Ignite vs Hazelcast

[chandresh pancholi]

https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/

--
Chandresh Pancholi
Senior Software Engineer
Flipkart.com
Email-id:[hidden email]
Contact:08951803660

[Konstantin Boudnik-2]

It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of the in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should be. Thanks for sharing!

But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the link.

Cheers,
  Cos

On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/

[Kostya Kulagin]

Was this in or off heap test?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]> wrote:

> It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing
> themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of the
> in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should be.
> Thanks for sharing!
>
> But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this
> around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the link.
>
> Cheers,
>   Cos
>
> On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/
>

[Konstantin Boudnik-2]

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:36PM, Kostya Kulagin wrote:
> Was this in or off heap test?

That's exactly why I asked the OP to share his thoughts - otherwise, it is
just a slightly amusing reading at best ;)

> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing
> > themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of the
> > in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should be.
> > Thanks for sharing!
> >
> > But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this
> > around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the link.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   Cos
> >
> > On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi <
> > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/
> >

[chandresh pancholi]

My team uses Hazelcast for in memory data grid. i am also wanted to do
comparison with ignite and publish result sometime in next month.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:36PM, Kostya Kulagin wrote:
> > Was this in or off heap test?
>
> That's exactly why I asked the OP to share his thoughts - otherwise, it is
> just a slightly amusing reading at best ;)
>
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing
> > > themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of
> the
> > > in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should
> be.
> > > Thanks for sharing!
> > >
> > > But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this
> > > around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the
> link.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >   Cos
> > >
> > > On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi <
> > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/
> > >
>

--
Chandresh Pancholi
Senior Software Engineer
Flipkart.com
Email-id:[hidden email]
Contact:08951803660

[dsetrakyan]

Thanks, Chandresh, for pointing this out. We also have benchmark results,
which look very different:

https://ignite.apache.org/benchmarks/ignite-vs-hazelcast.html

The main issue here, is that the shown results are for HZ 3.6, which has
not been released yet. I suspect that they have done some performance
improvements there, but we have not been standing still either :)

I think we should re-run HZ 3.6 benchmarks against Ignite 1.5 and see what
happens. We can probably do it in a week or so, when we will be closer with
1.5.

D.

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:20 PM, chandresh pancholi <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> My team uses Hazelcast for in memory data grid. i am also wanted to do
> comparison with ignite and publish result sometime in next month.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:36PM, Kostya Kulagin wrote:
> > > Was this in or off heap test?
> >
> > That's exactly why I asked the OP to share his thoughts - otherwise, it
> is
> > just a slightly amusing reading at best ;)
> >
> > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and
> comparing
> > > > themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child
> of
> > the
> > > > in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should
> > be.
> > > > Thanks for sharing!
> > > >
> > > > But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this
> > > > around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the
> > link.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >   Cos
> > > >
> > > > On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi <
> > > > [hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/
> > > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chandresh Pancholi
> Senior Software Engineer
> Flipkart.com
> Email-id:[hidden email]
> Contact:08951803660
>