C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

Prashant Singh Thakur


Hi,



Do we have a C++ client for interacting with Ignite and if yes what all operations are supported ?

We are looking for some alternative to Infinispan as not able to scale to 100G per node hence exploring this as an alternative.

The major use cases at present would be to interact with cache with Queries If that's there we would like to benchmark the same for our use cases.


Best Regards,
Prashant Thakur

Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

yzhdanov
Prashant,

Ignite currently Ignite does not have C++ API - we are currently working on
this and this will be ready within 2 months or so.

If you are on Windows you can use .Net APIs available in Enterprise
edition. Will this work for you?

--Yakov

2015-05-08 9:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <[hidden email]>:

>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Do we have a C++ client for interacting with Ignite and if yes what all
> operations are supported ?
>
> We are looking for some alternative to Infinispan as not able to scale to
> 100G per node hence exploring this as an alternative.
>
> The major use cases at present would be to interact with cache with
> Queries If that's there we would like to benchmark the same for our use
> cases.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Prashant Thakur
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at
> http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

Prashant Singh Thakur
Hi Yakov,

We have Linux based application who would be using this.
2 months will be OK for us let us know if require any help.
We are looking for APIs especially for Query part will that be available of it would be normal Cache APIs like get, put.


Best Regards,
Prashant Thakur

-----Original Message-----
From: Yakov Zhdanov [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 2:13 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

Prashant,

Ignite currently Ignite does not have C++ API - we are currently working on this and this will be ready within 2 months or so.

If you are on Windows you can use .Net APIs available in Enterprise edition. Will this work for you?

--Yakov

2015-05-08 9:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <[hidden email]>:

>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Do we have a C++ client for interacting with Ignite and if yes what
> all operations are supported ?
>
> We are looking for some alternative to Infinispan as not able to scale
> to 100G per node hence exploring this as an alternative.
>
> The major use cases at present would be to interact with cache with
> Queries If that's there we would like to benchmark the same for our
> use cases.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Prashant Thakur
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described
> at http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
>
Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

yzhdanov
Prashant, we are trying to achieve API parity. Of course, some limitations
will take place, but cache operations + queries will be supported.

Vladimir Ozerov, can you please reply to this thread with issue number, so
everyone can get updates on the progress?

--Yakov

2015-05-08 12:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <[hidden email]>
:

> Hi Yakov,
>
> We have Linux based application who would be using this.
> 2 months will be OK for us let us know if require any help.
> We are looking for APIs especially for Query part will that be available
> of it would be normal Cache APIs like get, put.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Prashant Thakur
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yakov Zhdanov [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 2:13 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite
>
> Prashant,
>
> Ignite currently Ignite does not have C++ API - we are currently working
> on this and this will be ready within 2 months or so.
>
> If you are on Windows you can use .Net APIs available in Enterprise
> edition. Will this work for you?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-05-08 9:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <[hidden email]
> >:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > Do we have a C++ client for interacting with Ignite and if yes what
> > all operations are supported ?
> >
> > We are looking for some alternative to Infinispan as not able to scale
> > to 100G per node hence exploring this as an alternative.
> >
> > The major use cases at present would be to interact with cache with
> > Queries If that's there we would like to benchmark the same for our
> > use cases.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Prashant Thakur
> >
> > Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described
> > at http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
> >
> Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at
> http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

Vladimir Ozerov
Prashant,

Yes, queries support is on the implementation roadmap. However, there is a
chance that implementation of advanced features (like filters in SCAN
queries, and continuous queries) will be postponed a bit.

Vladimir.

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Prashant, we are trying to achieve API parity. Of course, some limitations
> will take place, but cache operations + queries will be supported.
>
> Vladimir Ozerov, can you please reply to this thread with issue number, so
> everyone can get updates on the progress?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-05-08 12:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <
> [hidden email]>
> :
>
> > Hi Yakov,
> >
> > We have Linux based application who would be using this.
> > 2 months will be OK for us let us know if require any help.
> > We are looking for APIs especially for Query part will that be available
> > of it would be normal Cache APIs like get, put.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Prashant Thakur
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yakov Zhdanov [mailto:[hidden email]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 2:13 PM
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite
> >
> > Prashant,
> >
> > Ignite currently Ignite does not have C++ API - we are currently working
> > on this and this will be ready within 2 months or so.
> >
> > If you are on Windows you can use .Net APIs available in Enterprise
> > edition. Will this work for you?
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2015-05-08 9:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <
> [hidden email]
> > >:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Do we have a C++ client for interacting with Ignite and if yes what
> > > all operations are supported ?
> > >
> > > We are looking for some alternative to Infinispan as not able to scale
> > > to 100G per node hence exploring this as an alternative.
> > >
> > > The major use cases at present would be to interact with cache with
> > > Queries If that's there we would like to benchmark the same for our
> > > use cases.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Prashant Thakur
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described
> > > at http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
> > >
> > Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at
> > http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite

Konstantin Boudnik-2
And, as always, if you feel like and have cycles to do this - please consider
contributing to this implementation. As a user your involvement would be hard
to underestimate.

Cos

On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:17PM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote:

> Prashant,
>
> Yes, queries support is on the implementation roadmap. However, there is a
> chance that implementation of advanced features (like filters in SCAN
> queries, and continuous queries) will be postponed a bit.
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Prashant, we are trying to achieve API parity. Of course, some limitations
> > will take place, but cache operations + queries will be supported.
> >
> > Vladimir Ozerov, can you please reply to this thread with issue number, so
> > everyone can get updates on the progress?
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2015-05-08 12:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <
> > [hidden email]>
> > :
> >
> > > Hi Yakov,
> > >
> > > We have Linux based application who would be using this.
> > > 2 months will be OK for us let us know if require any help.
> > > We are looking for APIs especially for Query part will that be available
> > > of it would be normal Cache APIs like get, put.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Prashant Thakur
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Yakov Zhdanov [mailto:[hidden email]]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 2:13 PM
> > > To: [hidden email]
> > > Subject: Re: C++ clients for Interacting with Ignite
> > >
> > > Prashant,
> > >
> > > Ignite currently Ignite does not have C++ API - we are currently working
> > > on this and this will be ready within 2 months or so.
> > >
> > > If you are on Windows you can use .Net APIs available in Enterprise
> > > edition. Will this work for you?
> > >
> > > --Yakov
> > >
> > > 2015-05-08 9:01 GMT+03:00 Prashant Singh Thakur <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we have a C++ client for interacting with Ignite and if yes what
> > > > all operations are supported ?
> > > >
> > > > We are looking for some alternative to Infinispan as not able to scale
> > > > to 100G per node hence exploring this as an alternative.
> > > >
> > > > The major use cases at present would be to interact with cache with
> > > > Queries If that's there we would like to benchmark the same for our
> > > > use cases.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Prashant Thakur
> > > >
> > > > Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described
> > > > at http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
> > > >
> > > Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at
> > > http://www.subex.com/mail-disclaimer.html
> > >
> >