Hi, Igniters!
I was discovering how indexes work and found a failed test. BasicIndexTest#testInlineSizeChange is broken in master and it's not a flaky case [1]. But it has been failing since 25/09 only. I discovered that it happened after the IGNITE-13207 ticket merged (Checkpointer code refactoring) [2]. I'm not sure about the expected behaviour of the inline index and how checkpointer affects it. But let's fix it if it is a bug or completely remove this test. [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=6131871779633595667&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13207 |
Thanks Maxim, the test is correct no need for removal. I checked 2.9 too, but looks it all ok there. I will take a look. >Hi, Igniters! > >I was discovering how indexes work and found a failed test. >BasicIndexTest#testInlineSizeChange is broken in master and it's not a >flaky case [1]. But it has been failing since 25/09 only. > >I discovered that it happened after the IGNITE-13207 ticket merged >(Checkpointer code refactoring) [2]. I'm not sure about the expected >behaviour of the inline index and how checkpointer affects it. But let's >fix it if it is a bug or completely remove this test. > >[1] >https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=6131871779633595667&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails > >[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13207 > |
Max,
Thanks for spotting this, great catch! Zhenya, could you please file a ticket of at least Critical priority? On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 9:24 AM Zhenya Stanilovsky <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Thanks Maxim, the test is correct no need for removal. > I checked 2.9 too, but looks it all ok there. I will take a look. > >Hi, Igniters! > > > >I was discovering how indexes work and found a failed test. > >BasicIndexTest#testInlineSizeChange is broken in master and it's not a > >flaky case [1]. But it has been failing since 25/09 only. > > > >I discovered that it happened after the IGNITE-13207 ticket merged > >(Checkpointer code refactoring) [2]. I'm not sure about the expected > >behaviour of the inline index and how checkpointer affects it. But let's > >fix it if it is a bug or completely remove this test. > > > >[1] > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=6131871779633595667&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails > > > >[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13207 > > > |
Hi everyone,
I believe I have a fix for this bug - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13500, So Zhenya you can leave this problem to me. -- Best regards, Anton Kalashnikov 09.10.2020, 10:19, "Sergey Chugunov" <[hidden email]>: > Max, > > Thanks for spotting this, great catch! > > Zhenya, could you please file a ticket of at least Critical priority? > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 9:24 AM Zhenya Stanilovsky > <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Thanks Maxim, the test is correct no need for removal. >> I checked 2.9 too, but looks it all ok there. I will take a look. >> >Hi, Igniters! >> > >> >I was discovering how indexes work and found a failed test. >> >BasicIndexTest#testInlineSizeChange is broken in master and it's not a >> >flaky case [1]. But it has been failing since 25/09 only. >> > >> >I discovered that it happened after the IGNITE-13207 ticket merged >> >(Checkpointer code refactoring) [2]. I'm not sure about the expected >> >behaviour of the inline index and how checkpointer affects it. But let's >> >fix it if it is a bug or completely remove this test. >> > >> >[1] >> > >> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=6131871779633595667&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails >> > >> >[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13207 >> > |
Of course, i still have no ticket filled. As was discussed in private i will fill other ticket that can lead to potential problems. >Hi everyone, > >I believe I have a fix for this bug - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13500, So Zhenya you can leave this problem to me. > >-- >Best regards, >Anton Kalashnikov > > > >09.10.2020, 10:19, "Sergey Chugunov" < [hidden email] >: >> Max, >> >> Thanks for spotting this, great catch! >> >> Zhenya, could you please file a ticket of at least Critical priority? >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 9:24 AM Zhenya Stanilovsky >> < [hidden email] > wrote: >> >>> Thanks Maxim, the test is correct no need for removal. >>> I checked 2.9 too, but looks it all ok there. I will take a look. >>> >Hi, Igniters! >>> > >>> >I was discovering how indexes work and found a failed test. >>> >BasicIndexTest#testInlineSizeChange is broken in master and it's not a >>> >flaky case [1]. But it has been failing since 25/09 only. >>> > >>> >I discovered that it happened after the IGNITE-13207 ticket merged >>> >(Checkpointer code refactoring) [2]. I'm not sure about the expected >>> >behaviour of the inline index and how checkpointer affects it. But let's >>> >fix it if it is a bug or completely remove this test. >>> > >>> >[1] >>> > >>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=6131871779633595667&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails >>> > >>> >[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13207 >>> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |