why anybody can work on them. Regards, Ravil On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 19:53 Yuriy Babak <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Ravil, > > I think this is a good idea. I prefer to have several small single-feature > tickets instead of a big one with several features. > > I will start reviewing 9282 on this week. Also, I looking forward to seeing > those new tickets. > > Regards, > Yuriy > > вс, 30 сент. 2018 г. в 3:58, Ravil Galeyev <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi Team, > > I work on implementing Naive Bayes classifiers. > > > > Withing IGNITE-9282 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9282> > I > > implemented a Gaussian Bayes and created a PR > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4869 > > > > But there are already a lot of changes > > That's' why I'd like to create separate tasks for > > multinomial and Bernoulli Bayes classifiers and continue work. > > > > Any objections? > > > > Best regards, > > Ravil > > > |
Great, I support this idea, will help with review too
-- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ |
Hi Team
so, can somebody look at PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4869 with naive Bayes? @zaleslaw, @ybabak do you have time? if reviewing takes time, can I take some other task? I.e. I can implement IGNITE-9284 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9284> Standart scaler for a while. Because I've already implemented one preprocessor and know what to do. On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 09:44 Alexey Zinoviev <[hidden email]> wrote: > Great, I support this idea, will help with review too > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ > |
Dear Ravil, will help with review next week, currently a lot of work with
release documentation review/writing. Of course, you could assign Standart Scaler task for yourself. пт, 5 окт. 2018 г. в 16:38, Ravil Galeyev <[hidden email]>: > Hi Team > > so, can somebody look at PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4869 > with > naive Bayes? > > @zaleslaw, @ybabak do you have time? > if reviewing takes time, can I take some other task? > I.e. I can implement IGNITE-9284 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9284> Standart scaler for a > while. > Because I've already implemented one preprocessor and know what to do. > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 09:44 Alexey Zinoviev <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > Great, I support this idea, will help with review too > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |