Igniters,
It was brought to my attention that we always send the filter instance when creating a continuous query. This is not correct if JCache entry listener API is used, because it works with factories and assumes that filter is not even Serializable, but we require it. I think this can be fixed, but my concern is backward compatibility. CacheContinuousQueryHandler is Externalizable which makes it tricky. Does anyone has suggestions? Ticket is created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1186 -Val |
+1
Deprecate current setter and add new method accepting factory as parameter. Old method can wrap the filter in, let's say, SingletonFactory. --Yakov 2015-07-31 22:29 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko < [hidden email]>: > Igniters, > > It was brought to my attention that we always send the filter instance when > creating a continuous query. This is not correct if JCache entry listener > API is used, because it works with factories and assumes that filter is not > even Serializable, but we require it. > > I think this can be fixed, but my concern is backward > compatibility. CacheContinuousQueryHandler is Externalizable which makes it > tricky. Does anyone has suggestions? > > Ticket is created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1186 > > -Val > |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:
> +1 > > Deprecate current setter and add new method accepting factory as parameter. > Old method can wrap the filter in, let's say, SingletonFactory. > To be honest, I believe that we should just deprecate our ContinuousQuery API and add CacheEntryListenerConfiguration API from JCache, which is based on factories. This will also ensure that all the notifications are provided by a listener instead of some initial query, as users have been asking. I have updated the IGNITE-1186 ticket. > > --Yakov > > 2015-07-31 22:29 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko < > [hidden email]>: > > > Igniters, > > > > It was brought to my attention that we always send the filter instance > when > > creating a continuous query. This is not correct if JCache entry listener > > API is used, because it works with factories and assumes that filter is > not > > even Serializable, but we require it. > > > > I think this can be fixed, but my concern is backward > > compatibility. CacheContinuousQueryHandler is Externalizable which makes > it > > tricky. Does anyone has suggestions? > > > > Ticket is created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1186 > > > > -Val > > > |
I agree. We can extend CacheEntryListenerConfiguration to properly support
initial iteration and reuse everything else. -Val On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Deprecate current setter and add new method accepting factory as > parameter. > > Old method can wrap the filter in, let's say, SingletonFactory. > > > > To be honest, I believe that we should just deprecate our ContinuousQuery > API and add CacheEntryListenerConfiguration API from JCache, which is based > on factories. This will also ensure that all the notifications are provided > by a listener instead of some initial query, as users have been asking. > > I have updated the IGNITE-1186 ticket. > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > 2015-07-31 22:29 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko < > > [hidden email]>: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > It was brought to my attention that we always send the filter instance > > when > > > creating a continuous query. This is not correct if JCache entry > listener > > > API is used, because it works with factories and assumes that filter is > > not > > > even Serializable, but we require it. > > > > > > I think this can be fixed, but my concern is backward > > > compatibility. CacheContinuousQueryHandler is Externalizable which > makes > > it > > > tricky. Does anyone has suggestions? > > > > > > Ticket is created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1186 > > > > > > -Val > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |