Discontinue Scalar in Ignite-2.0?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Discontinue Scalar in Ignite-2.0?

Alexey Kuznetsov
There were no commits for TWO years in ignite-scalar module.
Our java API is good, no need for any wrappers (IMHO).

Also we even do not use it by ourselves in Visor CMD.

Thoughts?

--
Alexey Kuznetsov
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Discontinue Scalar in Ignite-2.0?

nivanov
As the original developer/author of Scalar (and I already voiced this
opinion before) - I think we should deprecate Scalar. Ignite APIs can be
used from Scala as-is with minimal, if any, pimping. The custom DSL
introduced by Scalar proved to be not a popular option either.
--
Nikita Ivanov


On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> There were no commits for TWO years in ignite-scalar module.
> Our java API is good, no need for any wrappers (IMHO).
>
> Also we even do not use it by ourselves in Visor CMD.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Alexey Kuznetsov
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Discontinue Scalar in Ignite-2.0?

Sergi
May be drop it in 2.0 then?

Sergi

2017-04-14 19:11 GMT+03:00 Nikita Ivanov <[hidden email]>:

> As the original developer/author of Scalar (and I already voiced this
> opinion before) - I think we should deprecate Scalar. Ignite APIs can be
> used from Scala as-is with minimal, if any, pimping. The custom DSL
> introduced by Scalar proved to be not a popular option either.
> --
> Nikita Ivanov
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > There were no commits for TWO years in ignite-scalar module.
> > Our java API is good, no need for any wrappers (IMHO).
> >
> > Also we even do not use it by ourselves in Visor CMD.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > Alexey Kuznetsov
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Discontinue Scalar in Ignite-2.0?

dmagda
Sergi takes a lead in the chart of “let’s drop it in 2.0” :))

In general, I would support Nikita here suggesting to deprecate the module first. It’s fine to remove some APIs methods in 2.0 but a deletion of the whole module might be not a good decision.


Denis

> On Apr 14, 2017, at 9:18 AM, Sergi Vladykin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> May be drop it in 2.0 then?
>
> Sergi
>
> 2017-04-14 19:11 GMT+03:00 Nikita Ivanov <[hidden email]>:
>
>> As the original developer/author of Scalar (and I already voiced this
>> opinion before) - I think we should deprecate Scalar. Ignite APIs can be
>> used from Scala as-is with minimal, if any, pimping. The custom DSL
>> introduced by Scalar proved to be not a popular option either.
>> --
>> Nikita Ivanov
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There were no commits for TWO years in ignite-scalar module.
>>> Our java API is good, no need for any wrappers (IMHO).
>>>
>>> Also we even do not use it by ourselves in Visor CMD.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexey Kuznetsov
>>>
>>