Hi Gianfranco,
I've done a review of ignite-788. Can you please look on my review (see comment at jira and new attached patch file). Let me know what you think. -- Artem -- |
forwarding the email to dev list
2015-06-30 22:35 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Murador <[hidden email]> : > Hi Artiom, I have no difficult for the first point. I can format the patch > again with Eclipse. > For the second point I can change the pattern layout in the log4j2 config > as in log4j, but it remains very difficult to change the name of the log > file at runtime without using a Route Appender. From one point of view, the > implementation is simple, on the other hand there is always a default log > where will be placed the lines when thread context doesn't have a nodeid. > In attachment to the ticket you can fine an example (file patch.zip). > Let me know if it is ok for you and if it needs further explanation. > Regards, Gianfranco > > > On Jun 30, 2015 8:51 PM, "Artiom Shutak" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Gianfranco, >> >> I've done a review of ignite-788. >> >> Can you please look on my review (see comment at jira and new attached >> patch file). Let me know what you think. >> >> -- Artem -- >> > |
Gianfranco,
See my comments at the jira. -- Artem -- On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Gianfranco Murador < [hidden email]> wrote: > forwarding the email to dev list > > 2015-06-30 22:35 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Murador < > [hidden email]>: > >> Hi Artiom, I have no difficult for the first point. I can format the >> patch again with Eclipse. >> For the second point I can change the pattern layout in the log4j2 config >> as in log4j, but it remains very difficult to change the name of the log >> file at runtime without using a Route Appender. From one point of view, the >> implementation is simple, on the other hand there is always a default log >> where will be placed the lines when thread context doesn't have a nodeid. >> In attachment to the ticket you can fine an example (file patch.zip). >> Let me know if it is ok for you and if it needs further explanation. >> Regards, Gianfranco >> >> >> On Jun 30, 2015 8:51 PM, "Artiom Shutak" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gianfranco, >>> >>> I've done a review of ignite-788. >>> >>> Can you please look on my review (see comment at jira and new attached >>> patch file). Let me know what you think. >>> >>> -- Artem -- >>> >> > |
Hi Artiom,
I made the required changes, let me know if it's ok :). Regards, Gianfranco 2015-07-02 13:31 GMT+02:00 Artiom Shutak <[hidden email]>: > Gianfranco, > > See my comments at the jira. > > -- Artem -- > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Gianfranco Murador < > [hidden email]> wrote: > >> forwarding the email to dev list >> >> 2015-06-30 22:35 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Murador < >> [hidden email]>: >> >>> Hi Artiom, I have no difficult for the first point. I can format the >>> patch again with Eclipse. >>> For the second point I can change the pattern layout in the log4j2 >>> config as in log4j, but it remains very difficult to change the name of the >>> log file at runtime without using a Route Appender. From one point of view, >>> the implementation is simple, on the other hand there is always a default >>> log where will be placed the lines when thread context doesn't have a >>> nodeid. In attachment to the ticket you can fine an example (file >>> patch.zip). >>> Let me know if it is ok for you and if it needs further explanation. >>> Regards, Gianfranco >>> >>> >>> On Jun 30, 2015 8:51 PM, "Artiom Shutak" <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Gianfranco, >>>> >>>> I've done a review of ignite-788. >>>> >>>> Can you please look on my review (see comment at jira and new attached >>>> patch file). Let me know what you think. >>>> >>>> -- Artem -- >>>> >>> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |