Apache Ignite 2.8.1 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

[Alexey Plekhanov]

Hello guys,

While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for cache
with indexed types
IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and entry
expiration when persistent is enabled
Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed already
merged to master.

WDYT?

пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:

> Taras.
>
> Thank you, very much!
> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>
> Igniters,
>
> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>
> OPEN:
>
> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error on
> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
> Pavel Tupitsyn
>
> IN PROGRESS:
>
> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on really
> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready) state
> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>
> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>
> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
> Voronkin
> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command - YuJue Li
> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be handled
> - Nikolai Kulagin
> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and checkpoint
> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected row
> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>
>
> > 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets to
> port into 2.8.1:
> >
> > IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
> disable SQL functions.
> > IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values while
> traversing index tree.
> > IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> > IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read to
> unlock the GridH2Table.
> >
> > TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> > Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> >
> > [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> > [2].
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >
> >
> > On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> >> Hello, Igniters.
> >>
> >> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> >>
> >>
> >> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already in the
> cluster from newly joined ones.
> >>
> >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Mikhail.
> >>
> >> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> >>> Hello, Ivan.
> >>>
> >>> I think we can include this improvements.
> >>> Please, go ahead.
> >>>
> >>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Igniters,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that we
> need 3
> >>>> more cherry-picks
> >>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my initial
> >>>> attempt to create that PR.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
> components
> >>>> and tests for them,
> >>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without changes
> in
> >>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in the
> scope?
> >>>> If you don't,
> >>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
> myself, I
> >>>> guess it would be
> >>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> >>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> >>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> >>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> >>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in IGNITE-12683
> [1][2].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> >>>>> [2]
> >>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> >>>>>
> >>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding BPlusTree
> >>>>> [1], [2]
> >>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> >>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and 2.8.1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]
> >:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch that
> >>>>> contain
> >>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
> >>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP
> >>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> >>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> >>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics related
> >>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on node
> start.
> >>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
> SPI
> >>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> [hidden email]
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
> SPI
> >>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
> >>>>> probably ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you ok
> >>>>> with it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> [hidden email]
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be
> >>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> >>>>> partition -
> >>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
> >>>>> contribution
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log
> >>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> memory
> >>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
> with
> >>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage.
> >>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with
> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> exception
> >>>>> -
> >>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> >>>>> shutdown on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
> >>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> MERGE
> >>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> generation for
> >>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
> PME can
> >>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> topology
> >>>>>>>> caused by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> MapResult
> >>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> Data. -
> >>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value
> >>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of
> >>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
> policy
> >>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> type in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> historical
> >>>>> one
> >>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization
> of
> >>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
> >>>>> server
> >>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545
> >>>>> Introduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition map
> >>>>> exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>> events
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues
> for
> >>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
> >>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
> >>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479
> Make
> >>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
> >>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
> >>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on
> near
> >>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
> nodes
> >>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> join. -
> >>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227 Fix
> >>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
> >>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
> and
> >>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
> >>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> >>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of commits to
> >>>>>>>> transfer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from Mira
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>    git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>    git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
> dirty
> >>>>> python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>         ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>         tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>         founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>
> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>         if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>             print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>             founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> configuration
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log
> >>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> memory
> >>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
> with
> >>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage.
> >>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with
> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be
> >>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> exception -
> >>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> partition
> >>>>> -
> >>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> shutdown
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
> (#7495)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation in
> CLI
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> REST.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> (#7474)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE
> >>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation
> for
> >>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME
> can
> >>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology
> >>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> MapResult
> >>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> Data. -
> >>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value
> >>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of
> >>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
> policy
> >>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type
> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> historical
> >>>>> one -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of
> >>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
> >>>>> server
> >>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues
> for
> >>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
> >>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
> >>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
> >>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
> >>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on
> near
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
> nodes
> >>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> join. -
> >>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
> >>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
> and
> >>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
> >>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is started
> in
> >>>>>>>> 'prefer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
> cache
> >>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> >>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid properties
> -
> >>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of lower-case
> >>>>>>>> statements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't show
> >>>>> histogram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
> character
> >>>>>>>> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> >>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch available
> >>>>> then and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the
> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets for
> >>>>> 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>> master, do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1 yourself
> or
> >>>>>>>> should I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
> suppose
> >>>>> it
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
> current
> >>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who is a
> >>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1] who
> is a
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should not
> we
> >>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread to
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
> bug-fixes
> >>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can cause
> node
> >>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
> >>>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
> >>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop properly on
> >>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents
> main()
> >>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for checkpoint
> read
> >>>>>>>> lock,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This fix
> >>>>> brings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a large
> >>>>> number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
> 2.8.0
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker
> issues
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think we
> >>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule the
> next
> >>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits for
> the
> >>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
> release
> >>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the release
> and
> >>>>>>>> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
> blocker
> >>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native
> >>>>>>>> persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release
> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
> these 2
> >>>>> open
> >>>>>>>> PRs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
> >>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release
> >>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
> >>>>> committers,
> >>>>>>>> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we can
> >>>>> close
> >>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
> time,
> >>>>> can
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard
> under
> >>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the
> release
> >>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
> Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related
> to SQL
> >>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8
> >>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue,
> e.g.
> >>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries
> from
> >>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we
> >>>>> already
> >>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on
> the
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is
> the
> >>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
> schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
> anybody
> >>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey
> >>>>> Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774
> >>>>> Transaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
> >>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch
> under
> >>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey
> >>>>> Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits
> to
> >>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
> opinion
> >>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are
> ready
> >>>>> end
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long as
> >>>>> there
> >>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your
> >>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> >>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
> failing
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's
> >>>>> states can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable
> >>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on
> >>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
> rebalance
> >>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
> cluster and
> >>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures
> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction
> >>>>>>>> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
> >>>>> record
> >>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead
> of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
> version
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
> >>>>> thrown
> >>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues
> for
> >>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache
> which
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
> >>>>> state
> >>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized
> enum
> >>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find
> the
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
> record
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
> during
> >>>>>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
> owned by
> >>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on
> node
> >>>>>>>> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> >>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between
> cache
> >>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference
> >>>>> output
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated
> >>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by
> >>>>>>>> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>
> > --
> > Taras Ledkov
> > Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >
>
>

[Nikolay Izhikov-2]

Hello, Alex.

+1 from me.

> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>
> Hello guys,
>
> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for cache
> with indexed types
> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and entry
> expiration when persistent is enabled
> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed already
> merged to master.
>
> WDYT?
>
> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Taras.
>>
>> Thank you, very much!
>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>>
>> Igniters,
>>
>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>>
>> OPEN:
>>
>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error on
>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
>> Pavel Tupitsyn
>>
>> IN PROGRESS:
>>
>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on really
>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready) state
>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>>
>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>>
>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
>> Voronkin
>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command - YuJue Li
>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be handled
>> - Nikolai Kulagin
>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and checkpoint
>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected row
>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>>
>>
>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
>> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets to
>> port into 2.8.1:
>>>
>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
>> disable SQL functions.
>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values while
>> traversing index tree.
>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read to
>> unlock the GridH2Table.
>>>
>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
>>>
>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
>>> [2].
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already in the
>> cluster from newly joined ones.
>>>>
>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>
>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
>>>>> Please, go ahead.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
>> написал(а):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that we
>> need 3
>>>>>> more cherry-picks
>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my initial
>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
>> components
>>>>>> and tests for them,
>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without changes
>> in
>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in the
>> scope?
>>>>>> If you don't,
>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
>> myself, I
>>>>>> guess it would be
>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in IGNITE-12683
>> [1][2].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding BPlusTree
>>>>>>> [1], [2]
>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]
>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch that
>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP
>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics related
>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on node
>> start.
>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
>>>>>>> probably ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you ok
>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be
>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>>>> partition -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
>>>>>>> contribution
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log
>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>> memory
>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
>> with
>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage.
>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>> exception
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>>>> shutdown on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>> generation for
>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
>> PME can
>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>> topology
>>>>>>>>>> caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of
>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
>> policy
>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>> type in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>> historical
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization
>> of
>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545
>>>>>>> Introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition map
>>>>>>> exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479
>> Make
>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on
>> near
>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>> join. -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227 Fix
>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of commits to
>>>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from Mira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
>> upstream-http/master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
>> dirty
>>>>>>> python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    if not line.startswith('-'):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        ticket = line[:-1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        tickets.add(ticket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        founded[ticket] = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>
>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    for ticket in tickets:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        if ticket in commit_msg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            print(commit_msg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            founded[ticket] += 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
>> configuration
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log
>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>> memory
>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
>> with
>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage.
>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be
>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>> exception -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>> partition
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>> shutdown
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
>> (#7495)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation in
>> CLI
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> REST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
>> (#7474)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE
>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME
>> can
>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology
>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>> MapResult
>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of
>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
>> policy
>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>> historical
>>>>>>> one -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of
>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on
>> near
>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>> join. -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is started
>> in
>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
>> cache
>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid properties
>> -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of lower-case
>>>>>>>>>> statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't show
>>>>>>> histogram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
>> character
>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch available
>>>>>>> then and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the
>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets for
>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>> master, do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1 yourself
>> or
>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
>> suppose
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
>> current
>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who is a
>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1] who
>> is a
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should not
>> we
>>>>>>>>>> reflect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread to
>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
>> bug-fixes
>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can cause
>> node
>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop properly on
>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents
>> main()
>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for checkpoint
>> read
>>>>>>>>>> lock,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This fix
>>>>>>> brings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a large
>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
>> 2.8.0
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker
>> issues
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think we
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule the
>> next
>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits for
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
>> release
>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the release
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native
>>>>>>>>>> persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release
>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
>> these 2
>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release
>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
>>>>>>> committers,
>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we can
>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
>> time,
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard
>> under
>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the
>> release
>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
>> Ledkov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related
>> to SQL
>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8
>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
>> thread-safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue,
>> e.g.
>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries
>> from
>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we
>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is
>> the
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
>> schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
>> anybody
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey
>>>>>>> Antonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>> Transaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch
>> under
>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey
>>>>>>> Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits
>> to
>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
>> opinion
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are
>> ready
>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long as
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your
>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
>> failing
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's
>>>>>>> states can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable
>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on
>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
>> rebalance
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
>> cluster and
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction
>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead
>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
>> version
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
>>>>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache
>> which
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized
>> enum
>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find
>> the
>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
>> record
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
>> during
>>>>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
>> owned by
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on
>> node
>>>>>>>>>> join.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between
>> cache
>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference
>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated
>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by
>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Taras Ledkov
>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>
>>
>>

[Alexey Plekhanov]

Nikolay,

TC results: [1], [2]
I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1

[1]:
https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
[2]:
https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1

вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:

> Hello, Alex.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> > 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> > cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> > IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for cache
> > with indexed types
> > IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and entry
> > expiration when persistent is enabled
> > Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed already
> > merged to master.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> Taras.
> >>
> >> Thank you, very much!
> >> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>
> >> Igniters,
> >>
> >> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
> >>
> >> OPEN:
> >>
> >> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error on
> >> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> >> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
> >> Pavel Tupitsyn
> >>
> >> IN PROGRESS:
> >>
> >> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on really
> >> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> >> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready) state
> >> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
> >>
> >> PATCH AVAILABLE:
> >>
> >> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
> >> Voronkin
> >> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command - YuJue
> Li
> >> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
> handled
> >> - Nikolai Kulagin
> >> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
> >> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> >> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
> checkpoint
> >> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> >> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected row
> >> key - Denis Mekhanikov
> >>
> >>
> >>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
> >> написал(а):
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets to
> >> port into 2.8.1:
> >>>
> >>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
> >> disable SQL functions.
> >>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values while
> >> traversing index tree.
> >>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read to
> >> unlock the GridH2Table.
> >>>
> >>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> >>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> >>>
> >>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> >>> [2].
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> >>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>
> >>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> >> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
> >> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already in
> the
> >> cluster from newly joined ones.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Mikhail.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> >>>>> Hello, Ivan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
> >>>>> Please, go ahead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
> >> написал(а):
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Igniters,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that we
> >> need 3
> >>>>>> more cherry-picks
> >>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
> initial
> >>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
> >> components
> >>>>>> and tests for them,
> >>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without changes
> >> in
> >>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in the
> >> scope?
> >>>>>> If you don't,
> >>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
> >> myself, I
> >>>>>> guess it would be
> >>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> >>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> >>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> >>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in IGNITE-12683
> >> [1][2].
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]
> >:
> >>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
> BPlusTree
> >>>>>>> [1], [2]
> >>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> >>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> [hidden email]
> >>> :
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch
> that
> >>>>>>> contain
> >>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
> >> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> fix
> >>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP
> >>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> >>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> >>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
> related
> >>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on node
> >> start.
> >>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
> >> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> fix
> >>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> >> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> >> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
> >> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
> >>>>>>> probably ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you
> ok
> >>>>>>> with it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1
> >>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must
> be
> >>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> >>>>>>> partition -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
> >>>>>>> contribution
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
> log
> >>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >> memory
> >>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
> >> with
> >>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> metastorage.
> >>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
> with
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >> exception
> >>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> >>>>>>> shutdown on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> >> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> >> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >> generation for
> >>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
> >> PME can
> >>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >> topology
> >>>>>>>>>> caused by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> >> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> value
> >>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number
> of
> >>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
> >> policy
> >>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> >> type in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >> historical
> >>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization
> >> of
> >>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> last
> >>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545
> >>>>>>> Introduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition map
> >>>>>>> exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> issues
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> cache
> >>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> when
> >>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479
> >> Make
> >>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
> >>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> WAL
> >>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
> on
> >> near
> >>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
> >> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> >> join. -
> >>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227 Fix
> >>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
> is
> >>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
> >> and
> >>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
> >>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> >>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of commits
> to
> >>>>>>>>>> transfer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from Mira
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> >> upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
> >> dirty
> >>>>>>> python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>
> >> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> >> configuration
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
> log
> >>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >> memory
> >>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
> >> with
> >>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage.
> >>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must
> be
> >>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >> exception -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> >> partition
> >>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> >> shutdown
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> >> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
> >> (#7495)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation in
> >> CLI
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>> REST.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> >> (#7474)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
> >> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> MERGE
> >>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> generation
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
> PME
> >> can
> >>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> topology
> >>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >> MapResult
> >>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> >> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> value
> >>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number
> of
> >>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
> >> policy
> >>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> type
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >> historical
> >>>>>>> one -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization
> of
> >>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
> >>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> cache
> >>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> when
> >>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
> >>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
> >>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on
> >> near
> >>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
> >> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> >> join. -
> >>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
> >>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
> >> and
> >>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
> >>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> >> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
> started
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
> >> cache
> >>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor
> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> >>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
> properties
> >> -
> >>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
> lower-case
> >>>>>>>>>> statements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't show
> >>>>>>> histogram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
> >> character
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> >>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
> available
> >>>>>>> then and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the
> >> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets for
> >>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for 2.8.1
> to
> >>>>>>>>>> master, do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
> yourself
> >> or
> >>>>>>>>>> should I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
> >> suppose
> >>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
> >> current
> >>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who is
> a
> >>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1] who
> >> is a
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should
> not
> >> we
> >>>>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread
> to
> >>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
> >> bug-fixes
> >>>>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can cause
> >> node
> >>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
> >>>>>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
> >>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop properly
> on
> >>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents
> >> main()
> >>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for checkpoint
> >> read
> >>>>>>>>>> lock,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This fix
> >>>>>>> brings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a large
> >>>>>>> number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
> >> 2.8.0
> >>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker
> >> issues
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think we
> >>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule the
> >> next
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
> >> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay Izhikov
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits
> for
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
> >> release
> >>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the release
> >> and
> >>>>>>>>>> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
> >> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native
> >>>>>>>>>> persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release
> >> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
> >> these 2
> >>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>> PRs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
> >>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release
> >>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
> >>>>>>> committers,
> >>>>>>>>>> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we
> can
> >>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
> >> time,
> >>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard
> >> under
> >>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the
> >> release
> >>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
> >> Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related
> >> to SQL
> >>>>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8
> >>>>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> >> thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue,
> >> e.g.
> >>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries
> >> from
> >>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we
> >>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is
> >> the
> >>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
> >> schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
> >> anybody
> >>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey
> >>>>>>> Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>> Transaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
> ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
> >>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch
> >> under
> >>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey
> >>>>>>> Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits
> >> to
> >>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
> >> opinion
> >>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are
> >> ready
> >>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long
> as
> >>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your
> >>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> >>>>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
> >> failing
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's
> >>>>>>> states can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
> unstable
> >>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on
> >>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
> >> rebalance
> >>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
> >> cluster and
> >>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting
> wal
> >>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead
> >> of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
> >> version
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException
> is
> >>>>>>> thrown
> >>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache
> >> which
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
> illegal
> >>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized
> >> enum
> >>>>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find
> >> the
> >>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
> >> record
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
> >> during
> >>>>>>>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
> >> owned by
> >>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on
> >> node
> >>>>>>>>>> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> >>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between
> >> cache
> >>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
> difference
> >>>>>>> output
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated
> >>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by
> >>>>>>>>>> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Taras Ledkov
> >>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

[Denis Garus]

Nikolay,
could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?

1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983

чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>:

> Nikolay,
>
> TC results: [1], [2]
> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
>
> [1]:
>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> [2]:
>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>
> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>
> > Hello, Alex.
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > > 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
> > написал(а):
> > >
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> > > cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> > > IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for cache
> > > with indexed types
> > > IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and entry
> > > expiration when persistent is enabled
> > > Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
> already
> > > merged to master.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> > >
> > >> Taras.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you, very much!
> > >> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
> > >>
> > >> Igniters,
> > >>
> > >> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
> > >>
> > >> OPEN:
> > >>
> > >> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error on
> > >> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> > >> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
> > >> Pavel Tupitsyn
> > >>
> > >> IN PROGRESS:
> > >>
> > >> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on really
> > >> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> > >> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
> state
> > >> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
> > >>
> > >> PATCH AVAILABLE:
> > >>
> > >> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
> > >> Voronkin
> > >> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
> YuJue
> > Li
> > >> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
> > handled
> > >> - Nikolai Kulagin
> > >> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
> > >> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> > >> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
> > checkpoint
> > >> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> > >> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected
> row
> > >> key - Denis Mekhanikov
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
> > >> написал(а):
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets to
> > >> port into 2.8.1:
> > >>>
> > >>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
> > >> disable SQL functions.
> > >>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
> while
> > >> traversing index tree.
> > >>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> > >>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read
> to
> > >> unlock the GridH2Table.
> > >>>
> > >>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> > >>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> > >>> [2].
> > >>
> >
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> > >>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> > >> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
> > >> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already in
> > the
> > >> cluster from newly joined ones.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Mikhail.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> > >>>>> Hello, Ivan.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
> > >>>>> Please, go ahead.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
> > >> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Igniters,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that
> we
> > >> need 3
> > >>>>>> more cherry-picks
> > >>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
> > initial
> > >>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
> > >> components
> > >>>>>> and tests for them,
> > >>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
> changes
> > >> in
> > >>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> > >>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in
> the
> > >> scope?
> > >>>>>> If you don't,
> > >>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
> > >> myself, I
> > >>>>>> guess it would be
> > >>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> > >>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> > >>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> > >>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
> IGNITE-12683
> > >> [1][2].
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> > >>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
> [hidden email]
> > >:
> > >>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
> > BPlusTree
> > >>>>>>> [1], [2]
> > >>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> > >>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
> 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> > >>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]
> >
> > >>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
> > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch
> > that
> > >>>>>>> contain
> > >>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
> > >> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> > >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> > fix
> > >>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> improvements?
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP
> > >>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> > >>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> > >>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
> > related
> > >>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
> node
> > >> start.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> TcpCommunication
> > >> SPI
> > >>>>>>>>>> metrics
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> > >> probably.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> > >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> > fix
> > >>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> improvements?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> > >> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> TcpCommunication
> > >> SPI
> > >>>>>>>>>> metrics
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> > >> probably.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
> > >>>>>>> probably ask
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you
> > ok
> > >>>>>>> with it?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> INSERT
> > >>>>>>> (#7649)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> must
> > be
> > >>>>>>> closed
> > >>>>>>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> > >>>>>>> partition -
> > >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> > >>>>>>> improvement
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
> > >>>>>>> contribution
> > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
> > log
> > >>>>>>> method
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> > >>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> > >> memory
> > >>>>>>>>>> restore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> registration
> > >> with
> > >>>>>>>>>> failed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> > metastorage.
> > >>>>>>> (#7606)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
> > with
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> > >>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> > >> exception
> > >>>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> > >>>>>>> shutdown on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> > >> #7522.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> > >>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> Fixes
> > >>>>>>> #7469.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> > >> MERGE
> > >>>>>>>>>> command
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> > >> generation for
> > >>>>>>>>>> system
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
> > >> PME can
> > >>>>>>>>>> prevent
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> > >> topology
> > >>>>>>>>>> caused by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> > >> MapResult
> > >>>>>>>>>> close.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> > >> Data. -
> > >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> > value
> > >>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number
> > of
> > >>>>>>> eviction
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> eviction
> > >> policy
> > >>>>>>>>>> cause
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> > >> type in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> > >>>>>>> NullPointerException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> #7366.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> > >> historical
> > >>>>>>> one
> > >>>>>>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> deserialization
> > >> of
> > >>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> > last
> > >>>>>>> server
> > >>>>>>>>>> event
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545
> > >>>>>>> Introduce
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition
> map
> > >>>>>>> exchange
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> > issues
> > >> for
> > >>>>>>>>>> atomic
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> > cache
> > >>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> > when
> > >>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> > >>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479
> > >> Make
> > >>>>>>> binary
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
> by
> > >>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> > WAL
> > >>>>>>> doesn't
> > >>>>>>>>>> work
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
> > on
> > >> near
> > >>>>>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> other
> > >> nodes
> > >>>>>>>>>> switch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> > >> join. -
> > >>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227
> Fix
> > >>>>>>> failed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
> > is
> > >>>>>>> evicted
> > >>>>>>>>>> then
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> data
> > >> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> indexes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> dumps
> > >>>>>>>>>> generation on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> > >>>>>>> optimized.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
> commits
> > to
> > >>>>>>>>>> transfer
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
> > results.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from
> Mira
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> > >> upstream-http/master
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
> > >> dirty
> > >>>>>>> python
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    if not line.startswith('-'):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        ticket = line[:-1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        tickets.add(ticket)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        founded[ticket] = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    for ticket in tickets:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        if ticket in commit_msg:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            print(commit_msg)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            founded[ticket] += 1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> > >> configuration
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
> > log
> > >>>>>>> method
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> > >>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> > >> (#7649)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> > >> memory
> > >>>>>>>>>> restore
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
> > >> with
> > >>>>>>> failed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> metastorage.
> > >>>>>>> (#7606)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
> with
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> > >>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must
> > be
> > >>>>>>> closed
> > >>>>>>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> > >> exception -
> > >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> > >> partition
> > >>>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> > >> shutdown
> > >>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> > >> #7522.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
> > >> (#7495)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> > >>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation
> in
> > >> CLI
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> REST.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> > >> improvement
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> > >> (#7474)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> Fixes
> > >> #7469.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> > MERGE
> > >>>>>>> command
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> > generation
> > >> for
> > >>>>>>>>>> system
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
> > PME
> > >> can
> > >>>>>>>>>> prevent
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> > topology
> > >>>>>>> caused
> > >>>>>>>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> > >> MapResult
> > >>>>>>> close.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> > >> Data. -
> > >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> > value
> > >>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number
> > of
> > >>>>>>> eviction
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
> > >> policy
> > >>>>>>>>>> cause
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> > type
> > >> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> > >>>>>>> NullPointerException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> #7366.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> > >> historical
> > >>>>>>> one -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> deserialization
> > of
> > >>>>>>> arrays,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> last
> > >>>>>>> server
> > >>>>>>>>>> event
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> issues
> > >> for
> > >>>>>>>>>> atomic
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> > cache
> > >>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> > when
> > >>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> > >>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
> by
> > >>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> WAL
> > >>>>>>> doesn't
> > >>>>>>>>>> work
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
> on
> > >> near
> > >>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> other
> > >> nodes
> > >>>>>>>>>> switch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> > >> join. -
> > >>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
> is
> > >>>>>>> evicted
> > >>>>>>>>>> then
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> data
> > >> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> indexes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> dumps
> > >>>>>>>>>> generation on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> > >> optimized.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
> > started
> > >> in
> > >>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
> > >> cache
> > >>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor
> > after
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> > >>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
> > properties
> > >> -
> > >>>>>>> Fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
> > lower-case
> > >>>>>>>>>> statements
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
> show
> > >>>>>>> histogram
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
> > >> character
> > >>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> > >>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
> > available
> > >>>>>>> then and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the
> > >> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets
> for
> > >>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
> 2.8.1
> > to
> > >>>>>>>>>> master, do
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
> > yourself
> > >> or
> > >>>>>>>>>> should I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
> > >> suppose
> > >>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
> > >> current
> > >>>>>>> thread
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who
> is
> > a
> > >>>>>>> manager
> > >>>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1]
> who
> > >> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> > release:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> > >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> > release:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should
> > not
> > >> we
> > >>>>>>>>>> reflect
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread
> > to
> > >>>>>>> 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>> scope
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
> > >> bug-fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>> too,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
> cause
> > >> node
> > >>>>>>>>>> failure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
> > >>>>>>>>>> deserialization
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
> > >>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
> properly
> > on
> > >>>>>>> client
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents
> > >> main()
> > >>>>>>>>>> method
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
> checkpoint
> > >> read
> > >>>>>>>>>> lock,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This
> fix
> > >>>>>>> brings
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
> large
> > >>>>>>> number of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
> > >> 2.8.0
> > >>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>> all
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov
> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker
> > >> issues
> > >>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think
> we
> > >>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule
> the
> > >> next
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
> > >> releases.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
> Izhikov
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release
> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits
> > for
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> tickets
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
> > >> release
> > >>>>>>>>>> branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
> release
> > >> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> exclude
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
> > >> blocker
> > >>>>>>>>>> issues.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
> Коптилин <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> > >>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
> native
> > >>>>>>>>>> persistence
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
> Kasnacheev
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
> Maitra
> > <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release
> > >> 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>> branch
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
> > >> these 2
> > >>>>>>> open
> > >>>>>>>>>> PRs
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
> > >>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
> release
> > >>>>>>> manager
> > >>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
> > >>>>>>> committers,
> > >>>>>>>>>> PMCs
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we
> > can
> > >>>>>>> close
> > >>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
> > >> time,
> > >>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>> you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
> guard
> > >> under
> > >>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the
> > >> release
> > >>>>>>>>>> branch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
> > >> Ledkov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
> related
> > >> to SQL
> > >>>>>>>>>> query
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite
> 2.8
> > >>>>>>> contains
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> > >> thread-safe.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
> issue,
> > >> e.g.
> > >>>>>>> JDBC
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
> queries
> > >> from
> > >>>>>>> JDBC
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and
> we
> > >>>>>>> already
> > >>>>>>>>>> keep
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle
> on
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This
> is
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>> time
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
> > >> schedule:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
> > >> anybody
> > >>>>>>> who
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
> Sergey
> > >>>>>>> Antonov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774
> > >>>>>>> Transaction
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
> > ignite-2.8.1
> > >>>>>>> scope.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
> > >>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch
> > >> under
> > >>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
> Alexey
> > >>>>>>> Goncharuk
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
> commits
> > >> to
> > >>>>>>> master
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
> > >> opinion
> > >>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are
> > >> ready
> > >>>>>>> end
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long
> > as
> > >>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share
> your
> > >>>>>>> opinion
> > >>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> > >>>>>>> refactoring
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
> > >> failing
> > >>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
> partition's
> > >>>>>>> states can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
> > unstable
> > >>>>>>> topology
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race
> on
> > >>>>>>> MapResult
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
> > >> rebalance
> > >>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
> > >> cluster and
> > >>>>>>>>>> then
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
> rentingFutures
> > >> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
> > eviction
> > >>>>>>>>>> callbacks
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting
> > wal
> > >>>>>>> record
> > >>>>>>>>>> type
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
> instead
> > >> of a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
> > >> version
> > >>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>> last
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException
> > is
> > >>>>>>> thrown
> > >>>>>>>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
> issues
> > >> for
> > >>>>>>>>>> atomic
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache
> > >> which
> > >>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>> not
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
> > illegal
> > >>>>>>> state
> > >>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized
> > >> enum
> > >>>>>>> to a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
> find
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
> > >> record
> > >>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>> WAL
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
> > >> during
> > >>>>>>>>>> recovery
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
> > >> owned by
> > >>>>>>>>>> other
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference
> on
> > >> node
> > >>>>>>>>>> join.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if
> a
> > >>>>>>> partition
> > >>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
> between
> > >> cache
> > >>>>>>> data
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
> > difference
> > >>>>>>> output
> > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
> generated
> > >>>>>>> thread
> > >>>>>>>>>> dumps
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges
> by
> > >>>>>>>>>> expiration:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> > >>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> > >>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> > >>>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Taras Ledkov
> > >>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

[Nikolay Izhikov-2]

Done.

> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>
> Nikolay,
> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
>
> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Nikolay,
>>
>> TC results: [1], [2]
>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
>>
>> [1]:
>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>> [2]:
>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>
>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Hello, Alex.
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
>>> написал(а):
>>>>
>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>
>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for cache
>>>> with indexed types
>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and entry
>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
>> already
>>>> merged to master.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Taras.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, very much!
>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>
>>>>> OPEN:
>>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error on
>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
>>>>>
>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
>>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on really
>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
>> state
>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>>>>>
>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
>>>>> Voronkin
>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
>> YuJue
>>> Li
>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
>>> handled
>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
>>> checkpoint
>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected
>> row
>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets to
>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
>>>>> disable SQL functions.
>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
>> while
>>>>> traversing index tree.
>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read
>> to
>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
>>>>>> [2].
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already in
>>> the
>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that
>> we
>>>>> need 3
>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
>>> initial
>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
>>>>> components
>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
>> changes
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in
>> the
>>>>> scope?
>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
>>>>> myself, I
>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
>> IGNITE-12683
>>>>> [1][2].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
>> [hidden email]
>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
>>> BPlusTree
>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch
>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
>> node
>>>>> start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>> TcpCommunication
>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>> TcpCommunication
>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you
>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>> INSERT
>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
>> must
>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>>>>>>> partition -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
>>>>>>>>>> contribution
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
>>> log
>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>> registration
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
>>> with
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>>>>> exception
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>> generation for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
>>>>> PME can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
>>> value
>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number
>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>> eviction
>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>>>>> type in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>> deserialization
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
>>> last
>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545
>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition
>> map
>>>>>>>>>> exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>>> issues
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479
>>>>> Make
>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
>>> on
>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>> other
>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227
>> Fix
>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
>> data
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
>> commits
>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
>>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from
>> Mira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
>>>>> upstream-http/master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
>>>>> dirty
>>>>>>>>>> python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   if not line.startswith('-'):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       ticket = line[:-1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       tickets.add(ticket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       founded[ticket] = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   for ticket in tickets:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       if ticket in commit_msg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           print(commit_msg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           founded[ticket] += 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
>>> log
>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
>> with
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must
>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>>>>> exception -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>> shutdown
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
>>>>> (#7495)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation
>> in
>>>>> CLI
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
>>>>> (#7474)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>> Fixes
>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>> generation
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
>>> PME
>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
>>> value
>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number
>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>>> type
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>> one -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>> deserialization
>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
>> last
>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>> issues
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
>> on
>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>> other
>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
>> is
>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
>> data
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
>>> started
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor
>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
>>> properties
>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
>>> lower-case
>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
>> show
>>>>>>>>>> histogram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
>>>>> character
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
>>> available
>>>>>>>>>> then and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
>> 2.8.1
>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
>>> yourself
>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
>>>>> suppose
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who
>> is
>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1]
>> who
>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin
>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should
>>> not
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread
>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
>>>>> bug-fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
>> cause
>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
>> properly
>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents
>>>>> main()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
>> checkpoint
>>>>> read
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This
>> fix
>>>>>>>>>> brings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
>> large
>>>>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
>>>>> 2.8.0
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov
>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker
>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think
>> we
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule
>> the
>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
>> Izhikov
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release
>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits
>>> for
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
>> release
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
>> Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
>> Kasnacheev
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
>> Maitra
>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release
>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
>>>>> these 2
>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
>> release
>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
>>>>>>>>>> committers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we
>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
>> guard
>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
>>>>> Ledkov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
>> related
>>>>> to SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite
>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
>>>>> thread-safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
>> issue,
>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
>> queries
>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and
>> we
>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle
>> on
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This
>> is
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
>>>>> schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
>> Sergey
>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
>>> ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch
>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
>> Alexey
>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
>> commits
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are
>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long
>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share
>> your
>>>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
>>>>> failing
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
>> partition's
>>>>>>>>>> states can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
>>> unstable
>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race
>> on
>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
>>>>> cluster and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
>> rentingFutures
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting
>>> wal
>>>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
>> instead
>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException
>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
>> issues
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache
>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
>>> illegal
>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized
>>>>> enum
>>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
>> find
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
>>>>> owned by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference
>> on
>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if
>> a
>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
>> between
>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
>>> difference
>>>>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
>> generated
>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges
>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

[Юрий]

Nikolay,

Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is not
actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?

[1]. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1

чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:

> Done.
>
>
> > 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]> написал(а):
> >
> > Nikolay,
> > could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
> >
> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
> >
> > чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> Nikolay,
> >>
> >> TC results: [1], [2]
> >> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
> >>
> >> [1]:
> >>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >> [2]:
> >>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>
> >> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >>
> >>> Hello, Alex.
> >>>
> >>> +1 from me.
> >>>
> >>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
> >>> написал(а):
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> >>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> >>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
> cache
> >>>> with indexed types
> >>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
> entry
> >>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
> >>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
> >> already
> >>>> merged to master.
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT?
> >>>>
> >>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Taras.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you, very much!
> >>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OPEN:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error
> on
> >>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> >>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
> >>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IN PROGRESS:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
> really
> >>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> >>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
> >> state
> >>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
> >>>>> Voronkin
> >>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
> >> YuJue
> >>> Li
> >>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
> >>> handled
> >>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
> >>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
> >>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> >>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
> >>> checkpoint
> >>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> >>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected
> >> row
> >>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets
> to
> >>>>> port into 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
> >>>>> disable SQL functions.
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
> >> while
> >>>>> traversing index tree.
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read
> >> to
> >>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> >>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> >>>>>> [2].
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> >>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
> >>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already
> in
> >>> the
> >>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Mikhail.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
> >>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that
> >> we
> >>>>> need 3
> >>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
> >>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
> >>> initial
> >>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
> >>>>> components
> >>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
> >>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
> >> changes
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in
> >> the
> >>>>> scope?
> >>>>>>>>> If you don't,
> >>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
> >>>>> myself, I
> >>>>>>>>> guess it would be
> >>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> >>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> >>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> >>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> >>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> >>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]
> >:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
> >> IGNITE-12683
> >>>>> [1][2].
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >> [hidden email]
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
> >>> BPlusTree
> >>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
> >> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
> [hidden email]
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch
> >>> that
> >>>>>>>>>> contain
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> >>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with
> TCP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> >>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
> >>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
> >> node
> >>>>> start.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >> TcpCommunication
> >>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
> >>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >> TcpCommunication
> >>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
> >>>>>>>>>> probably ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are
> you
> >>> ok
> >>>>>>>>>> with it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >> INSERT
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> >> must
> >>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> >>>>>>>>>> partition -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
> >>>>>>>>>> contribution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
> uses
> >>> log
> >>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >> registration
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
> >>> with
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >>>>> exception
> >>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> >>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> >>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>> generation for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> during
> >>>>> PME can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> Spring
> >>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> >>> value
> >>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> number
> >>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >> eviction
> >>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> >>>>> type in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >> deserialization
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> >>> last
> >>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
> IGNITE-12545
> >>>>>>>>>> Introduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition
> >> map
> >>>>>>>>>> exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >>> issues
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
> IGNITE-12479
> >>>>> Make
> >>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> >>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> recovery
> >>> on
> >>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >> other
> >>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> >>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227
> >> Fix
> >>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> partition
> >>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> >> data
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> >>>>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
> >> commits
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
> >>> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from
> >> Mira
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> >>>>> upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
> >>>>> dirty
> >>>>>>>>>> python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> >>>>> configuration
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
> >>> log
> >>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> INSERT
> >>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> registration
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
> >> with
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> must
> >>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >>>>> exception -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
> >>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
> >>>>> shutdown
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
> >>>>> (#7495)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation
> >> in
> >>>>> CLI
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> >>>>> (#7474)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
> >>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>> generation
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
> >>> PME
> >>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
> >>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
> >>> value
> >>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> number
> >>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> eviction
> >>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> >>> type
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>> one -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >> deserialization
> >>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> >> last
> >>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >> issues
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> >> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
> >> on
> >>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >> other
> >>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
> >>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
> >> is
> >>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> >> data
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
> >>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
> >>> started
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
> >>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor
> >>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> >>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
> >>> properties
> >>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
> >>> lower-case
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
> >> show
> >>>>>>>>>> histogram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
> >>>>> character
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> >>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
> >>> available
> >>>>>>>>>> then and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to
> the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
> >> 2.8.1
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
> >>> yourself
> >>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
> >>>>> suppose
> >>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
> >>>>> current
> >>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who
> >> is
> >>> a
> >>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1]
> >> who
> >>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin
> >> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should
> >>> not
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
> thread
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
> >>>>> bug-fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
> >> cause
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
> >>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
> >> properly
> >>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
> prevents
> >>>>> main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
> >> checkpoint
> >>>>> read
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This
> >> fix
> >>>>>>>>>> brings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
> >> large
> >>>>>>>>>> number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
> >>>>> 2.8.0
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov
> >> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
> blocker
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think
> >> we
> >>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule
> >> the
> >>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
> >>>>> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
> >> Izhikov
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release
> >> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits
> >>> for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
> >> release
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
> >> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
> >>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
> >> Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
> >> native
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
> >> Kasnacheev
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
> >> Maitra
> >>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
> release
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
> >>>>> these 2
> >>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
> >> release
> >>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
> >>>>>>>>>> committers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think
> we
> >>> can
> >>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
> >>>>> time,
> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
> >> guard
> >>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for
> the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
> >>>>> Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
> >> related
> >>>>> to SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite
> >> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> >>>>> thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
> >> issue,
> >>>>> e.g.
> >>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
> cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
> >> queries
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and
> >> we
> >>>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle
> >> on
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This
> >> is
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
> >>>>> schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
> >>>>> anybody
> >>>>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
> >> Sergey
> >>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
> IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>> Transaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
> >>> ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
> branch
> >>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
> >> Alexey
> >>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
> >> commits
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
> >>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they
> are
> >>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as
> long
> >>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share
> >> your
> >>>>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> >>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
> >>>>> failing
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
> >> partition's
> >>>>>>>>>> states can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
> >>> unstable
> >>>>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race
> >> on
> >>>>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
> >>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
> >>>>> cluster and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
> >> rentingFutures
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
> >>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting
> >>> wal
> >>>>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
> enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
> >> instead
> >>>>> of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
> >>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
> NullPointerException
> >>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> thrown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
> >> issues
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
> cache
> >>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
> >>> illegal
> >>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
> serialized
> >>>>> enum
> >>>>>>>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
> >> find
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
> checkpoint
> >>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
> >>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
> >>>>> owned by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference
> >> on
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if
> >> a
> >>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
> >> between
> >>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
> >>> difference
> >>>>>>>>>> output
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
> >> generated
> >>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

--
Живи с улыбкой! :D

[Nikolay Izhikov-2]

Hello, Jury.

It seems we reached code freeze step for 2.8.1 release.
I will prepare rc for it shortly.

> 14 мая 2020 г., в 11:08, Юрий <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>
> Nikolay,
>
> Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is not
> actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?
>
> [1]. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>
> чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Done.
>>
>>
>>> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Nikolay,
>>> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
>>>
>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
>>>
>>> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>
>>>> TC results: [1], [2]
>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>> [2]:
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>
>>>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello, Alex.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
>>>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
>>>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
>> cache
>>>>>> with indexed types
>>>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
>> entry
>>>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
>>>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
>>>> already
>>>>>> merged to master.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Taras.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you, very much!
>>>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OPEN:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error
>> on
>>>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
>> really
>>>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
>>>> state
>>>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
>>>>>>> Voronkin
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
>>>> YuJue
>>>>> Li
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
>>>>> handled
>>>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
>>>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected
>>>> row
>>>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets
>> to
>>>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
>>>>>>> disable SQL functions.
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
>>>> while
>>>>>>> traversing index tree.
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read
>>>> to
>>>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
>>>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
>>>>>>>> [2].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
>>>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
>>>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already
>> in
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
>>>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that
>>>> we
>>>>>>> need 3
>>>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
>>>>> initial
>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
>>>>>>> components
>>>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
>>>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
>>>> changes
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in
>>>> the
>>>>>>> scope?
>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
>>>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
>>>>>>> myself, I
>>>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
>>>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]
>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
>>>> IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>> [1][2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
>>>>> BPlusTree
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with
>> TCP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
>>>> node
>>>>>>> start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
>>>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are
>> you
>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>>>> INSERT
>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
>>>> must
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>> partition -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
>> uses
>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
>> when
>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>>>> registration
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
>>>>> with
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>>>>>>> exception
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>>>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>>>> generation for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
>> during
>>>>>>> PME can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
>> Spring
>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>> number
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>>>> eviction
>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>>>>>>> type in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
>> IGNITE-12545
>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition
>>>> map
>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
>> IGNITE-12479
>>>>>>> Make
>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
>> recovery
>>>>> on
>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>>>> other
>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227
>>>> Fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>> partition
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
>>>> data
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
>>>> commits
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
>>>>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from
>>>> Mira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
>>>>>>> upstream-http/master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
>>>>>>> dirty
>>>>>>>>>>>> python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  if not line.startswith('-'):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      ticket = line[:-1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      tickets.add(ticket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      founded[ticket] = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  for ticket in tickets:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      if ticket in commit_msg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          print(commit_msg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          founded[ticket] += 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>> INSERT
>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>> registration
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
>>>> with
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
>> must
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>>>>>>> exception -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>>>> shutdown
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
>>>>>>> (#7495)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation
>>>> in
>>>>>>> CLI
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
>>>>>>> (#7474)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>> generation
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
>>>>> PME
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>> number
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>> eviction
>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>>>>> type
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>> one -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>> deserialization
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>>>> issues
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
>>>> on
>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>>>> other
>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
>>>> data
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
>>>>> started
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor
>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
>>>>> properties
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
>>>>> lower-case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
>>>> show
>>>>>>>>>>>> histogram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
>>>>>>> character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>>>> then and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to
>> the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets
>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
>>>>>>> suppose
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who
>>>> is
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1]
>>>> who
>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should
>>>>> not
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
>> thread
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
>>>>>>> bug-fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
>>>> cause
>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
>>>> properly
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
>> prevents
>>>>>>> main()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This
>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> brings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
>>>>>>> 2.8.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
>> blocker
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think
>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule
>>>> the
>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
>>>> Izhikov
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release
>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
>>>> release
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
>>>> Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
>>>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
>>>> Kasnacheev
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
>>>> Maitra
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
>> release
>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
>>>>>>> these 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
>>>>>>>>>>>> committers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think
>> we
>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
>>>> guard
>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for
>> the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
>>>>>>> Ledkov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
>>>> related
>>>>>>> to SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite
>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
>>>>>>> thread-safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
>>>> issue,
>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
>> cache,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
>>>> queries
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and
>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle
>>>> on
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This
>>>> is
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
>>>>>>> schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
>>>> Sergey
>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
>> IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
>>>>> ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
>> branch
>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
>>>> Alexey
>>>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
>>>> commits
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they
>> are
>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as
>> long
>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share
>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
>>>>>>> failing
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
>>>> partition's
>>>>>>>>>>>> states can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
>>>>> unstable
>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race
>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
>>>>>>> cluster and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
>>>> rentingFutures
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting
>>>>> wal
>>>>>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
>> enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
>>>> instead
>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
>> NullPointerException
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
>>>> issues
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
>> cache
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
>>>>> illegal
>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
>> serialized
>>>>>>> enum
>>>>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
>>>> find
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
>> checkpoint
>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
>>>>>>> owned by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference
>>>> on
>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
>>>> between
>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
>>>>> difference
>>>>>>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
>>>> generated
>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges
>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Живи с улыбкой! :D

[Nikolay Izhikov-2]

Hello, Igniters.

I prepared a PR with release notes.
Please, take a look [1]

[1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7821

> 20 мая 2020 г., в 13:06, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>
> Hello, Jury.
>
> It seems we reached code freeze step for 2.8.1 release.
> I will prepare rc for it shortly.
>
>> 14 мая 2020 г., в 11:08, Юрий <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>>
>> Nikolay,
>>
>> Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is not
>> actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?
>>
>> [1]. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>
>> чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Done.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>>>>
>>>> Nikolay,
>>>> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
>>>>
>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
>>>>
>>>> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>
>>>>> TC results: [1], [2]
>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>
>>>>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello, Alex.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
>>>>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
>>> cache
>>>>>>> with indexed types
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
>>> entry
>>>>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
>>>>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
>>>>> already
>>>>>>> merged to master.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Taras.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you, very much!
>>>>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OPEN:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error
>>> on
>>>>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
>>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
>>> really
>>>>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
>>>>> state
>>>>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
>>>>>>>> Voronkin
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
>>>>> YuJue
>>>>>> Li
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
>>>>>> handled
>>>>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
>>>>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
>>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected
>>>>> row
>>>>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets
>>> to
>>>>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
>>>>>>>> disable SQL functions.
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
>>>>> while
>>>>>>>> traversing index tree.
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
>>>>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
>>>>>>>>> [2].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
>>>>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
>>>>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already
>>> in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
>>>>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> need 3
>>>>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
>>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
>>>>>> initial
>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
>>>>>>>> components
>>>>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
>>>>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> scope?
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
>>>>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
>>>>>>>> myself, I
>>>>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
>>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <[hidden email]
>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
>>>>> IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>> [1][2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
>>>>>> BPlusTree
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with
>>> TCP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
>>>>> node
>>>>>>>> start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are
>>> you
>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>>>>> INSERT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
>>>>> must
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
>>> uses
>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
>>> when
>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>>>>>>>> exception
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>>>>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>>>>> generation for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
>>> during
>>>>>>>> PME can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
>>> Spring
>>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>>> number
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>>>>>>>> type in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
>>> IGNITE-12545
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition
>>>>> map
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
>>> IGNITE-12479
>>>>>>>> Make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
>>> recovery
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227
>>>>> Fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>>> partition
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
>>>>> data
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
>>>>> commits
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
>>>>>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from
>>>>> Mira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
>>>>>>>> upstream-http/master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
>>>>>>>> dirty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if not line.startswith('-'):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     ticket = line[:-1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     tickets.add(ticket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     founded[ticket] = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in tickets:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     if ticket in commit_msg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         print(commit_msg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         founded[ticket] += 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses
>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>>> INSERT
>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>>> registration
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
>>> must
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>>>>>>>> exception -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>>>>> shutdown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
>>>>>>>> (#7495)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> CLI
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
>>>>>>>> (#7474)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>>> generation
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
>>>>>> PME
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter
>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>>> number
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>>> eviction
>>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during
>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
>>>>> data
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor
>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
>>>>>> properties
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
>>>>>> lower-case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
>>>>> show
>>>>>>>>>>>>> histogram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
>>>>>>>> character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to
>>> the
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
>>>>>>>> suppose
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who
>>>>> is
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1]
>>>>> who
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should
>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
>>> thread
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
>>>>>>>> bug-fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
>>>>> properly
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
>>> prevents
>>>>>>>> main()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This
>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>> brings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
>>>>>>>> 2.8.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov
>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
>>> blocker
>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
>>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
>>>>> Izhikov
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release
>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
>>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
>>>>> Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
>>>>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
>>>>> Kasnacheev
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
>>>>> Maitra
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
>>> release
>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
>>>>>>>> these 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think
>>> we
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
>>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
>>>>> guard
>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for
>>> the
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
>>>>>>>> Ledkov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
>>>>> related
>>>>>>>> to SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite
>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
>>>>>>>> thread-safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
>>>>> issue,
>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
>>> cache,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
>>>>> queries
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
>>>>>>>> schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
>>>>> Sergey
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
>>> IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
>>> branch
>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
>>>>> Alexey
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
>>>>> commits
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they
>>> are
>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as
>>> long
>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share
>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
>>>>>>>> failing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
>>>>> partition's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> states can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
>>>>>> unstable
>>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
>>>>>>>> cluster and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
>>>>> rentingFutures
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting
>>>>>> wal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
>>> enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
>>>>> instead
>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
>>> cache
>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
>>>>>> illegal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
>>> serialized
>>>>>>>> enum
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
>>>>> find
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
>>>>>>>> owned by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
>>>>> between
>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
>>>>>> difference
>>>>>>>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
>>>>> generated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges
>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Живи с улыбкой! :D
>

[Ilya Kasnacheev]

Hello!

Do you mind if I push additional change to fix English in some of these
entries? A lot of these has times not concording with "fixed".

Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev


ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 15:47, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:

> Hello, Igniters.
>
> I prepared a PR with release notes.
> Please, take a look [1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7821
>
> > 20 мая 2020 г., в 13:06, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >
> > Hello, Jury.
> >
> > It seems we reached code freeze step for 2.8.1 release.
> > I will prepare rc for it shortly.
> >
> >> 14 мая 2020 г., в 11:08, Юрий <[hidden email]> написал(а):
> >>
> >> Nikolay,
> >>
> >> Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is not
> >> actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?
> >>
> >> [1].
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>
> >> чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >>
> >>> Done.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]> написал(а):
> >>>>
> >>>> Nikolay,
> >>>> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
> >>>>
> >>>> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> TC results: [1], [2]
> >>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello, Alex.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 from me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> >>>>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> >>>>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>> with indexed types
> >>>>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
> >>> entry
> >>>>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
> >>>>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
> >>>>> already
> >>>>>>> merged to master.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]
> >:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Taras.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you, very much!
> >>>>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> OPEN:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC
> error
> >>> on
> >>>>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform
> error:System.NullReferenceException -
> >>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
> >>> really
> >>>>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
> >>>>> state
> >>>>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. -
> Pavel
> >>>>>>>> Voronkin
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
> >>>>> YuJue
> >>>>>> Li
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
> >>>>>> handled
> >>>>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
> >>>>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
> >>>>>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error:
> Unexpected
> >>>>> row
> >>>>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related
> tickets
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability
> to
> >>>>>>>> disable SQL functions.
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
> >>>>> while
> >>>>>>>> traversing index tree.
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full
> read
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> >>>>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> >>>>>>>>> [2].
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> >>>>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was
> not
> >>>>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are
> already
> >>> in
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out
> that
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> need 3
> >>>>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
> >>>>>> initial
> >>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
> >>>>>>>> components
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
> >>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have
> any.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits
> in
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> scope?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
> >>>>>>>> myself, I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <
> [hidden email]
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
> >>>>> IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>> [1][2].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
> >>>>>> BPlusTree
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I
> mentioned:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1
> branch
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
> lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in
> bug
> >>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >>>>> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with
> >>> TCP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
> >>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
> >>>>> node
> >>>>>>>> start.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1
> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >>>>> TcpCommunication
> >>>>>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
> lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in
> bug
> >>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >>>>> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >>>>> TcpCommunication
> >>>>>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
> >>>>>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we
> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are
> >>> you
> >>>>>> ok
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
> >>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following
> commits:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >>>>> INSERT
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> >>>>> must
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> partition -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick
> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
> >>> uses
> >>>>>> log
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >>>>> registration
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>>>>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
> call
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open
> files"
> >>>>>>>> exception
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL
> expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
> Fixes
> >>>>>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
> the
> >>>>>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>>>>> generation for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> >>> during
> >>>>>>>> PME can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> >>> Spring
> >>>>>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
> counter
> >>>>>> value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> >>> number
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
> record
> >>>>>>>> type in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
> of
> >>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
> thrown
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> >>> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
> >>> IGNITE-12545
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to
> partition
> >>>>> map
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
> during
> >>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
> state
> >>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
> >>> IGNITE-12479
> >>>>>>>> Make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
> node
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
> record in
> >>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> >>> recovery
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >>>>> other
> >>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
> node
> >>>>>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a
> IGNITE-12227
> >>>>> Fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> >>> partition
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
> #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
> >>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between
> cache
> >>>>> data
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
> calculation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
> >>>>> commits
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
> >>>>>> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1
> from
> >>>>> Mira
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> >>>>>>>> upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with
> the
> >>>>>>>> dirty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv")
> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> >>>>>>>> configuration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
> uses
> >>>>>> log
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >>> INSERT
> >>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >>> registration
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>>>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
> call
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
> >>> must
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
> >>>>>>>> exception -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
> evicted
> >>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
> thread
> >>>>>>>> shutdown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
> Fixes
> >>>>>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view
> implemented.
> >>>>>>>> (#7495)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent
> deactivation
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> CLI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> >>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> refactoring
> >>>>>>>> (#7474)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
> >>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
> the
> >>>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>>> generation
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> during
> >>>>>> PME
> >>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
> >>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
> >>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> Spring
> >>>>>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
> counter
> >>>>>> value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> >>> number
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >>> eviction
> >>>>>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
> record
> >>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
> >>>>> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
> of
> >>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
> thrown
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> >>> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
> during
> >>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
> state
> >>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
> node
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record
> in
> >>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> recovery
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >>>>> other
> >>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
> node
> >>>>>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> partition
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
> #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
> >>>>> data
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
> >>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
> calculation
> >>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
> >>>>>> started
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on
> REPLICATED
> >>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField
> accessor
> >>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
> >>>>>> properties
> >>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
> >>>>>> lower-case
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
> >>>>> show
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> histogram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains
> underscore
> >>>>>>>> character
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
> >>>>>> available
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous
> tickets
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
> >>>>>> yourself
> >>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not
> it? I
> >>>>>>>> suppose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager
> (the
> >>>>>>>> current
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know
> who
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page
> [1]
> >>>>> who
> >>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
> >>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan
> Pavlukhin
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator.
> Should
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay
> Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
> >>> thread
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1
> following
> >>>>>>>> bug-fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
> >>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems
> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be
> used
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
> >>>>> properly
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
> >>> prevents
> >>>>>>>> main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
> >>>>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>> read
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]).
> This
> >>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> brings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
> >>>>> large
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments
> introduced in
> >>>>>>>> 2.8.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim
> Muzafarov
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
> >>> blocker
> >>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I
> think
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and
> schedule
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
> >>>>>>>> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
> >>>>> Izhikov
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1
> release
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all
> commits
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in
> corresponding
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only
> for a
> >>>>>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
> >>>>> Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
> >>>>> native
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
> >>>>> Kasnacheev
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
> >>>>> Maitra
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
> >>> release
> >>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to
> merge
> >>>>>>>> these 2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM
> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else
> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> committers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I
> think
> >>> we
> >>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and
> dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot
> that
> >>>>>>>> time,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
> >>>>> guard
> >>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48,
> Taras
> >>>>>>>> Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
> >>>>> related
> >>>>>>>> to SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and
> Ignite
> >>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> >>>>>>>> thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
> >>>>> issue,
> >>>>>>>> e.g.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
> >>> cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
> >>>>> queries
> >>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable
> and
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's
> settle
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager.
> This
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
> >>>>>>>> schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is
> there
> >>>>>>>> anybody
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
> >>>>> Sergey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
> >>> IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
> >>>>>> ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53,
> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
> >>> branch
> >>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
> >>>>> Alexey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
> >>>>> commits
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that
> in my
> >>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they
> >>> are
> >>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as
> >>> long
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please
> share
> >>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index
> creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO
> query is
> >>>>>>>> failing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
> >>>>> partition's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> states can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
> >>>>>> unstable
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential
> race
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
> >>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
> >>>>>>>> cluster and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
> >>>>> rentingFutures
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
> >>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect
> rewriting
> >>>>>> wal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
> >>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
> >>> enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
> >>>>> instead
> >>>>>>>> of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache
> for
> >>>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
> >>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
> >>> cache
> >>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
> >>>>>> illegal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
> >>> serialized
> >>>>>>>> enum
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
> >>>>> find
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
> >>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx
> desync
> >>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent
> partitions
> >>>>>>>> owned by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter
> difference
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition
> desync if
> >>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
> >>>>> between
> >>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
> >>>>>> difference
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> output
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
> >>>>> generated
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during
> purges
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Живи с улыбкой! :D
> >
>
>

[Nikolay Izhikov-2]

Hello, Ilya.

Actually, I’m uploading RC0 right now.
Let’s include these fixes in RC1, if you don’t mind?

> 21 мая 2020 г., в 16:00, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>
> Hello!
>
> Do you mind if I push additional change to fix English in some of these
> entries? A lot of these has times not concording with "fixed".
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 15:47, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hello, Igniters.
>>
>> I prepared a PR with release notes.
>> Please, take a look [1]
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7821
>>
>>> 20 мая 2020 г., в 13:06, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>
>> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Hello, Jury.
>>>
>>> It seems we reached code freeze step for 2.8.1 release.
>>> I will prepare rc for it shortly.
>>>
>>>> 14 мая 2020 г., в 11:08, Юрий <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>>>>
>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>
>>>> Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is not
>>>> actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?
>>>>
>>>> [1].
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>
>>>> чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Done.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
>>>>>>
>>>>>> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TC results: [1], [2]
>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello, Alex.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>> with indexed types
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
>>>>> entry
>>>>>>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
>>>>>>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>> merged to master.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]
>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Taras.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, very much!
>>>>>>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OPEN:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC
>> error
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform
>> error:System.NullReferenceException -
>>>>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready)
>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. -
>> Pavel
>>>>>>>>>> Voronkin
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command -
>>>>>>> YuJue
>>>>>>>> Li
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be
>>>>>>>> handled
>>>>>>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
>>>>>>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
>>>>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error:
>> Unexpected
>>>>>>> row
>>>>>>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related
>> tickets
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability
>> to
>>>>>>>>>> disable SQL functions.
>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values
>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>> traversing index tree.
>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full
>> read
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
>>>>>>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
>>>>>>>>>>> [2].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
>>>>>>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was
>> not
>>>>>>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are
>> already
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <
>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out
>> that
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> need 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my
>>>>>>>> initial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
>>>>>>>>>> components
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have
>> any.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits
>> in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> scope?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
>>>>>>>>>> myself, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>>>> [1][2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
>>>>>>>> BPlusTree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and
>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I
>> mentioned:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1
>> branch
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
>> lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in
>> bug
>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with
>>>>> TCP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics
>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on
>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>> start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1
>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
>> lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in
>> bug
>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>>>>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we
>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are
>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following
>> commits:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>>>>>>> INSERT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick
>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>>>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>>>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
>> call
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open
>> files"
>>>>>>>>>> exception
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL
>> expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>>>>>>> generation for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>> PME can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
>>>>> Spring
>>>>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
>> counter
>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>>>>> number
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
>> record
>>>>>>>>>> type in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
>> of
>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
>> thrown
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>>>>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
>>>>> IGNITE-12545
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to
>> partition
>>>>>>> map
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
>> during
>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
>> state
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
>>>>> IGNITE-12479
>>>>>>>>>> Make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
>> node
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
>> record in
>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
>> node
>>>>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a
>> IGNITE-12227
>>>>>>> Fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
>> #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between
>> cache
>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
>> calculation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
>>>>>>> commits
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
>>>>>>>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1
>> from
>>>>>>> Mira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
>>>>>>>>>> upstream-http/master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> dirty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv")
>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if not line.startswith('-'):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    ticket = line[:-1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    tickets.add(ticket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    founded[ticket] = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in tickets:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    if ticket in commit_msg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        print(commit_msg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        founded[ticket] += 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
>> uses
>>>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>>>>> INSERT
>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
>> when
>>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
>> call
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors
>>>>> must
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>>>>>>>>>> exception -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
>> thread
>>>>>>>>>> shutdown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view
>> implemented.
>>>>>>>>>> (#7495)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent
>> deactivation
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> CLI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>> (#7474)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
>> the
>>>>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>>>>> generation
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
>> during
>>>>>>>> PME
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
>> Spring
>>>>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
>> counter
>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>>>>> number
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
>> record
>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
>> of
>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
>> thrown
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>>>>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
>> during
>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
>> state
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
>> node
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record
>> in
>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
>> recovery
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
>> node
>>>>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>> partition
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
>> #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache
>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread
>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
>> calculation
>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is
>>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on
>> REPLICATED
>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField
>> accessor
>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
>>>>>>>> properties
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
>>>>>>>> lower-case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't
>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> histogram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains
>> underscore
>>>>>>>>>> character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous
>> tickets
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for
>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not
>> it? I
>>>>>>>>>> suppose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager
>> (the
>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know
>> who
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page
>> [1]
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1
>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan
>> Pavlukhin
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator.
>> Should
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay
>> Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1
>> following
>>>>>>>>>> bug-fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can
>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems
>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be
>> used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
>>>>>>> properly
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
>>>>> prevents
>>>>>>>>>> main()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
>>>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]).
>> This
>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a
>>>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments
>> introduced in
>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim
>> Muzafarov
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I
>> think
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and
>> schedule
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
>>>>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
>>>>>>> Izhikov
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1
>> release
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all
>> commits
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in
>> corresponding
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only
>> for a
>>>>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
>>>>>>> Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite
>>>>>>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
>>>>>>> Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
>>>>>>> Maitra
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to
>> merge
>>>>>>>>>> these 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM
>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else
>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I
>> think
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and
>> dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot
>> that
>>>>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for
>>>>>>> guard
>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48,
>> Taras
>>>>>>>>>> Ledkov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>> to SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and
>> Ignite
>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
>>>>>>>>>> thread-safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
>>>>>>> issue,
>>>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
>>>>> cache,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
>>>>>>> queries
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable
>> and
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's
>> settle
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager.
>> This
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
>>>>>>>>>> schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is
>> there
>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM
>>>>>>> Sergey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
>>>>> IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53,
>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32,
>>>>>>> Alexey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
>>>>>>> commits
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that
>> in my
>>>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they
>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as
>>>>> long
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please
>> share
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index
>> creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO
>> query is
>>>>>>>>>> failing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
>>>>>>> partition's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
>>>>>>>> unstable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential
>> race
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
>>>>>>>>>> cluster and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
>>>>>>> rentingFutures
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect
>> rewriting
>>>>>>>> wal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
>>>>> enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
>>>>>>> instead
>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into
>>>>>>>> illegal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
>>>>> serialized
>>>>>>>>>> enum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to
>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx
>> desync
>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent
>> partitions
>>>>>>>>>> owned by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter
>> difference
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition
>> desync if
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
>>>>>>>> difference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
>>>>>>> generated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during
>> purges
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Живи с улыбкой! :D
>>>
>>
>>

[Ilya Kasnacheev]

Hello!

Please apply https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7832

Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev


чт, 21 мая 2020 г. в 16:02, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:

> Hello, Ilya.
>
> Actually, I’m uploading RC0 right now.
> Let’s include these fixes in RC1, if you don’t mind?
>
> > 21 мая 2020 г., в 16:00, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Do you mind if I push additional change to fix English in some of these
> > entries? A lot of these has times not concording with "fixed".
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Ilya Kasnacheev
> >
> >
> > ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 15:47, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> Hello, Igniters.
> >>
> >> I prepared a PR with release notes.
> >> Please, take a look [1]
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7821
> >>
> >>> 20 мая 2020 г., в 13:06, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>
> >> написал(а):
> >>>
> >>> Hello, Jury.
> >>>
> >>> It seems we reached code freeze step for 2.8.1 release.
> >>> I will prepare rc for it shortly.
> >>>
> >>>> 14 мая 2020 г., в 11:08, Юрий <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >>>>
> >>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>
> >>>> Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is
> not
> >>>> actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1].
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>
> >>>> чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]>
> написал(а):
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]
> >:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> TC results: [1], [2]
> >>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]
> >:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello, Alex.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 from me.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]
> >
> >>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose
> to
> >>>>>>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
> >>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>> with indexed types
> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
> >>>>> entry
> >>>>>>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
> >>>>>>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
> >>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>> merged to master.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <
> [hidden email]
> >>> :
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Taras.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you, very much!
> >>>>>>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> OPEN:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC
> >> error
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform
> >> error:System.NullReferenceException -
> >>>>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
> >>>>> really
> >>>>>>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free
> ready)
> >>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. -
> >> Pavel
> >>>>>>>>>> Voronkin
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command
> -
> >>>>>>> YuJue
> >>>>>>>> Li
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should
> be
> >>>>>>>> handled
> >>>>>>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom
> spliterator()
> >>>>>>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
> >>>>>>>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
> >>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error:
> >> Unexpected
> >>>>>>> row
> >>>>>>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related
> >> tickets
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and
> ability
> >> to
> >>>>>>>>>> disable SQL functions.
> >>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare
> values
> >>>>>>> while
> >>>>>>>>>> traversing index tree.
> >>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
> >>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full
> >> read
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
> >>>>>>>>>>> [2].
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
> >>>>>>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag
> was
> >> not
> >>>>>>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are
> >> already
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <
> >> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out
> >> that
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>> need 3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after
> my
> >>>>>>>> initial
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them
> fix
> >>>>>>>>>> components
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
> >>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have
> >> any.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits
> >> in
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> scope?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly
> by
> >>>>>>>>>> myself, I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <
> >> [hidden email]
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
> >>>>>>> IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>>>> [1][2].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
> >>>>>>>> BPlusTree
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8
> and
> >>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I
> >> mentioned:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1
> >> branch
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
> >> lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke
> communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
> >> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements
> in
> >> bug
> >>>>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >>>>>>> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related
> with
> >>>>> TCP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement
> metrics
> >>>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown
> on
> >>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>> start.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1
> >> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>>> TcpCommunication
> >>>>>>>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be
> changed
> >>>>>>>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
> >> lead to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke
> communication
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
> >> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements
> in
> >> bug
> >>>>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
> >>>>>>> improvements?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
> >>>>>>> TcpCommunication
> >>>>>>>>>> SPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be
> changed
> >>>>>>>>>> probably.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we
> >> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit,
> are
> >>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> ok
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
> >>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following
> >> commits:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
> >> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >>>>>>> INSERT
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries
> cursors
> >>>>>>> must
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
> >> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
> >> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick
> >> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed
> JmxMetricExporterSpi
> >>>>> uses
> >>>>>>>> log
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming
> fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed
> NullPointerException
> >>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >>>>>>> registration
> >>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>>>>>>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
> >> call
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open
> >> files"
> >>>>>>>>>> exception
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL
> >> expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
> >> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics
> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory
> usage. -
> >>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY
> at
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>>>>>>> generation for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> >>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>> PME can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on
> unstable
> >>>>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race
> on
> >>>>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> >>>>> Spring
> >>>>>>>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
> >> counter
> >>>>>>>> value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> >>>>> number
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
> >> record
> >>>>>>>>>> type in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled -
> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead
> of a
> >>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
> version
> >> of
> >>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
> >> thrown
> >>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> >>>>> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
> >>>>> IGNITE-12545
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to
> >> partition
> >>>>>>> map
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition
> consistency
> >>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
> >> during
> >>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
> >> state
> >>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
> >> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
> >>>>> IGNITE-12479
> >>>>>>>>>> Make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
> >> node
> >>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
> >> record in
> >>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> >>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned
> by
> >>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
> >> node
> >>>>>>>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a
> >> IGNITE-12227
> >>>>>>> Fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> >>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
> >> #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed
> NullPointerException
> >>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between
> >> cache
> >>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes
> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for
> thread
> >>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
> >> calculation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
> >>>>>>> commits
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
> >>>>>>>> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1
> >> from
> >>>>>>> Mira
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and
> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
> >>>>>>>>>> upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order
> with
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>> dirty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> python
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv")
> >> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
> >> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
> >>>>>>>>>> configuration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
> >> uses
> >>>>>>>> log
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
> >>>>> INSERT
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
> >> when
> >>>>>>>>>> memory
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
> >>>>> registration
> >>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
> >>>>>>> metastorage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
> >> call
> >>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries
> cursors
> >>>>> must
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open
> files"
> >>>>>>>>>> exception -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL
> expression.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
> >> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
> >> thread
> >>>>>>>>>> shutdown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>> #7522.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view
> >> implemented.
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7495)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent
> >> deactivation
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>> CLI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
> metrics
> >>>>>>>>>> improvement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
> >> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>> (#7474)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage.
> -
> >>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>> #7469.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> MERGE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
> >>>>>>>> generation
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
> >> during
> >>>>>>>> PME
> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on
> unstable
> >>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race
> on
> >>>>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
> >> Spring
> >>>>>>>>>> Data. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
> >> counter
> >>>>>>>> value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
> >>>>> number
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
> >>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>> policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
> >> record
> >>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled -
> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7366.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of
> a
> >>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
> >>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
> >> of
> >>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
> >> thrown
> >>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
> >>>>> #7335.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition
> consistency
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
> >> during
> >>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
> >> state
> >>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
> >> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
> >> node
> >>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
> record
> >> in
> >>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
> >> recovery
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned
> by
> >>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
> >> node
> >>>>>>>>>> join. -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
> >> partition
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
> >> #7270.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
> >> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between
> cache
> >>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes
> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for
> thread
> >>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
> >> calculation
> >>>>>>>>>> optimized.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node
> is
> >>>>>>>> started
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on
> >> REPLICATED
> >>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField
> >> accessor
> >>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
> >>>>>>>> properties
> >>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
> >>>>>>>> lower-case
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean
> doesn't
> >>>>>>> show
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> histogram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains
> >> underscore
> >>>>>>>>>> character
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes
> #7507.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
> >>>>>>>> available
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits
> to
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous
> >> tickets
> >>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted
> for
> >>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>> yourself
> >>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not
> >> it? I
> >>>>>>>>>> suppose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager
> >> (the
> >>>>>>>>>> current
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know
> >> who
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay
> Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page
> >> [1]
> >>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into
> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into
> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan
> >> Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator.
> >> Should
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release
> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay
> >> Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
> >>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex
> Plehanov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1
> >> following
> >>>>>>>>>> bug-fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition
> can
> >>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems
> >> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be
> >> used
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
> >>>>>>> properly
> >>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
> >>>>> prevents
> >>>>>>>>>> main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
> >>>>>>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>>>> read
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]).
> >> This
> >>>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brings
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with
> a
> >>>>>>> large
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments
> >> introduced in
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim
> >> Muzafarov
> >>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
> >>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I
> >> think
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and
> >> schedule
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten
> minor
> >>>>>>>>>> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
> >>>>>>> Izhikov
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1
> >> release
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) -
> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all
> >> commits
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in
> >> corresponding
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
> >>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
> >>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only
> >> for a
> >>>>>>>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
> >>>>>>> Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and
> Ignite
> >>>>>>> native
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
> >>>>>>> Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
> >>>>>>> Maitra
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to
> >> merge
> >>>>>>>>>> these 2
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and
> confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM
> >> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
> >>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one
> else
> >> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I
> >> think
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and
> >> dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot
> >> that
> >>>>>>>>>> time,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch
> for
> >>>>>>> guard
> >>>>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics
> for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48,
> >> Taras
> >>>>>>>>>> Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
> >>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>>>>> to SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and
> >> Ignite
> >>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
> >>>>>>>>>> thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
> >>>>>>> issue,
> >>>>>>>>>> e.g.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
> >>>>> cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
> >>>>>>> queries
> >>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis
> Magda
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable
> >> and
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's
> >> settle
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager.
> >> This
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with
> such a
> >>>>>>>>>> schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is
> >> there
> >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50
> AM
> >>>>>>> Sergey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
> >>>>> IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
> >>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53,
> >> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
> >>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at
> 16:32,
> >>>>>>> Alexey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
> >>>>>>> commits
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that
> >> in my
> >>>>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that
> they
> >>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low
> as
> >>>>> long
> >>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please
> >> share
> >>>>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index
> >> creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO
> >> query is
> >>>>>>>>>> failing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
> >>>>>>> partition's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
> >>>>>>>> unstable
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential
> >> race
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical
> (WAL)
> >>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves
> the
> >>>>>>>>>> cluster and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
> >>>>>>> rentingFutures
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
> >>>>>>>> eviction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect
> >> rewriting
> >>>>>>>> wal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
> >>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
> >>>>> enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
> >>>>>>> instead
> >>>>>>>>>> of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
> >>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix
> consistency
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
> >>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes
> into
> >>>>>>>> illegal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
> >>>>> serialized
> >>>>>>>>>> enum
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails
> to
> >>>>>>> find
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
> >>>>> checkpoint
> >>>>>>>>>> record
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx
> >> desync
> >>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent
> >> partitions
> >>>>>>>>>> owned by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter
> >> difference
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition
> >> desync if
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
> >>>>>>> between
> >>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
> >>>>>>>> difference
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
> >>>>>>> generated
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during
> >> purges
> >>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Живи с улыбкой! :D
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

[Nikolay Izhikov-2]

Done, thanks.

> 21 мая 2020 г., в 16:34, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]> написал(а):
>
> Hello!
>
> Please apply https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7832
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> чт, 21 мая 2020 г. в 16:02, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hello, Ilya.
>>
>> Actually, I’m uploading RC0 right now.
>> Let’s include these fixes in RC1, if you don’t mind?
>>
>>> 21 мая 2020 г., в 16:00, Ilya Kasnacheev <[hidden email]>
>> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Do you mind if I push additional change to fix English in some of these
>>> entries? A lot of these has times not concording with "fixed".
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>
>>>
>>> ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 15:47, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>
>>>> I prepared a PR with release notes.
>>>> Please, take a look [1]
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7821
>>>>
>>>>> 20 мая 2020 г., в 13:06, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>
>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello, Jury.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems we reached code freeze step for 2.8.1 release.
>>>>> I will prepare rc for it shortly.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 14 мая 2020 г., в 11:08, Юрий <[hidden email]>
>> написал(а):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Release 2.8.1 are delayed and announced dates [1] at release page is
>> not
>>>>>> actual. Could you update it to reflect current vision of release date?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1].
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> чт, 7 мая 2020 г. в 17:23, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7 мая 2020 г., в 13:20, Denis Garus <[hidden email]>
>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>> could we add the simple improvement [1] to 2.8.1 scope?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12983
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> чт, 30 апр. 2020 г. в 11:26, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]
>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TC results: [1], [2]
>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12933 and IGNITE-12855 to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7754%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7755%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> вт, 28 апр. 2020 г. в 15:19, Nikolay Izhikov <[hidden email]
>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alex.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose
>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for
>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>> with indexed types
>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and
>>>>>>> entry
>>>>>>>>>>> expiration when persistent is enabled
>>>>>>>>>>> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed
>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>> merged to master.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <
>> [hidden email]
>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, very much!
>>>>>>>>>>>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> OPEN:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC
>>>> error
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform
>>>> error:System.NullReferenceException -
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IN PROGRESS:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on
>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free
>> ready)
>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. -
>>>> Pavel
>>>>>>>>>>>> Voronkin
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command
>> -
>>>>>>>>> YuJue
>>>>>>>>>> Li
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should
>> be
>>>>>>>>>> handled
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Nikolai Kulagin
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom
>> spliterator()
>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and
>>>>>>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>>>>>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error:
>>>> Unexpected
>>>>>>>>> row
>>>>>>>>>>>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related
>>>> tickets
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> port into 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and
>> ability
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> disable SQL functions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare
>> values
>>>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>>>> traversing index tree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full
>>>> read
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> unlock the GridH2Table.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
>>>>>>>>>>>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag
>> was
>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are
>>>> already
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster from newly joined ones.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, go ahead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out
>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> need 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more cherry-picks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after
>> my
>>>>>>>>>> initial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them
>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> components
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and tests for them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without
>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have
>>>> any.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> scope?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly
>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>> myself, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1][2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding
>>>>>>>>>> BPlusTree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8
>> and
>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I
>>>> mentioned:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1
>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <
>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
>>>> lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke
>> communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements
>> in
>>>> bug
>>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>>>>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related
>> with
>>>>>>> TCP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement
>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown
>> on
>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>> start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1
>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be
>> changed
>>>>>>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could
>>>> lead to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke
>> communication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations
>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements
>> in
>>>> bug
>>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this
>>>>>>>>> improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756
>>>>>>>>> TcpCommunication
>>>>>>>>>>>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be
>> changed
>>>>>>>>>>>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we
>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit,
>> are
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for
>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following
>>>> commits:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>>>>>>>>> INSERT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries
>> cursors
>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick
>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed
>> JmxMetricExporterSpi
>>>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming
>> fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed
>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>>>>>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>>>>>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
>>>> call
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open
>>>> files"
>>>>>>>>>>>> exception
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL
>>>> expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics
>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory
>> usage. -
>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY
>> at
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>>>>>>>>> generation for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>> PME can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on
>> unstable
>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race
>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
>>>>>>> Spring
>>>>>>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
>>>> counter
>>>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>> type in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled -
>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead
>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
>> version
>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a -
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12545
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to
>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>> map
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition
>> consistency
>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 -
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12479
>>>>>>>>>>>> Make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
>>>> node
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
>>>> record in
>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned
>> by
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a
>>>> IGNITE-12227
>>>>>>>>> Fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
>>>> #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed
>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between
>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for
>> thread
>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
>>>> calculation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of
>>>>>>>>> commits
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my
>>>>>>>>>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1
>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> Mira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and
>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>> upstream-http/master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order
>> with
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv")
>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if not line.startswith('-'):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   ticket = line[:-1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   tickets.add(ticket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   founded[ticket] = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in tickets:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   if ticket in commit_msg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       print(commit_msg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       founded[ticket] += 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext
>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi
>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on
>>>>>>> INSERT
>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException
>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ
>>>>>>> registration
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for
>>>>>>>>> metastorage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service
>>>> call
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries
>> cursors
>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open
>> files"
>>>>>>>>>>>> exception -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL
>> expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over
>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed
>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>> shutdown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled -
>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view
>>>> implemented.
>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7495)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent
>>>> deactivation
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> CLI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7474)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage.
>> -
>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>>>>>>>>>> generation
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages
>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>> PME
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on
>> unstable
>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race
>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in
>>>> Spring
>>>>>>>>>>>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update
>>>> counter
>>>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge
>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for
>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled -
>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>> #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of
>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client:
>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version
>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition
>> consistency
>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM
>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum
>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the
>>>> node
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
>> record
>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during
>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned
>> by
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on
>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>> join. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes
>>>> #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException
>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between
>> cache
>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for
>> thread
>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count
>>>> calculation
>>>>>>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node
>> is
>>>>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on
>>>> REPLICATED
>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField
>>>> accessor
>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid
>>>>>>>>>> properties
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of
>>>>>>>>>> lower-case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean
>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> histogram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains
>>>> underscore
>>>>>>>>>>>> character
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes
>> #7507.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch
>>>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits
>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous
>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted
>> for
>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not
>>>> it? I
>>>>>>>>>>>> suppose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager
>>>> (the
>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know
>>>> who
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay
>> Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page
>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into
>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into
>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan
>>>> Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator.
>>>> Should
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reflect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release
>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay
>>>> Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this
>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex
>> Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1
>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition
>> can
>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems
>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be
>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop
>>>>>>>>> properly
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this
>>>>>>> prevents
>>>>>>>>>>>> main()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for
>>>>>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]).
>>>> This
>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with
>> a
>>>>>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments
>>>> introduced in
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim
>>>> Muzafarov
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all
>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I
>>>> think
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and
>>>> schedule
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten
>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay
>>>>>>>>> Izhikov
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1
>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) -
>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all
>>>> commits
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in
>>>> corresponding
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only
>>>> for a
>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав
>>>>>>>>> Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and
>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya
>>>>>>>>> Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey
>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat
>>>>>>>>> Maitra
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to
>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>> these 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and
>> confirm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM
>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one
>> else
>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I
>>>> think
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and
>>>> dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot
>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch
>> for
>>>>>>>>> guard
>>>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics
>> for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48,
>>>> Taras
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ledkov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1]
>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>>> to SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and
>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
>>>>>>>>>>>> thread-safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL
>>>>>>>>> issue,
>>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated
>>>>>>> cache,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such
>>>>>>>>> queries
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis
>> Magda
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's
>>>> settle
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager.
>>>> This
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with
>> such a
>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is
>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50
>> AM
>>>>>>>>> Sergey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket
>>>>>>> IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to
>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53,
>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2]
>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at
>> 16:32,
>>>>>>>>> Alexey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]
>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the
>>>>>>>>> commits
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that
>>>> in my
>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that
>> they
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low
>> as
>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please
>>>> share
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index
>>>> creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO
>>>> query is
>>>>>>>>>>>> failing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of
>>>>>>>>> partition's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on
>>>>>>>>>> unstable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential
>>>> race
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical
>> (WAL)
>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of
>>>>>>>>> rentingFutures
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of
>>>>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect
>>>> rewriting
>>>>>>>>>> wal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may
>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is
>>>>>>> enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance
>>>>>>>>> instead
>>>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache
>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013
>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix
>> consistency
>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big
>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes
>> into
>>>>>>>>>> illegal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set
>>>>>>> serialized
>>>>>>>>>>>> enum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails
>> to
>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching
>>>>>>> checkpoint
>>>>>>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx
>>>> desync
>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent
>>>> partitions
>>>>>>>>>>>> owned by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter
>>>> difference
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition
>>>> desync if
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency
>>>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page
>>>>>>>>>> difference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously
>>>>>>>>> generated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during
>>>> purges
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: [hidden email]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Живи с улыбкой! :D
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>