Igniters,
I have come across IGNITE-1482 [1] which we have fixed in the upcoming 1.4 release. The issue we have fixed had to do with IgniteCache.replace(...) operation not returning a correct value on cluster topology changes. But a comment in the ticket states that data structures, like AtomicLong, AtomicSequence, etc., may suffer from the same problem. If that is the case, have we fixed this issue for the data structures as well? If not, we should probably create a new ticket for it and cross-link these 2 issues in Jira together. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1482 D. |
I did not check those particular tests after both ignite-264 and
ignite-1482 were fixed. There might be something else left to fix, I will check the tests tomorrow and will create an additional ticket with proper description if something comes up. 2015-09-15 21:10 GMT-07:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>: > Igniters, > > I have come across IGNITE-1482 [1] which we have fixed in the upcoming 1.4 > release. The issue we have fixed had to do with IgniteCache.replace(...) > operation not returning a correct value on cluster topology changes. > > But a comment in the ticket states that data structures, like AtomicLong, > AtomicSequence, etc., may suffer from the same problem. If that is the > case, have we fixed this issue for the data structures as well? If not, we > should probably create a new ticket for it and cross-link these 2 issues > in Jira together. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1482 > > D. > |
The ticket already exists [1]
I've merged the latest changes from ignite-1.4 that should contain the latest Alex's fixes and running the tests for now. Will send an update shortly. -- Denis [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-801 On 9/16/2015 8:43 AM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote: > I did not check those particular tests after both ignite-264 and > ignite-1482 were fixed. There might be something else left to fix, I will > check the tests tomorrow and will create an additional ticket with proper > description if something comes up. > > 2015-09-15 21:10 GMT-07:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>: > >> Igniters, >> >> I have come across IGNITE-1482 [1] which we have fixed in the upcoming 1.4 >> release. The issue we have fixed had to do with IgniteCache.replace(...) >> operation not returning a correct value on cluster topology changes. >> >> But a comment in the ticket states that data structures, like AtomicLong, >> AtomicSequence, etc., may suffer from the same problem. If that is the >> case, have we fixed this issue for the data structures as well? If not, we >> should probably create a new ticket for it and cross-link these 2 issues >> in Jira together. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1482 >> >> D. >> |
The tests keep failing. It means that Alex's changes don't correlate
with an issue I'm observing in ignite-801. Put the latest info in [1] -- Denis On 9/16/2015 8:55 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > The ticket already exists [1] > > I've merged the latest changes from ignite-1.4 that should contain the > latest Alex's fixes and running the tests for now. > > Will send an update shortly. > > -- > Denis > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-801 > > On 9/16/2015 8:43 AM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote: >> I did not check those particular tests after both ignite-264 and >> ignite-1482 were fixed. There might be something else left to fix, I >> will >> check the tests tomorrow and will create an additional ticket with >> proper >> description if something comes up. >> >> 2015-09-15 21:10 GMT-07:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>: >> >>> Igniters, >>> >>> I have come across IGNITE-1482 [1] which we have fixed in the >>> upcoming 1.4 >>> release. The issue we have fixed had to do with >>> IgniteCache.replace(...) >>> operation not returning a correct value on cluster topology changes. >>> >>> But a comment in the ticket states that data structures, like >>> AtomicLong, >>> AtomicSequence, etc., may suffer from the same problem. If that is the >>> case, have we fixed this issue for the data structures as well? If >>> not, we >>> should probably create a new ticket for it and cross-link these 2 >>> issues >>> in Jira together. >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1482 >>> >>> D. >>> > |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> The tests keep failing. It means that Alex's changes don't correlate with > an issue I'm observing in ignite-801. > > Put the latest info in [1] > Thanks Denis. Let's tackle this ticket in 1.5 release. > > -- > Denis > > > On 9/16/2015 8:55 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > >> The ticket already exists [1] >> >> I've merged the latest changes from ignite-1.4 that should contain the >> latest Alex's fixes and running the tests for now. >> >> Will send an update shortly. >> >> -- >> Denis >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-801 >> >> On 9/16/2015 8:43 AM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote: >> >>> I did not check those particular tests after both ignite-264 and >>> ignite-1482 were fixed. There might be something else left to fix, I will >>> check the tests tomorrow and will create an additional ticket with proper >>> description if something comes up. >>> >>> 2015-09-15 21:10 GMT-07:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>: >>> >>> Igniters, >>>> >>>> I have come across IGNITE-1482 [1] which we have fixed in the upcoming >>>> 1.4 >>>> release. The issue we have fixed had to do with IgniteCache.replace(...) >>>> operation not returning a correct value on cluster topology changes. >>>> >>>> But a comment in the ticket states that data structures, like >>>> AtomicLong, >>>> AtomicSequence, etc., may suffer from the same problem. If that is the >>>> case, have we fixed this issue for the data structures as well? If not, >>>> we >>>> should probably create a new ticket for it and cross-link these 2 >>>> issues >>>> in Jira together. >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1482 >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |