Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
Locked
1234
... 6
1234
... 6
Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
 
|
Hello Igniters,
AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to start the discussion about 2.9 release. I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver features as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next release earlier then postpone the current release. I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 Voting Date: July 31, 2020 Release Date: August 7, 2019 WDYT? [1] : http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
++1 for Alexey as a release manager, that's good we are keeping a rotation
of RMs so every committer/PMC knows how to release the code. 0 for dates, actually, it is up to contributors to propose alternatives. All in all, it is up to the discussion's course. Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > Hello Igniters, > > AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to start > the discussion about 2.9 release. > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > > What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver features > as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates > we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > release earlier then postpone the current release. > > I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > WDYT? > > [1] : > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
In reply to this post by Alexey Plekhanov
Hello!
Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the current 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. So I'm asking whether it is worth it. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > Hello Igniters, > > AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to start > the discussion about 2.9 release. > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > > What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver features > as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates > we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > release earlier then postpone the current release. > > I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > WDYT? > > [1] : > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
Snapshots.
> 3 июня 2020 г., в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]> написал(а): > > Hello! > > Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > > I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the current > 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > > So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > >> Hello Igniters, >> >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to start >> the discussion about 2.9 release. >> >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. >> >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver features >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next >> release earlier then postpone the current release. >> >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: >> >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 >> >> WDYT? >> >> [1] : >> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 >> |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
Cellular switch
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:10 PM Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]> wrote: > Snapshots. > > > 3 июня 2020 г., в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]> > написал(а): > > > > Hello! > > > > Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > > > > I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the > current > > 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > > > > So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > > > >> Hello Igniters, > >> > >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > start > >> the discussion about 2.9 release. > >> > >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > >> > >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > features > >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release > dates > >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > >> release earlier then postpone the current release. > >> > >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > >> > >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> [1] : > >> > >> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > >> > > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
In reply to this post by Ilya Kasnacheev
Ilya,
We already have a lot of features implemented in the master branch, but not released (perhaps not so big as Calcite, but still useful), some of them already mentioned in the previous thread: - Sandbox for user-defined code - .NET: Native Near Cache - TDE - Phase-2. Master key rotation - Thin client: compute support - Snapshots - Tasks/services cancellation commands etc. ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > Hello! > > Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > > I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the current > 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > > So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > start > > the discussion about 2.9 release. > > > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > > > > What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > features > > as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates > > we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > > release earlier then postpone the current release. > > > > I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > > > Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > > Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > > Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > > Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > > > WDYT? > > > > [1] : > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > > > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
+1 To start release process for 2.9
+1 For Alexey Plekhanov as a release manager. > 3 июня 2020 г., в 16:34, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> написал(а): > > Ilya, > > We already have a lot of features implemented in the master branch, but not > released (perhaps not so big as Calcite, but still useful), some of them > already mentioned in the previous thread: > - Sandbox for user-defined code > - .NET: Native Near Cache > - TDE - Phase-2. Master key rotation > - Thin client: compute support > - Snapshots > - Tasks/services cancellation commands > etc. > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > >> Hello! >> >> Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? >> >> I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the current >> 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. >> >> So I'm asking whether it is worth it. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Ilya Kasnacheev >> >> >> ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: >> >>> Hello Igniters, >>> >>> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to >> start >>> the discussion about 2.9 release. >>> >>> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. >>> >>> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver >> features >>> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates >>> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next >>> release earlier then postpone the current release. >>> >>> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: >>> >>> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 >>> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 >>> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 >>> Release Date: August 7, 2019 >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> [1] : >>> >>> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 >>> >> |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
+1 to start release and Alexey Plekhanov as a release manager.
Alexey, can you clarify why we need a month for scope and code freeze phases? What should we wait for? Maybe I'm missing something, but the scope for the release already exists. So, I'd like to suggest the following dates: Code Freeze: June 10, 2020 Voting Date: July 1, 2020 Release Date: July 7, 2019 On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 16:38, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]> wrote: > > +1 To start release process for 2.9 > +1 For Alexey Plekhanov as a release manager. > > > 3 июня 2020 г., в 16:34, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> написал(а): > > > > Ilya, > > > > We already have a lot of features implemented in the master branch, but not > > released (perhaps not so big as Calcite, but still useful), some of them > > already mentioned in the previous thread: > > - Sandbox for user-defined code > > - .NET: Native Near Cache > > - TDE - Phase-2. Master key rotation > > - Thin client: compute support > > - Snapshots > > - Tasks/services cancellation commands > > etc. > > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > > > >> Hello! > >> > >> Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > >> > >> I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the current > >> 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > >> > >> So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > >> > >> Regards, > >> -- > >> Ilya Kasnacheev > >> > >> > >> ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > >> > >>> Hello Igniters, > >>> > >>> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > >> start > >>> the discussion about 2.9 release. > >>> > >>> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > >>> > >>> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > >> features > >>> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates > >>> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > >>> release earlier then postpone the current release. > >>> > >>> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > >>> > >>> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > >>> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > >>> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > >>> Release Date: August 7, 2019 > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> [1] : > >>> > >>> > >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > >>> > >> > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
Hello!
I think we should have at least a month before code freeze. People may have code planned for commit and we don't want to rush them and commit sub-optimal code. Otherwise, +1. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 17:24, Maxim Muzafarov <[hidden email]>: > +1 to start release and Alexey Plekhanov as a release manager. > > > Alexey, can you clarify why we need a month for scope and code freeze > phases? What should we wait for? Maybe I'm missing something, but the > scope for the release already exists. > > So, I'd like to suggest the following dates: > > Code Freeze: June 10, 2020 > Voting Date: July 1, 2020 > Release Date: July 7, 2019 > > On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 16:38, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > +1 To start release process for 2.9 > > +1 For Alexey Plekhanov as a release manager. > > > > > 3 июня 2020 г., в 16:34, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> > написал(а): > > > > > > Ilya, > > > > > > We already have a lot of features implemented in the master branch, > but not > > > released (perhaps not so big as Calcite, but still useful), some of > them > > > already mentioned in the previous thread: > > > - Sandbox for user-defined code > > > - .NET: Native Near Cache > > > - TDE - Phase-2. Master key rotation > > > - Thin client: compute support > > > - Snapshots > > > - Tasks/services cancellation commands > > > etc. > > > > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email] > >: > > > > > >> Hello! > > >> > > >> Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > > >> > > >> I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the > current > > >> 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > > >> > > >> So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> -- > > >> Ilya Kasnacheev > > >> > > >> > > >> ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > > >> > > >>> Hello Igniters, > > >>> > > >>> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > > >> start > > >>> the discussion about 2.9 release. > > >>> > > >>> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 > release. > > >>> > > >>> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > > >> features > > >>> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release > dates > > >>> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the > next > > >>> release earlier then postpone the current release. > > >>> > > >>> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > >>> > > >>> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > > >>> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > > >>> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > > >>> Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > >>> > > >>> WDYT? > > >>> > > >>> [1] : > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > > >>> > > >> > > > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
Ilya,
I've assumed that the next 2.10 release will start in August, so folks can commit their changes without a rush. Another option, everyone can ask in the current thread to wait for their changes :-) On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 17:29, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hello! > > I think we should have at least a month before code freeze. People may have > code planned for commit and we don't want to rush them and commit > sub-optimal code. > > Otherwise, +1. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 17:24, Maxim Muzafarov <[hidden email]>: > > > +1 to start release and Alexey Plekhanov as a release manager. > > > > > > Alexey, can you clarify why we need a month for scope and code freeze > > phases? What should we wait for? Maybe I'm missing something, but the > > scope for the release already exists. > > > > So, I'd like to suggest the following dates: > > > > Code Freeze: June 10, 2020 > > Voting Date: July 1, 2020 > > Release Date: July 7, 2019 > > > > On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 16:38, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 To start release process for 2.9 > > > +1 For Alexey Plekhanov as a release manager. > > > > > > > 3 июня 2020 г., в 16:34, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> > > написал(а): > > > > > > > > Ilya, > > > > > > > > We already have a lot of features implemented in the master branch, > > but not > > > > released (perhaps not so big as Calcite, but still useful), some of > > them > > > > already mentioned in the previous thread: > > > > - Sandbox for user-defined code > > > > - .NET: Native Near Cache > > > > - TDE - Phase-2. Master key rotation > > > > - Thin client: compute support > > > > - Snapshots > > > > - Tasks/services cancellation commands > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email] > > >: > > > > > > > >> Hello! > > > >> > > > >> Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > > > >> > > > >> I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the > > current > > > >> 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > > > >> > > > >> So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> -- > > > >> Ilya Kasnacheev > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > > > >> > > > >>> Hello Igniters, > > > >>> > > > >>> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > > > >> start > > > >>> the discussion about 2.9 release. > > > >>> > > > >>> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 > > release. > > > >>> > > > >>> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > > > >> features > > > >>> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release > > dates > > > >>> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the > > next > > > >>> release earlier then postpone the current release. > > > >>> > > > >>> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > > >>> > > > >>> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > > > >>> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > > > >>> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > > > >>> Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > > >>> > > > >>> WDYT? > > > >>> > > > >>> [1] : > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
In reply to this post by Ilya Kasnacheev
Cluster read-only mode and new cluster state change API.
ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > Hello! > > Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > > I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the current > 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > > So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > start > > the discussion about 2.9 release. > > > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > > > > What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > features > > as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates > > we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > > release earlier then postpone the current release. > > > > I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > > > Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > > Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > > Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > > Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > > > WDYT? > > > > [1] : > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > > > -- BR, Sergey Antonov |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
+1 for initial dates, RM candidate, need June to finish and test features
Model export/import for ML and a fewminor fixes ср, 3 июн. 2020 г., 18:05 Sergey Antonov <[hidden email]>: > Cluster read-only mode and new cluster state change API. > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 16:10, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>: > > > Hello! > > > > Can you please clarify what is the scope of 2.9 release? > > > > I have a feeling that we don't really have any big features in the > current > > 2.9 code base. No Calcite, etc. > > > > So I'm asking whether it is worth it. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > ср, 3 июн. 2020 г. в 14:45, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > > > AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > > start > > > the discussion about 2.9 release. > > > > > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > > > > > > What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > > features > > > as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release > dates > > > we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > > > release earlier then postpone the current release. > > > > > > I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > > > > > Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > > > Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > > > Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > > > Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > [1] : > > > > > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > > > > > > > > -- > BR, Sergey Antonov > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Alexey Plekhanov
Hi folks,
The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. I'd like only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is about to finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the code freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html - Denis On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello Igniters, > > AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to start > the discussion about 2.9 release. > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > > What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver features > as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates > we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > release earlier then postpone the current release. > > I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > > Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > Release Date: August 7, 2019 > > WDYT? > > [1] : > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
Hi,
Indeed, the tracing feature is almost ready. Discovery, communication and transactions tracing will be introduced, as well as an option to configure tracing in runtime. Right now we are working on final performance optimizations, but it's very likely that we'll complete this activity before the code freeze date. Let's include tracing to the 2.9 release scope. More info: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-48%3A+Tracing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 -- Best Regards, Ivan Rakov On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. I'd like > only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is about to > finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov > <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 > deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the code > freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. > > [1] > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html > > - > Denis > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> Hello Igniters, >> >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to >> start >> the discussion about 2.9 release. >> >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. >> >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver >> features >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release dates >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next >> release earlier then postpone the current release. >> >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: >> >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 >> >> WDYT? >> >> [1] : >> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 >> > |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
Hello,
Sorry for the delay. Sergey Chugunov ([hidden email]) just replied to the main conversation about "communication via discovery" [1]. We work on it together and recently have found one hard-to-fix scenario, detailed description is provided in Sergey's reply. In short, July 10th looks realistic only if we introduce new behavior in its current implementation, with new setting and IgniteExperimental status. Blocker here is current implementation of Continuos Query protocol that in some cases (described at the end) initiates TCP connection right from discovery thread which obviously leads to deadlock. We haven't estimated efforts needed to redesign of CQ protocol but it is definitely a risk and fixing it isn't feasible with a code freeze at 10th of July. So my verdict: we can include this new feature in 2.9 scope as experimental and with highlighted limitation on CQ usage. Is that OK? CQ limitation: server needs to open a communication connection to the client if during CQ registration client tries to p2p deploy new class not available on server classpath. In other cases registration of CQ should be fine. [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html вт, 9 июн. 2020 г. в 19:36, Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > Indeed, the tracing feature is almost ready. Discovery, communication and > transactions tracing will be introduced, as well as an option to configure > tracing in runtime. Right now we are working on final performance > optimizations, but it's very likely that we'll complete this activity > before the code freeze date. > Let's include tracing to the 2.9 release scope. > > More info: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-48%3A+Tracing > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 > > -- > Best Regards, > Ivan Rakov > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. I'd > like > > only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is about > to > > finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov > > <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 > > deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the code > > freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. > > > > [1] > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html > > > > - > > Denis > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello Igniters, > >> > >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to > >> start > >> the discussion about 2.9 release. > >> > >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. > >> > >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > >> features > >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release > dates > >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next > >> release earlier then postpone the current release. > >> > >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > >> > >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> [1] : > >> > >> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > >> > > > -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Bessonov |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
> Is that OK?
We shouldn’t add any code that is broke some existing, widely used feature. Let’s fix it before the merge. > 10 июня 2020 г., в 13:54, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]> написал(а): > > Hello, > > Sorry for the delay. Sergey Chugunov ([hidden email]) just > replied > to the main conversation about "communication via discovery" [1]. We work > on it > together and recently have found one hard-to-fix scenario, detailed > description is > provided in Sergey's reply. > > In short, July 10th looks realistic only if we introduce new behavior in > its current > implementation, with new setting and IgniteExperimental status. Blocker > here is > current implementation of Continuos Query protocol that in some cases > (described > at the end) initiates TCP connection right from discovery thread which > obviously > leads to deadlock. We haven't estimated efforts needed to redesign of CQ > protocol > but it is definitely a risk and fixing it isn't feasible with a code freeze > at 10th of July. > So my verdict: we can include this new feature in 2.9 scope as experimental > and with > highlighted limitation on CQ usage. Is that OK? > > CQ limitation: server needs to open a communication connection to the > client if during > CQ registration client tries to p2p deploy new class not available on > server classpath. > In other cases registration of CQ should be fine. > > [1] > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html > > вт, 9 июн. 2020 г. в 19:36, Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>: > >> Hi, >> >> Indeed, the tracing feature is almost ready. Discovery, communication and >> transactions tracing will be introduced, as well as an option to configure >> tracing in runtime. Right now we are working on final performance >> optimizations, but it's very likely that we'll complete this activity >> before the code freeze date. >> Let's include tracing to the 2.9 release scope. >> >> More info: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-48%3A+Tracing >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Ivan Rakov >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. I'd >> like >>> only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is about >> to >>> finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov >>> <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 >>> deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the code >>> freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. >>> >>> [1] >>> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html >>> >>> - >>> Denis >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Igniters, >>>> >>>> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to >>>> start >>>> the discussion about 2.9 release. >>>> >>>> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. >>>> >>>> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver >>>> features >>>> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release >> dates >>>> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next >>>> release earlier then postpone the current release. >>>> >>>> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: >>>> >>>> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 >>>> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 >>>> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 >>>> Release Date: August 7, 2019 >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> [1] : >>>> >>>> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Ivan Bessonov |
|
|
In reply to this post by Ivan Bessonov
Ivan, Sergey,
How much effort should we put to resolve the issue with continuous queries? Are you working on that issue actively? Let's try to guess what would be the ETA. - Denis On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 3:55 AM Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the delay. Sergey Chugunov ([hidden email]) just > replied > to the main conversation about "communication via discovery" [1]. We work > on it > together and recently have found one hard-to-fix scenario, detailed > description is > provided in Sergey's reply. > > In short, July 10th looks realistic only if we introduce new behavior in > its current > implementation, with new setting and IgniteExperimental status. Blocker > here is > current implementation of Continuos Query protocol that in some cases > (described > at the end) initiates TCP connection right from discovery thread which > obviously > leads to deadlock. We haven't estimated efforts needed to redesign of CQ > protocol > but it is definitely a risk and fixing it isn't feasible with a code > freeze at 10th of July. > So my verdict: we can include this new feature in 2.9 scope as > experimental and with > highlighted limitation on CQ usage. Is that OK? > > CQ limitation: server needs to open a communication connection to the > client if during > CQ registration client tries to p2p deploy new class not available on > server classpath. > In other cases registration of CQ should be fine. > > [1] > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html > > вт, 9 июн. 2020 г. в 19:36, Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>: > >> Hi, >> >> Indeed, the tracing feature is almost ready. Discovery, communication and >> transactions tracing will be introduced, as well as an option to configure >> tracing in runtime. Right now we are working on final performance >> optimizations, but it's very likely that we'll complete this activity >> before the code freeze date. >> Let's include tracing to the 2.9 release scope. >> >> More info: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-48%3A+Tracing >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Ivan Rakov >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. I'd >> like >> > only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is about >> to >> > finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov >> > <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 >> > deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the code >> > freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. >> > >> > [1] >> > >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html >> > >> > - >> > Denis >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hello Igniters, >> >> >> >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to >> >> start >> >> the discussion about 2.9 release. >> >> >> >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. >> >> >> >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver >> >> features >> >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release >> dates >> >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the next >> >> release earlier then postpone the current release. >> >> >> >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: >> >> >> >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 >> >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 >> >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 >> >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 >> >> >> >> WDYT? >> >> >> >> [1] : >> >> >> >> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 >> >> >> > >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Ivan Bessonov > |
|
|
Sergey, Ivan,
Could you please check the questions below? If it's time-consuming to rework continuous queries, then the new mode can become available in the experimental state and should not let register continuous queries to avoid potential deadlocks. Overall, this design gap in continuous queries was like a bomb that has just detonated [1]. Anyway, this new connectivity mode will be priceless even if you can't use continuous queries with them because right now we cannot even start a thick client inside of a serverless function. Alexey Plehanov, It looks like we can proceed with the release taking your timelines. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13156 - Denis On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:16 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > Ivan, Sergey, > > How much effort should we put to resolve the issue with > continuous queries? Are you working on that issue actively? Let's try to > guess what would be the ETA. > > - > Denis > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 3:55 AM Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Sorry for the delay. Sergey Chugunov ([hidden email]) just >> replied >> to the main conversation about "communication via discovery" [1]. We work >> on it >> together and recently have found one hard-to-fix scenario, detailed >> description is >> provided in Sergey's reply. >> >> In short, July 10th looks realistic only if we introduce new behavior in >> its current >> implementation, with new setting and IgniteExperimental status. Blocker >> here is >> current implementation of Continuos Query protocol that in some cases >> (described >> at the end) initiates TCP connection right from discovery thread which >> obviously >> leads to deadlock. We haven't estimated efforts needed to redesign of CQ >> protocol >> but it is definitely a risk and fixing it isn't feasible with a code >> freeze at 10th of July. >> So my verdict: we can include this new feature in 2.9 scope as >> experimental and with >> highlighted limitation on CQ usage. Is that OK? >> >> CQ limitation: server needs to open a communication connection to the >> client if during >> CQ registration client tries to p2p deploy new class not available on >> server classpath. >> In other cases registration of CQ should be fine. >> >> [1] >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html >> >> вт, 9 июн. 2020 г. в 19:36, Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Indeed, the tracing feature is almost ready. Discovery, communication and >>> transactions tracing will be introduced, as well as an option to >>> configure >>> tracing in runtime. Right now we are working on final performance >>> optimizations, but it's very likely that we'll complete this activity >>> before the code freeze date. >>> Let's include tracing to the 2.9 release scope. >>> >>> More info: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-48%3A+Tracing >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Ivan Rakov >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi folks, >>> > >>> > The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. I'd >>> like >>> > only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is >>> about to >>> > finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov >>> > <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 >>> > deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the code >>> > freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. >>> > >>> > [1] >>> > >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html >>> > >>> > - >>> > Denis >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hello Igniters, >>> >> >>> >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to >>> >> start >>> >> the discussion about 2.9 release. >>> >> >>> >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 release. >>> >> >>> >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver >>> >> features >>> >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release >>> dates >>> >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the >>> next >>> >> release earlier then postpone the current release. >>> >> >>> >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: >>> >> >>> >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 >>> >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 >>> >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 >>> >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 >>> >> >>> >> WDYT? >>> >> >>> >> [1] : >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely yours, >> Ivan Bessonov >> > |
|
|
Igniters,
Are we moving forward with this release? Alex Plehanov, are you still ready to manage it? It seems like everyone agreed with the timeline you proposed in the very beginning. - Denis On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:52 AM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > Sergey, Ivan, > > Could you please check the questions below? If it's time-consuming to > rework continuous queries, then the new mode can become available in the > experimental state and should not let register continuous queries to avoid > potential deadlocks. Overall, this design gap in continuous queries was > like a bomb that has just detonated [1]. Anyway, this new connectivity mode > will be priceless even if you can't use continuous queries with them > because right now we cannot even start a thick client inside of a > serverless function. > > Alexey Plehanov, > > It looks like we can proceed with the release taking your timelines. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13156 > > - > Denis > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:16 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Ivan, Sergey, >> >> How much effort should we put to resolve the issue with >> continuous queries? Are you working on that issue actively? Let's try to >> guess what would be the ETA. >> >> - >> Denis >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 3:55 AM Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Sorry for the delay. Sergey Chugunov ([hidden email]) just >>> replied >>> to the main conversation about "communication via discovery" [1]. We >>> work on it >>> together and recently have found one hard-to-fix scenario, detailed >>> description is >>> provided in Sergey's reply. >>> >>> In short, July 10th looks realistic only if we introduce new behavior in >>> its current >>> implementation, with new setting and IgniteExperimental status. Blocker >>> here is >>> current implementation of Continuos Query protocol that in some cases >>> (described >>> at the end) initiates TCP connection right from discovery thread which >>> obviously >>> leads to deadlock. We haven't estimated efforts needed to redesign of CQ >>> protocol >>> but it is definitely a risk and fixing it isn't feasible with a code >>> freeze at 10th of July. >>> So my verdict: we can include this new feature in 2.9 scope as >>> experimental and with >>> highlighted limitation on CQ usage. Is that OK? >>> >>> CQ limitation: server needs to open a communication connection to the >>> client if during >>> CQ registration client tries to p2p deploy new class not available on >>> server classpath. >>> In other cases registration of CQ should be fine. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html >>> >>> вт, 9 июн. 2020 г. в 19:36, Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Indeed, the tracing feature is almost ready. Discovery, communication >>>> and >>>> transactions tracing will be introduced, as well as an option to >>>> configure >>>> tracing in runtime. Right now we are working on final performance >>>> optimizations, but it's very likely that we'll complete this activity >>>> before the code freeze date. >>>> Let's include tracing to the 2.9 release scope. >>>> >>>> More info: >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-48%3A+Tracing >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Ivan Rakov >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi folks, >>>> > >>>> > The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. I'd >>>> like >>>> > only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is >>>> about to >>>> > finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov >>>> > <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 >>>> > deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the code >>>> > freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. >>>> > >>>> > [1] >>>> > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html >>>> > >>>> > - >>>> > Denis >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov <[hidden email] >>>> > >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Hello Igniters, >>>> >> >>>> >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time to >>>> >> start >>>> >> the discussion about 2.9 release. >>>> >> >>>> >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 >>>> release. >>>> >> >>>> >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver >>>> >> features >>>> >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release >>>> dates >>>> >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the >>>> next >>>> >> release earlier then postpone the current release. >>>> >> >>>> >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: >>>> >> >>>> >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 >>>> >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 >>>> >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 >>>> >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 >>>> >> >>>> >> WDYT? >>>> >> >>>> >> [1] : >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely yours, >>> Ivan Bessonov >>> >> |
Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
|
|
Denis,
Yes, I still ready to manage it. Today I will prepare a release page on wiki and will try to go over tickets list. Also, I have plans to cut the branch by the end of next week if there are no objections. пт, 26 июн. 2020 г. в 03:48, Denis Magda <[hidden email]>: > Igniters, > > Are we moving forward with this release? Alex Plehanov, are you still ready > to manage it? It seems like everyone agreed with the timeline you proposed > in the very beginning. > > - > Denis > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:52 AM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Sergey, Ivan, > > > > Could you please check the questions below? If it's time-consuming to > > rework continuous queries, then the new mode can become available in the > > experimental state and should not let register continuous queries to > avoid > > potential deadlocks. Overall, this design gap in continuous queries was > > like a bomb that has just detonated [1]. Anyway, this new connectivity > mode > > will be priceless even if you can't use continuous queries with them > > because right now we cannot even start a thick client inside of a > > serverless function. > > > > Alexey Plehanov, > > > > It looks like we can proceed with the release taking your timelines. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13156 > > > > - > > Denis > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:16 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> Ivan, Sergey, > >> > >> How much effort should we put to resolve the issue with > >> continuous queries? Are you working on that issue actively? Let's try to > >> guess what would be the ETA. > >> > >> - > >> Denis > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 3:55 AM Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Sorry for the delay. Sergey Chugunov ([hidden email]) just > >>> replied > >>> to the main conversation about "communication via discovery" [1]. We > >>> work on it > >>> together and recently have found one hard-to-fix scenario, detailed > >>> description is > >>> provided in Sergey's reply. > >>> > >>> In short, July 10th looks realistic only if we introduce new behavior > in > >>> its current > >>> implementation, with new setting and IgniteExperimental status. Blocker > >>> here is > >>> current implementation of Continuos Query protocol that in some cases > >>> (described > >>> at the end) initiates TCP connection right from discovery thread which > >>> obviously > >>> leads to deadlock. We haven't estimated efforts needed to redesign of > CQ > >>> protocol > >>> but it is definitely a risk and fixing it isn't feasible with a code > >>> freeze at 10th of July. > >>> So my verdict: we can include this new feature in 2.9 scope as > >>> experimental and with > >>> highlighted limitation on CQ usage. Is that OK? > >>> > >>> CQ limitation: server needs to open a communication connection to the > >>> client if during > >>> CQ registration client tries to p2p deploy new class not available on > >>> server classpath. > >>> In other cases registration of CQ should be fine. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html > >>> > >>> вт, 9 июн. 2020 г. в 19:36, Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Indeed, the tracing feature is almost ready. Discovery, communication > >>>> and > >>>> transactions tracing will be introduced, as well as an option to > >>>> configure > >>>> tracing in runtime. Right now we are working on final performance > >>>> optimizations, but it's very likely that we'll complete this activity > >>>> before the code freeze date. > >>>> Let's include tracing to the 2.9 release scope. > >>>> > >>>> More info: > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-48%3A+Tracing > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13060 > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Best Regards, > >>>> Ivan Rakov > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Denis Magda <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Hi folks, > >>>> > > >>>> > The timelines proposed by Alex Plekhanov sounds reasonable to me. > I'd > >>>> like > >>>> > only to hear inputs of @Ivan Rakov <[hidden email]>, who is > >>>> about to > >>>> > finish with the tracing support, and @Ivan Bessonov > >>>> > <[hidden email]>, who is fixing a serious limitation for K8 > >>>> > deployments [1]. Most likely, both features will be ready by the > code > >>>> > freeze date (July 10), but the guys should know it better. > >>>> > > >>>> > [1] > >>>> > > >>>> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-New-Ignite-settings-for-IGNITE-12438-and-IGNITE-13013-td47586.html > >>>> > > >>>> > - > >>>> > Denis > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:45 AM Alex Plehanov < > [hidden email] > >>>> > > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> >> Hello Igniters, > >>>> >> > >>>> >> AI 2.8.1 is finally released and as we discussed here [1] its time > to > >>>> >> start > >>>> >> the discussion about 2.9 release. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I want to propose myself to be the release manager of the 2.9 > >>>> release. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> What about release time, I agree with Maxim that we should deliver > >>>> >> features > >>>> >> as frequently as possible. If some feature doesn't fit into release > >>>> dates > >>>> >> we should better include it into the next release and schedule the > >>>> next > >>>> >> release earlier then postpone the current release. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I propose the following dates for 2.9 release: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Scope Freeze: June 26, 2020 > >>>> >> Code Freeze: July 10, 2020 > >>>> >> Voting Date: July 31, 2020 > >>>> >> Release Date: August 7, 2019 > >>>> >> > >>>> >> WDYT? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> [1] : > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Releases-Plan-td47360.html#a47575 > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sincerely yours, > >>> Ivan Bessonov > >>> > >> > |
«
Return to Apache Ignite Developers - Legacy Mail Archive
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |