Asyncronous operations on distributed structures

[Vladimir Ozerov]

Igniters,

In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All previously
described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no async
operations in it's implemenation.

Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them?

Vladimir.

[Andrey Gura]

There is the same comment for the following interfaces:

- IgniteAtomicReference
- IgniteAtomicSequence
- IgniteAtomicStamped

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Igniters,
>
> In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All previously
> described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no async
> operations in it's implemenation.
>
> Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them?
>
> Vladimir.
>

--
Andrey Gura
GridGain Systems, Inc.
www.gridgain.com

[dsetrakyan]

In this case, should we just simply update the documentation to reflect the
reality?

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote:

> There is the same comment for the following interfaces:
>
> - IgniteAtomicReference
> - IgniteAtomicSequence
> - IgniteAtomicStamped
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All previously
> > described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no async
> > operations in it's implemenation.
> >
> > Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them?
> >
> > Vladimir.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andrey Gura
> GridGain Systems, Inc.
> www.gridgain.com
>

[yzhdanov]

Absolutely agree ;)

Andrey, can you please do?

--Yakov

2015-09-17 17:17 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>:

> In this case, should we just simply update the documentation to reflect the
> reality?
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > There is the same comment for the following interfaces:
> >
> > - IgniteAtomicReference
> > - IgniteAtomicSequence
> > - IgniteAtomicStamped
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All previously
> > > described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no async
> > > operations in it's implemenation.
> > >
> > > Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them?
> > >
> > > Vladimir.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrey Gura
> > GridGain Systems, Inc.
> > www.gridgain.com
> >
>

[Andrey Gura]

Done

https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/100

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Absolutely agree ;)
>
> Andrey, can you please do?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-09-17 17:17 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>:
>
> > In this case, should we just simply update the documentation to reflect
> the
> > reality?
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > There is the same comment for the following interfaces:
> > >
> > > - IgniteAtomicReference
> > > - IgniteAtomicSequence
> > > - IgniteAtomicStamped
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[hidden email]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Igniters,
> > > >
> > > > In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All previously
> > > > described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no async
> > > > operations in it's implemenation.
> > > >
> > > > Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them?
> > > >
> > > > Vladimir.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrey Gura
> > > GridGain Systems, Inc.
> > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> >
>

--
Andrey Gura
GridGain Systems, Inc.
www.gridgain.com

[yzhdanov]

I reviewed the changes and I agree. Anton V. can you please merge this PR?

--Yakov

2015-09-18 15:26 GMT+03:00 Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>:

> Done
>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/100
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Absolutely agree ;)
> >
> > Andrey, can you please do?
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2015-09-17 17:17 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>:
> >
> > > In this case, should we just simply update the documentation to reflect
> > the
> > > reality?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There is the same comment for the following interfaces:
> > > >
> > > > - IgniteAtomicReference
> > > > - IgniteAtomicSequence
> > > > - IgniteAtomicStamped
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Igniters,
> > > > >
> > > > > In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All
> previously
> > > > > described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no
> async
> > > > > operations in it's implemenation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them?
> > > > >
> > > > > Vladimir.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrey Gura
> > > > GridGain Systems, Inc.
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andrey Gura
> GridGain Systems, Inc.
> www.gridgain.com
>

[Anton Vinogradov]

Done

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I reviewed the changes and I agree. Anton V. can you please merge this PR?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-09-18 15:26 GMT+03:00 Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>:
>
> > Done
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/100
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Absolutely agree ;)
> > >
> > > Andrey, can you please do?
> > >
> > > --Yakov
> > >
> > > 2015-09-17 17:17 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <[hidden email]>:
> > >
> > > > In this case, should we just simply update the documentation to
> reflect
> > > the
> > > > reality?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There is the same comment for the following interfaces:
> > > > >
> > > > > - IgniteAtomicReference
> > > > > - IgniteAtomicSequence
> > > > > - IgniteAtomicStamped
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All
> > previously
> > > > > > described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no
> > async
> > > > > > operations in it's implemenation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vladimir.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Andrey Gura
> > > > > GridGain Systems, Inc.
> > > > > www.gridgain.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrey Gura
> > GridGain Systems, Inc.
> > www.gridgain.com
> >
>