Hello everybody!
Denis, I prepared a pull-request and test executed successfully on TeamCity with awaiting time 500 milliseconds. Review it please - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1615 Vadim Opolski 2017-03-10 23:04 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email]>: > Vadim, > > Please prepare a pull-request and make sure that the test passes on > TeamCity. > > — > Denis > > > On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone! > > > > Denis, I've successfully executed GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest > in IDE 10 times on VMware Workstation (3 GB RAM, Intel Core i5-2520M) in > single core mode with 300 MILLISECONDS timeout. > > > > What's the next step ? > > > > Vadim > > > > > > 2017-03-07 22:25 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto: > [hidden email]>>: > > Vadim, > > > > The timeout should be such that the test completes successfully on > single core machine as well as on multi-core servers. Setting timeout to 3 > - 5 seconds should work. > > > > — > > Denis > > > >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > >> > >> Denis, > >> > >> I'm planning to adjust processing time of incoming and outgoing > messages by JMH benchmarks. > >> > >> What do you think are the parameters of commodity hardware/? RAM size? > CPU speed ? or others ? > >> > >> Vadim > >> > >> 2017-03-06 22:36 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto: > [hidden email]>>: > >> Vadim, > >> > >> How do you plan to adjust processing time of incoming and outgoing > messages? In general, I don’t think that you need to move the direction of > the communication layer. > >> > >> I’m thinking that you just need to set some reasonable awaiting time so > that the test passes on a commodity hardware. > >> > >> — > >> Denis > >> > >>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi everyone! > >>> > >>> I executed test GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest.testFailFast > fails periodically with different values of node quantity and awaiting > time. Test fails if the awaiting time is less than 600 miliseconds. > >>> I debugged test and understood that messaging took a lot of time in > this case. > >>> I want to measure (with GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest.testFailFast) > and increase speed of receiving and sending message. > >>> > >>> Denis, what do you think about it ? > >>> > >>> Vadim Opolski > >>> > >>> > >>> 2017-02-24 5:55 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto: > [hidden email]>>: > >>> Hi Vadim, > >>> > >>> Yes, this issue might be still relevant. I can’t guide you through > but, basically, you need to reproduce the issue, spot it in the code and > propose a fix. > >>> > >>> BTW, do you have any experience with Hibernate? If so, I would be > amazing if you pick up this ticket reassigning on yourself: > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794> < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794>> > >>> > >>> — > >>> Denis > >>> > >>> > On Feb 23, 2017, at 2:40 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Dear sirs ! > >>> > > >>> > I want to resolve issue IGNITE-933 > >>> > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-933 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-933> > >>> > > >>> > Is it actual ? > >>> > > >>> > In which class and method you want me to make changes ? > >>> > > >>> > Vadim Opolski > > > > > > |
Thanks, Vadim.
Merged the changes. — Denis > On Mar 14, 2017, at 2:04 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hello everybody! > > Denis, I prepared a pull-request and test executed successfully on TeamCity > with awaiting time 500 milliseconds. > > Review it please - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1615 > > Vadim Opolski > > 2017-03-10 23:04 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email]>: > >> Vadim, >> >> Please prepare a pull-request and make sure that the test passes on >> TeamCity. >> >> — >> Denis >> >>> On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello everyone! >>> >>> Denis, I've successfully executed GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest >> in IDE 10 times on VMware Workstation (3 GB RAM, Intel Core i5-2520M) in >> single core mode with 300 MILLISECONDS timeout. >>> >>> What's the next step ? >>> >>> Vadim >>> >>> >>> 2017-03-07 22:25 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto: >> [hidden email]>>: >>> Vadim, >>> >>> The timeout should be such that the test completes successfully on >> single core machine as well as on multi-core servers. Setting timeout to 3 >> - 5 seconds should work. >>> >>> — >>> Denis >>> >>>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Denis, >>>> >>>> I'm planning to adjust processing time of incoming and outgoing >> messages by JMH benchmarks. >>>> >>>> What do you think are the parameters of commodity hardware/? RAM size? >> CPU speed ? or others ? >>>> >>>> Vadim >>>> >>>> 2017-03-06 22:36 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto: >> [hidden email]>>: >>>> Vadim, >>>> >>>> How do you plan to adjust processing time of incoming and outgoing >> messages? In general, I don’t think that you need to move the direction of >> the communication layer. >>>> >>>> I’m thinking that you just need to set some reasonable awaiting time so >> that the test passes on a commodity hardware. >>>> >>>> — >>>> Denis >>>> >>>>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone! >>>>> >>>>> I executed test GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest.testFailFast >> fails periodically with different values of node quantity and awaiting >> time. Test fails if the awaiting time is less than 600 miliseconds. >>>>> I debugged test and understood that messaging took a lot of time in >> this case. >>>>> I want to measure (with GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest.testFailFast) >> and increase speed of receiving and sending message. >>>>> >>>>> Denis, what do you think about it ? >>>>> >>>>> Vadim Opolski >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-02-24 5:55 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[hidden email] <mailto: >> [hidden email]>>: >>>>> Hi Vadim, >>>>> >>>>> Yes, this issue might be still relevant. I can’t guide you through >> but, basically, you need to reproduce the issue, spot it in the code and >> propose a fix. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, do you have any experience with Hibernate? If so, I would be >> amazing if you pick up this ticket reassigning on yourself: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794> < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794>> >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> Denis >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 23, 2017, at 2:40 AM, Вадим Опольский <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear sirs ! >>>>>> >>>>>> I want to resolve issue IGNITE-933 >>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-933 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-933> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it actual ? >>>>>> >>>>>> In which class and method you want me to make changes ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Vadim Opolski >>> >>> >> >> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |